Pengaruh Tipe Kepribadian Dan Penggunaan Smartphone Terhadap Hasil Belajar Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi

Lusi Lestari - Universitas Negeri Padang
Z Mawardi Effendi - Universitas Negeri Padang

Abstract


This study examined to describe the effect of personality type and smartphone use on economic learning outcomes in class XI IPS at SMA Negeri 3 Kota Solok for the 2019/2020. Type of this study is associative quantitative. Population in this study is students of class XI IPS at SMA Negeri 3 Kota Solok 2019/2020, and sample in this study obtained using the slovin formula with proportional random sampling technique. Data analyse technique used is descriptive and quantitative analyse with multiple linear regression. The result of this study showed that 1) Personality type have a positive effect and significant on the economic learning outcomes with sig 0,006 < 0,05. 2) Smartphone use have a negative effect and not significan on the economic learning outcomes with sig 0,640 < 0,05. 3) Personality type and smartphone use have together effect on the economic learning outcomes with sig 0,009 < 0,05.

Keywords : learning outcomes, personality type, smartphone used


Full Text:

PDF

References


Aviana, R., & Hidayah, F. F. (2015). Pengaruh Tingkat Konsentrasi Belajar Siswa Terhadap Daya Pemahaman Materi Pada Pembelajaran Kimia Di SMA Negeri 2 Batang. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains (Jps), 3(1), 30–33. https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.3.1.2015.30-33

Foen Ng, S., Syamimi Iliani Che Hassan, N., Hairunnisa Mohammad Nor, N., & Ain Abdul Malek, N. (n.d.). The Relationship Between Smartphone Use and Academic Performance: A Case of Students in a Malaysian Tertiary Institution. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4), 58–70. www.mojet.net

Harfiyanto, D., Utomo, C. budi, & Budi, T. (2015). Pola Interaksi Sosial Siswa Pengguna Gadget Di SMA N 1 Semarang. JESS (Journal of Educational Social Studies), 4(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.15294/jess.v4i1.6859

Lepp, A., Barkley, J. E., & Karpinski, A. C. (2015). The relationship between cell phone use and academic performance in a sample of U.S. college students. SAGE Open, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015573169

Nurudin. (2015). Pengantar Komunikasi Masa. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Pervin, L. A., Cervone, D., & John, O. P. (2010). Psikologi Kepribadian Teori dan Penelitian. Kencana.

Prawira, P. A. (2013). Psikologi Kepribadian Dengan Perspektif Baru. Ar-Ruzz Media.

Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Rineka Cipta.

Sriyanti, L. (2011). Psikologi Belajar. STAIN Salatiga Press.

Sudijono, A. (2012). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudjana, N. (2010). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sulistiono, A. (2015). Pengaruh Kepribadian dan Persepsi Siswa Tentang Model Pembelajaran Guru Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas XI SMK Gondang Pada Pembelajaran Matematika. 3(2), 74–84. https://jurnalunikal.ac.id/index.php/Delta/article/view/456/418

Supardi. (2016). Penilaian Autentik Pembelajaran Afektif, Kognitif, dan Psikomotor. PT. RajaGrafindo persada.

Syaidah, U., Suyadi, B., & Ani, H. M. (2018). Pengaruh Kompetensi Guru Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ekonomi di SMA Negeri Rambipuji Tahun Ajaran 2017/2018. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, Ilmu Ekonomi, Dan Ilmu Sosial, 12(2), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.19184/jpe.v12i2.8316

Wahab, R. (2016). Psikologi Belajar. PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/jmpe.v4i1.11042