Pengaruh Opini Audit, Pergantian Auditor Dan Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik Terhadap Audit Report Lag (Studi Empiris Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia )

Pinta Tambunan - Program Studi Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Padang

Abstract


This study aims to obtain empirical evidence: (1) the effect of audit opinion on the audit report lag, (2) the effect of auditor switching on the audit report lag and (3) the effect of size of Public Accountant Firm on the audit report lag at a manufacturing company registered on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. This study considered the causative research. The population in this study is a manufacturing company listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the year 2010-2011. A total of 89 companies were enrolled in this study,determined by the purposive sampling method. The method of analysis used is double regression analysis. The results showed that (1) Audit opinion does not influence the audit report lag, indicated by the level of sig 0,482 > 0,05 and β negative is -1,384. (2) Auditor switching does not influence the audit report lag indicated by the level of sig 0,142 > 0,05 and β positive is 3,368. (3) Big four Public Accountant Firm a significant negative impact on the audit report lag, indicated by the level of sig 0,002 < 0,05 and β negative is -1,384. In this study suggested: (1) For further research to expand a variable that is estimated to affect audit report lag in order to obtain a better explanation of the phenomena. (2) For the auditor to plan the field work as well as possible so that the work can be done effectively and efficiently. Given the number of clients being audited from year to year increases the auditor should plan carefully so that the resulting audited financial statements on time. (3) For public companies to provide flexibility to the auditor to conduct field work before the closing date of the fiscal year. Company auditor jobs are expected to be petrified by providing the necessary data during the checkout process, providing correct answers and reasonable to questions by auditors that audited financial statements be issued early.

Key words: audit opinion, auditor switching, size of Public Accountant Firm, audit report lag


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed dan Hossain. 2010. “Audit Report Lag: A Study of the Bangladeshi Listed Companies”. ASA University Review. Vol 4, No 2.

Alvina Noor Arifa. 2013. Pengembangan Model Audit Delay dengan Audit Report Lag dan Total Lag. Accounting Analysis Journal. Vol 1, No 4.

Arens, Alvin, et al. 2008. Auditing dan Jasa Assurance Pendekatan Terintegrasi. Jilid 1. Edisi Keduabelas. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Arens, Alvin, et al. 2011. Auditing dan Jasa Assurance Pendekatan Terpadu. Jilid 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Arens, Alvin, et al. 2011. Auditing dan Jasa Assurance Pendekatan Terpadu. Jilid 2. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Bapepam Denda Emiten. http://www. Okezone.com. Diakses tanggal 12 November 2013

Boyton, Johnson, dan Kell. 2002. “Modern Auditing”. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Boyton, Raymond dan Walter. 2003. “Modern Auditing”. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Bursa Efek Indonesia. “Annual Report”. www.idx.co.id. Diakses tanggal 12 November 2013

Cristina dan Bambang. 2003. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Independensi Penampilan Akuntan Publik. TEMA, Vol IV, No 2.

Ghozali, Imam. 2005. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan Program SPSS. Semarang. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Guy, et al. 2002. Auditing. Jilid 1. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Hernawati dan Kristyana. 2012. Analisis Faktor-Faktor Audit Delay Perusahaan Manufaktur dan Finansial di BEI. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Sistem Teknologi Informasi. Vol 9, No 1, Hal: 11 – 22.

Husein. 1997. Riset Akuntansi. Jakarta: Penerbit PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Keputusan Ketua Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal dan Lembaga Keuangan Nomor: KEP-346/BL/2011 tentang Penyampaian Laporan Keuangan. http://www.bapepam.go.id. Diakses tanggal 18 November 2013.

Keputusan Ketua Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal dan Lembaga Keuangan Nomor: Kep-431/BL/2012 tentang Penyampaian Laporan Keuangan. http://www.bapepam.go.id. Diakses tanggal 17 November 2013.

Keputusan Ketua Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal dan Lembaga Keuangan Nomor: KEP- 310/BL/2008 tentang Independensi Akuntan yang Memberikan Jasa di Pasar Modal. http://www.bapepam.co.id. Diakses tanggal 18 November 2013.

Kogilavani dan Marjan. 2013. “Determinants of Audit Report Lag and Corporate Governance in Malaysia”. International Journal of Business and Management. Vol 8, No 15.

Lina dan Yohanes. 2009. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Audit Report Lag (ARL). SOLUSI. Vol 8, No 3, Hal: 29 – 42.

Meylisa dan Estralita. 2010. Faktor- Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Audit Report Lag pada Perusahaan yang Terdaftar di BEI. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi. Vol 12, No 3, Hal: 175-186.

Mulyadi. 2002. “Auditing”. Buku 1. Edisi 6. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Republik Indonesia Nomor 17/PMK.01/2008 tentang Jasa Akuntan Publik. http://www.bapepam.go.id. Diakses tanggal 18 November 2013.

Primsa, Subagyo dan Malem. 2012. Faktor- Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Audit Report Lag pada Perusahaan yang Listed di BEI. Pekan Ilmiah Dosen FEB.

Prince, Emmanuel dan Ohiorenuan. 2012. “Determinants of Audit Delay in Nigerian Companies: Empirical Evidence”. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting. Vol 3, No 6.

Riyatno. 2007. Pengaruh Ukuran Kantor Akuntan Publik Terhadap Earnings Response Coefficients. Jurnal Keuangan dan Bisnis. Vol 5, No 2, Hal: 148-162.

Rosmawati dan Supriyati. 2012. Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Audit Report Lag Perusahaan Manufaktur di Indonesia dan Malaysia. The Indonesian Accounting Review. Vol 2, No 2, Hal 185 – 202.

Rustiarini dan Mita. 2013. Pengaruh Karakteristik Auditor, Opini Audit, Audit Tenure, Pergantian Auditor pada Audit Delay. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Humanika. Vol 2, No 2.

Stepvanny dan Gatot Soepriyanto. 2012. Penerapan IFRS dan Pengaruhnya terhadap Keterlambatan Penyampaian Laporan Keuangan: Studi Empiris Perusahaan Manufaktur di BEI Periode Tahun 2008-2009. Binus Business Review. Vol 3, No 2, Hal: 993-1009

Sugiyono. 2011. Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta.