COMBINATION DESIGN OF KNOWLEDGE DIMENSIONS AND THINKING PROCESS LEVELS ON PARABOLIC MOTION LEARNING DEVICES FOR PHYSICS LEARNING IN PEKANBARU CITY HIGH SCHOOL

Jeremia Vincensius - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
Amali Putra - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
- Murtiani - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia
- Hidayati - Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka Air Tawar Padang 25131, Indonesia

Abstract


The 2013 curriculum for high school physics lessons mandates teachers to change learning patterns that are "tell" to "find out" through a combination of various dimensions of knowledge and levels of thinking processes that students must master. It’s hoped that through learning, there will be an increase in students' knowledge competence and thinking process abilities. The initial study results indicate the need for a design of a combination of knowledge dimensions and levels of thinking processes in the form of learning devices. This study aims to develop a learning device design oriented to the combination of the dimensions of knowledge and the level of the thought process of parabolic motion material for physics learning at SMAN in Pekanbaru City. The type of research is Research and Development (R&D), with the ADDIE development model reduced to the development stage. This study involved three physics lecturers, FMIPA UNP, as expert judgment and learning practitioners, namely three physics teachers at SMAN 2, 7, and 12 Pekanbaru. The research object is lesson plans, teaching materials, and evaluation instruments. The results showed that the theoretical validity of learning devices consisting of lesson plans, teaching materials, and evaluation instruments according to the expert team was 0.74 and was in the medium category or with valid interpretations. According to the practitioner team, the theoretical practicality of learning devices was 0.96 and is in the high category or very practical. Thus, the learning device can be continued with field trials to learn physics at SMAN in Pekanbaru City.


Full Text:

PDF

References


A. Prianto, Winardi and U. N. Qomariyah, On Becoming A Global Citizen: Berbagai Tantangan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia dalam Era Global, Malang: Inteligensia Media, 2019.

Z. Hidayatullah, I. Wilujeng, Nurhasanah, T. G. Gusemanto and M. Makhrus, “Synthesis of the 21st Century Skills (4C) Based Physics Education Research In Indonesia,” JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 88-97, 2021.

L. W. Anderson and D. R. Krathwohl, A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, New York: Addison Wesley Longman, 2001.

A. D. W. Chuntala, “Saintific Approach in 21st Century Learning in Indonesian Language Learning Vocational School of Pharmacy,” International Journal of Active Learning, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 71-77, 2019.

Firman, Baedhowi, W. Murtini, “The Effectiveness of The Scientific Approach to Improve Student Learning Outcomes,” International Journal of Active Learning, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 86-91, 2018.

G. Sugiarto, N. Andriani and M. Yusup, “Studi Kemampuan Mahasiswa Pendidikan Fisika Membuat Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (RPP),” Jurnal Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, vol. 07, no. 1, pp. 48-54, 2020.

M. Arsanti, “Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Penulisan Kreatif Bermuatan Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Karakter Religius Bagi Mahasiswa Prodi PBSI, FKIP, UNISSULA,” KREDO: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Sastra, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 69-88, 2018.

A. Walid, S. Sajidan, M. Ramli and R. G. T. Kusumah, “Construction of The Assessment Concept to Measure Students' High Order Thinking Skills,” Journal for the Education of Gifted Young, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 237-251, 2019.

Mafudiansyah, S. S. Sari and M. Arsyad, “Analisis Hasil Belajar Fisika di SMA Negeri 3 Makasar,” Jurnal Sains dan Pendidikan Fisika (JSPF), vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 8-19, 2020.

Maison, D. A. Kurniawan and R. S. Widowati, “The Quality of Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Misconception Instrument for Parabolic Motion,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 359-369, 2021.

A. Fauziah and Y. Darvina, “Analisis Miskonsepsi Peserta Didik dalam Memahami Materi Gerak Lurus dan Gerak Parabola pada Kelas X SMAN 1 Padang,” Pillar of Physics Education, vol.12, no.1, pp. 73-80, 2019.

C. Wibowo and T. Sunarti, “Analisis dan Prediksi Miskonsepsi Siswa pada Materi Gerak Parabola,” Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 257-264, 2020.

K. Andoko, A. Putra and Hidayati, “Conceptual Model of Learning Materials Oriented to the Dimensions of Knowledge and Cognitive Processes in Balance and Rotational Dynamics for High School Physics Learning,” Pillar of Physics Education, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 138-145, 2021.

H. Ahmad, A. Putra, Hidayati and R. Afrizon, “Integrated Design of Knowledge Dimensions and Thinking Process Level on Measurement Materials for High School Physics Learning,” Pillar of Physics Education, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 205-212, 2021.

D. M. Syarif, A. Putra and L. Dwiridal, “Analisis Kelayakan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Berorientasi Inkuiri Terbimbing pada Materi Hukum Newton Tentang Gerak untuk Pembelajaran Fisika di Kelas X SMA/MA,” Pillar of Physics Education, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 33–40, 2018.

T. F. Delvia, F. Mufit and M. Bustari, “Design and Validity of Physics Teaching Materials Based on Cognitive Conflict Integrated Virtual Laboratory in Atomic Nucleus,” Pillar of Physics Education, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 5-14, 2021.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/12005171074