PRACTICALITY OF STEM INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC PHYSICS TEACHING MATERIALS ON ELASTICITY MATERIALS TO IMPROVE 21st CENTURY SKILLS OF STUDENTS

Vivi Mardian - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
Asrizal Asrizal - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
Akmam Akmam - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
Silvi Sari - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
Ida Nurshanty - Senior High School 2 Padang

Abstract


The breakneck internet access speed evidences the progress of society in the 21st century. Internet access speed is a form of community progress 5.0 in obtaining quality information. 21st-century skills have been born along with the development of information and communication technology (ICT). The rapid growth of ICT raises concerns about the human workforce that can be replaced by robots. The first actual condition is that 21st-century skills such as problem-solving, creative thinking, collaboration, and communication, are still low. The second exact condition is that the teaching materials used have not been integrated with STEM, with a value of 48%. The purpose of this study was to determine the practicality of developing STEM integrated electronics physics teaching materials to improve students' 21st-century skills. This study uses the type of research R&D (Research & Development). While the model used is the Plomp model. Based on the research results that have been done, it can be concluded that the results of the practicality of teaching materials in the one-to-one, small group, and field test trials are 80, 84, and 83, respectively. This can be interpreted that the electronic teaching materials developed are practical and can be used when learning physics.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Onday, O. (2019). Japan’s Society 5.0: Going Beyond Industry 4.0. Business and Economics Journal, 1-6.

Savitri, A. (2019). Revolusi industri 4.0; Mengubah tantangan menjadi peluang di Era Disrupsi 4.0. Yogjakarta: Genesis.

Mihelac, L. (2021). Transferability of knowledge : adapting VET curriculum for the demand of 21st job market with gamification. Slovenia .

Griffin, P., Care, E., & Mc Graw, B. (2012). The changing role of education and scholls. Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills, 1-15.

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment 2007, 1-23.

Leen, C. C. (2014). Creative and critical thinking in Singapore schools. Singapore: Nanyang Technological University.

Abdullah, M., & Osman, K. (2010). 21st Century Intensive Thinking Skills among primary Students in Malaysia and Brunei. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1646-1651). Malaysia: Elsevier.

Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills: A guide to evaluating mastery and aunthentic learning. USA: Corwin.

Skill, P. f. (2007). The intellectual and policy foundations of the 21st skills framework . Washington DC.

Association, N. E. (2021). Professional Learning Communication Receiving. Retrieved August 25, 2021, from National Education Association: https://www.nea.org/professional-excellence/professional-learning/resources/communication-receiving

Khan, A., Khan, S., & Ul-Islam, S. Z. (2017). Communication Skills of a Teacher and Its Role in the. Journal of Education and Practice , 18-21.

Handyani, N., Dwi, S., & Ishafit. (2021). Pemanfaatan google classroom pada pembelajaran IPA jarak jauh untuk meningkatkan keterampilan komunikasi peserta didik. jurnal pendidikan IPA, 66-80.

Pratiwi, P., Nurhidayah, & Aris, M. (2017). Pengembangan modul mata kuliah penilaian pembelajaran sosiologi berorientasi HOTS. Cakrawala pendidikan, 201-209.

Pannen, P. (1996). Pengembangan bahan ajar. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Asrizal, Desnita, & Darvina, Y. (2020). Analysis of validity and practicality test of physics enrichment e-book based on CTL and enviromental factor. 3rd International Conference on Research and Learning of Physics (ICRLP) . Padang: Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Depdiknas. (2010). Panduan pengembangan bahan ajar berbasis TIK. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Laila, R., & Asrizal. (2020). Analysis of need for development of physics teaching. 3rd International Conference on Research and Learning of Physics (ICRLP). Padang: Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

Ainley, J., Kos, J., & Nicholas, M. (2008). Participation in science, Mathematics and Technology in Australia Education. Victoria: The Australian Council for Education Research.

Winarni, J., Zubaidah, S., & Koes, S. (2016). STEM: Apa, mengapa, dan bagaimana. Prosiding semnas pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM, (pp. 976-984). Malang.

Torlakson, T. (2014). INNOVATE; A blueprint for science, technology, engeneering and mathematics. California: State superintendent of public instruction.

Lestari, D., Astuti, B., & Darsono, T. (2018). Implementasi LKS dengan Pendekatan STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal pendidikan fisika dan teknologi, 202-207.

Mu'minah, I. H., & Aripin, I. (2019). Implementasi Pembekajaran IPA berbasis STEM berbantuan ICT untuk meningkatkan keterampila abad 21. Journal ilmiah ilmu pengetahuan alam, 28-35.

Rasmi, D. e. (2021). Implementation of STEM learning Using the slingshot Toy Project on Elasticity and Hooke's law. AIP Conference proceeding (p. 020027). LCC.

Plomp, T. (2013). Educational design research: An introduction. Educational design research, 11-50.

Arikunto, S. (2015). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/12193171074