PENGARUH TEKANAN, KESEMPATAN, RASIONALISASI, DAN KEMAMPUAN TERHADAP PELAKU KECURANGAN KORUPSI (Studi Empiris pada Lembaga Permasyarakatan Kelas I Sukamiskin Bandung)

Rika Wahyuni - Jurusan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi UNP

Abstract


This study aims to examine: (1) the effect of pressure on corruption fraud actors, (2) the effect of opportunity on corruption fraud actors, (3) the effect of rationalization on corruption fraud actors, (4) the effect of ability on corruption fraud perpetrators of corruption Which is in prison class I Sukamiskin Bandung. This type of research is causative research. The sample in this research is the convict of corruption acts that existed in the prison class I Sukamiskin Bandung which amounted to 100 people. This research uses Random Sampling Technique. The data source is the primary data. Data collection method is by using questionnaires delivered directly to Prison Class I Sukamiskin Bandung. The method of data analysis used is multiple regression analysis, with the perpetrators of corruption fraud as dependent variable and independent variables include pressure, opportunity, rationalization and ability. The result of the research concludes that: (1) the pressure has a significant positive effect on corruption fraud actors, where t count <t table is 2,577> 1,985 (sig 0,000 <0,05) so hypothesis 1 is accepted, (2) opportunity has significant positive effect to corruption fraud actors, where t arithmetic> t table is 2.066> 1,985 (sig 0,000 <0,05) so hypothesis 2 is accepted, (3) rationalization has a significant positive effect on corruption fraud actors where t count> t table is 2.054> 1,985 (sig 0,000 <0,05) so that hypothesis 3 is accepted, and (4) ability have significant positive effect to corruption fraud actors, where t count> t table is 2,551> 1,985 (sig 0,000 <0,05) so hypothesis 4 accepted.

Keyword: Corruption Fraud Actors, Pressure, Opportunity, Rationalization, Ability


References


Abdullahi, R dan Mansor, N.2015a. Concomitant Debacle of Fraud Incidences in the Nigeria Public Sector: Understanding the power of Fraud Triangle Theory. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance, and Management Science.

Abdullahi, R., dan Mansor, N., 2015b. Fraud Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond Theory. Understanding the Convergent and Divergent for Future Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance, and Management Science.

Aghghaleh, Sabnam Fazhli, dkk. 2014. Fraud Risk Factors of Fraud Triangle and the Likelihood of Fraud Occurrence: Evidence from Malaysia. Information Management and Business Review Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1-7.

Albrecth, W.S., Albrecth, C.O., Albrecth, C,C., &Zimbelman, M.F. 2012. Fraud Examination (Fourth edition). OH, USA: South Western Cengage Learning.

Anand,V.,Blake, E, A, & Joshi, M. 2004. Business as usual:The Acceptance and Perpetuation of Corruption. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 39-53.

Antara News. 2016. http://sumbar.antaranews.com/berita/165165/sejumlah-narapidana-korupsi-lapas-muaro-tak-memilih.html. Diakses 4 November 2016.

Anwar, Syamsul, 2006, Fikih Antikorupsi Perspektif Ulama Muhammadiyah Majelis Tarjih dan Tajdid PP Muhammadiyah, Jakarta: Pusat studi Agama dan Peradaban (PSAP).

Arens. 2008. Auditing and Assurance Services. Diterjemahkan oleh Herman Wibowo. Jakarta : Erlangga.

Arikunto, Suharimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arles, Leardo, dan Anita. 2013. Akuntansi Forensik Dalam Upaya Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Program Pendidikan Profesi Universitas Riau.

Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE). 2010. Report to The Nations on Occupational Fraud and Abuse,2010 Global Fraud Survey. Austin, TX: ACFE.

Atmasasmita, Romli. 2002. Korupsi, Good Governance dan Komisi Anti Korupsi di Indonesia. Departemen Kehakiman dan HAM RI : Jakarta

Azhar, Muhammad, 2003, Pendidikan Antikorupsi, Yogyakarta: LP3 UMY, Partnership, Koalisis Antarumat Beragama untuk Antikorupsi.

Binde, Pir. 2016. Gambling-related Embezzlement in The Workplace: A Qualitative Study. International Gambling Studies, 2016.

