ANALISIS CLASSROOM CLIMATE PADA UJI COBA PEMBELAJARAN TATAP MUKA (PTM) SAAT PANDEMI COVID-19

Raiza Aulia

doi:10.24036/rapun.v14i1.115258

ANALISIS CLASSROOM CLIMATE PADA UJI COBA PEMBELAJARAN TATAP MUKA (PTM) SAAT PANDEMI COVID-19

Raiza Aulia⁽¹⁾,
(1) Airlangga University

Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2023 Raiza Aulia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/rapun.v14i1.115258

Full Text:

Language : en

Abstract

This pandemic has changed all aspects of life, including the education system. The education system in Indonesia immediately turned online because it could not be done face-to-face. Gradually, the government began to study to restart new normal and conduct face-to-face trials for students, especially high school students in Surabaya. The data collection technique used interviews with students as participants and teachers as a significant other. The author takes the context of classroom climate because face-to-face learning trials are still being reviewed by the local city government to regulate the course of learning in accordance with health protocols. There are three dimensions in the classroom climate, namely relationships, personal growth and development and system changes and improvements. The results of the student interviews showed that they were uncomfortable with face-to-face learning because they felt awkward, uncomfortable in entering the classroom and needed to adapt directly to the teacher, while according to the teacher, the students were very enthusiastic about the face-to-face learning trial.

Keywords

Pandemic;covid-19;online;face to face learning;classroom climate

References

Adelman, H.S., & Taylor, L. (2005). Classroom climate. Encyclopedia of school psychology. Thousand oaks, Ca: Sage.

Angdhiri, R. P. (2020). Challenges of home learning during a pandemic through the eyes of a student. Website: https://www.thejakartapost.com/life/2020/04 /11/challenges-of-home-learning-during-a-pandemic-through-the-eyes-of-a-student.html.

Astuti, A., & Leonard. (2012). “Peran kemampuan komunikasi matematika terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa”, Jurnal Formatif, 2(2), 102-110

Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy the exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Boyatzis, R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks: Sage Pub.

Fachriansyah, R. (2020). Work-from-home policy in effect at major Jakarta companies over virus concerns. Retrieved Jan 21, 2021, from https://www.thejakarta post.com/news/2020/03/15/work-from-ho me-policy-in-effect-at-major-jakarta-com pa nies-over-virus-concerns.html

Febriyanti, C., & Seruni. (2014). “Peran minat dan interaksi siswa dengan guru dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika”, Jurnal Formatif, 4(3), 245-254,

Hadiyanto. (2016). Teori dan pengembangan iklim kelas dan iklim sekolah. Jakarta: Kencana.

Hamid, A. R. A. H. (2020). “Social responsibility of medical journal: A Concern for COVID-19 pandemic”, Medical Journal of Indonesia, 29(1), 1–3.

Hatibie, A. (2015). “Peranan komunikasi antarpribadi guru wali dan murid di SMK Tjokroaminoto Kelurahan Ternate Baru”, Journal “Acta Diurna”, 4(1), 1-9.

Kusuma Ningtyas, D., Virnawati, F., Paramitta, T., & Wayan Simri, I. (2008). “Analisis perilaku pengguna sistem e-learning Universitas Gunadarma”, Seminar Ilmiah Nasional Komputer dan Sistem Intelijen Auditorium Universitas Gunadarma, (Kommit), 20–21.

Muktadi, A. (2005). “Menciptakan iklim kelas (classroom climate) yang kondusif dan berkualitas dalam proses pembelajaran”, Majalah Ilmiah Pembelajaran, 1(2), 199-209.

Neuman, W. L. (2007). Basic of social research: Qualitative and quantitative approach. Boston, United State of America: Pearson Education, Inc.

Notoatmodjo, S. (2007). Promosi kesehatan dan ilmu perilaku. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Nurlaela, A. (2014). “Peranan lingkungan sebagai sumber pembelajaran geografi dalam menumbuhkan sikap dan perilaku keruangan peserta didik”, Jurnal Gea, 14(1), 40-48.

Pakpahan, R., & Fitriani, Y. (2020). “Analisa pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dalam pembelajaran jarak jauh di tengah pandemi virus corona COVID-19”, Journal of Information System, Applied, Management, Accounting and Research, 4(2), 30-36.

Poerwandari, K. (2013). Pendekatan kualitatif untuk penelitian perilaku manusia. Jakarta: LPSP3 Psikologi UI.

Rahmawati, F. (2016). “E-Learning implementation: Its opportunities and drawbacks perceived by EFL students”, Journal of Foreign Languange Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 1-15.

Ramadhani, S. (2018). “Pengaruh interaksi guru-siswa dan lingkungan belajar terhadap minat belajar ekonomi siswa”, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ekonomi, 7(6), 524-532

Safitri, R.S., & Retnasari, M. (2020). “Strategi komunikasi guru SMA Alfa Centauri Bandung masa pembelajaran online di situasi pandemi Covid-19”, Komunikologi Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Komunikasi dan Sosial, 4(1), 64-77

Sardiman. (2012). Interaksi dan motivasi belajar mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Satori, D dkk. (2008). Profesi keguruan. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Sutrisno, B. (2020). 50 days of Indonesia’s partial lockdown. Is it enough for the ‘new normal’?. Retrieved Jan 22, 2021, from https://www.thejakartapost.com/ne ws/2020 /05/28/50-days-of-indonesias-partial-lockdown-is-it-enough-for-the-ne w-normal.html

Yaumi, M. (2007). “The Implementation of distance learning Indonesian higher education”, Lentera Pendidikan, 10(2), 196-215.