Editorial Policies
Focus and Scope
Voteteknika (Vocational Teknik Elektronika dan Informatika) is a peer-reviewed, scientific journal published by Department of Electronics Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Negeri Padang, Indonesia. The aim of this journal is to publish articles dedicated to all aspects of the latest outstanding developments in the fields of Vocational Education, Electronics Engineering and Informatics. Voteteknika (Vocational Teknik Elektronika dan Informatika) is published four times a year in March, June, September and December with the scopes and focus of the research, but it is not limited to :
- Vocational Education
- Electronics
- Telecommunication
- Robotic Instrumentation
- Control Systems
- Artificial Intelligence
- Internet of Things
- Information Systems
- Data Mining
- Expert Systems
- Mobile Technology & Applications
- Web Technology
- Computer Network
- Network Management and Security
- Computer & Embedded System
- IT Governance
- Enterprise Resource Planning
- Software Testing
- Modeling and Simulation
Section Policies
Articles
- Open Submissions
- Indexed
- Peer Reviewed
Peer Review Process
We are committed to prompt evaluation and publication of fully accepted papers in Voteteknika (Vocational Teknik Elektronika dan Informatika). To maintain a high-quality publication, all submissions under a rigorous review process. Characteristics of the peer review process are as follows:
- Simultaneous submissions of the same manuscript to different journals will not be tolerated.
- Manuscripts with contents outside the scope will not be considered for review.
- Papers will be refereed by reviewers and editorial board.
- In addition, Editors will have the option of seeking additional reviews when needed. Authors will be informed when Editors decide further review is required.
- All publication decisions are made by the journal's Editors-in-Chief on the basis of the referees' reports. Authors of papers that are not accepted are notified promptly.
- All submitted manuscripts are treated as confidential documents. We expect our Board of Reviewing Editors and reviewers to treat manuscripts as confidential material as well.
- Editors and reviewers involved in the review process should disclose conflicts of interest resulting from direct competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any of the authors, and remove oneself from cases in which such conflicts preclude an objective evaluation. Privileged information or ideas that are obtained through peer review must not be used for competitive gain.
- All reviewing process are in double blind peer review. This means that the reviewers of the paper won’t get to know the identity of the author(s), and the author(s) won’t get to know the identity of the reviewer.