Boy Endra Tamin. 2015. http://www.boyyendratamin.com/2015/01/pelaksanaan-good-governance-sebagai.html. Diakses 9 November 2016.

Brennan, Niamh dan McGrath, Mary. 2007. Financial statement fraud : some lessons from US and European case studies. Australian Accounting Review, 17 (42): 49-61.

Dahlia, dkk. 2013. Analisis Pengaruh Faktor-Faktor yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Proceedings of Population and Human Resources Development, Vol. 2, April 2013.

Dellaportas, Steven. 2012. Conversations with inmate accountants: Motivation, opportunity, and the fraud triangle. Accounting Forum, 37, 29-39. Doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2012.09.003

Fawa’id, Ahmad,dkk, 2006, NU Melawan Korupsi: Kajian Tafsir dan Fiqih, Jakarta: Tim Kerja Gerakan Nasional Pemberantasan Korupsi Pengurus Besar Nahdlatul Ulama.

Ghozali, Imam. 2005. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan program SPSS. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.

Greenlee, Janet, dkk. 2006. An Investigation of Fraud in Nonprofit Organizations: Occurrences and Deterrents. Working Paper No. 35.

Gujarati, Damodar. 1999. Ekonomitrika Dasar. Terjemahan Sumarno Zain. Erlangga. Jakarta.

Istianah, Ida Farida, dan Krisdiyawati. 2014. Faktor-faktor yang memotivasi tindakan korupsi pada anggaran di kab. Tegal.

Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi, 2006, Memahami Untuk Membasmi; Buku Saku Untuk Memahami Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Jakarta: Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.

Kompas. 2016. http://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2016/10/12/06552581/tangkap.tangan.di.kemenhub.dan.fenomena.praktik.pungli. Diakses 9 November 2016.

Kuncoro, Mudrajad. 2003. Metode Riset untuk Bisnis dan Ekonomi. Jakarta : Erlangga.

Liputan 6. 2016. http://news.liputan6.com/read/2634877/jk-kejahatan-korupsi-lebih-kuno-dari-pelacuran. Diakses 3 november 2016.

Liputan6.com. 2016. http://news.liputan6.com/read/2477341/kasus-korupsi-di-indonesia-menggila. Diakses 4 November 2016.

Lokanan, Mark, E. 2015. Challenges to The Fraud Triangle: Questions on its Usefulness. Accounting Forum. ACCFOR-315, Pages 24.

Murdock, Hernan. 2008. The three dimensions of fraud: auditors should understand the needs, opportunities, and justifications that lead individuals to commit fraudulent acts. Internal Auditor. 65.4 (Aug. 2008): p81.

Nasir, Ridwan, 2006, Dialektika Islam dengan Problem Kontemporer, IAIN Press & LKiS.

Oxford Dictionaries. 2016. https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/corruption. Diakses 20 Desember 2016.

Pope, Jeremy, 2003, Strategi Memberantas Korupsi; Elemen Sistem Integritas Nasional, (terj.) Masri Maris, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Rossouw, G.J, Mulder, B., & Barkhyusen, B. 2000. Defining and Understanding Fraud: A South African Case Study. Business Ethics Quarterly, 10(4), 885-895.

SPSS Indonesia. 2017. http://www.spssindonesia.com/. Diakses April 2017.

Sugiyono. 2008. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif kulitatiF dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta.

Suradi. 2012. Mengapa Seseorang Melakukan Korupsi?. Diakses dari: http://www.bppk.depkeu.go.id/bdk/palembang/attachment/178_MENGAPA-SESEORANG-KORUPSI.pdf

Transparency International. 2016. http://www.ti.or.id/index.php/publication/2016/01/27/corruption-perceptions-index-2015. Diakses 3 November 2016.

Tuanakotta, Theodorus. 2012. Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit FE Universitas Indonesia.

Wells, Joseph T.. 2001. Why Employees Commit Fraud :It’s either greed or need. Journal of Accountancy; New York191.2 (Feb 2001): 89-91.

Wolfe,D., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond: Considering four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74 (12), 38-42.

Zaini, M, dkk. 2015. Analisis Pengaruh Fraud Diamond Theory dan Gone Theory terhadap Academic Fraud (Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Akuntansi Se-Madura). Universitas Trumojoyo Madura.