English teacher’s strategies in providing written feedback and students’ responses to the feedback at SMPN 12 Padang
), Sitti Fatimah(2), (1) Universitas Negeri Padang 
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang 
Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2025 Dyah Ayu Lestari Ginting, Sitti Fatimah
DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v14i4.136244
Full Text:
Language : en
Abstract
This study aims to analyze teacher’s strategies in providing direct and indirect written feedback through semi structured interview, and to analyze students’ responses in their cognitive, affective, and behavioral responses through questionnaire and focus group discussion. The research was conducted at SMP Negeri 12 Padang with 65 ninth-grade students who came from class IX-2 and IX-4, and 1 English teacher. Descriptive quantitative research approach was employed because the main goal was to describe the existing phenomenon of students’ responses statistically through frequencies and percentages. From the results, it showed that most of students preferred direct feedback with the percentage 88.8% rather than indirect feedback with the percentage 70.75%. The results indicated that the teacher provided both of the feedback, but direct feedback was more frequently and consistently used. Most students preferred direct feedback as it is clearly showed their mistakes, enable immediate correction, and helped them understand. However, some students appreciated indirect feedback because they thought it encouraged them to think critically, searched for the answers independently, and less dependent on the teacher. In the affective responses, 80.7% students said that written feedback made them feel confident, 87.6% said that they were motivated to write better. In behavioral responses, 64.6% students tried to ask teacher if there was something that they did not know, and 75.3% students tried to correct the mistakes that the teacher had marked. The study concludes that combining direct and indirect written feedback can enhance students’ writing skills and increase their motivation in writing.
Keywords
References
Arifin, M., et al. (2019). The effect of direct corrective feedback on students’ writing of recount text. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 301.
Bonsu, E. (2021). The influence of written feedback on the writing skill performance of high school students. International Journal of Applied Research in Social Sciences, 3(3), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijarss.v3i3.234
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Pearson Education, Inc.
Ene, E., & Yao, J. (2021). How does that make you feel: Students’ affective engagement with feedback. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 25, 66–83. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2021.25.04
Farida, M. (2022). Beliefs about feedback provision in EFL writing and actual practices by an experienced Indonesian teacher. Journal of English Teaching and Research, 7, 190.
Fhaeizdhyall, A. (2020). The Effectiveness of direct and indirect written corrective feedback on English collocation competency: A Quasi – Experiment. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 8(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.5296/jsel.v8i1.16434
Gonzales, L. M., Nassaji, H., & Chao Chao, K. W. (2021). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in a French as a foreign language classroom. Journal of Response to Writing, 7(2). https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/journalrwAvailableat:https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/journalrw/vol7/iss2/3
Hattie, J. et al. (2021). Feedback that leads to improvement in student essays: Testing the hypothesis that “Where to Next” Feedback is most powerful. Frontiers in Education, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.645758
Hijriani, D., & Hamzah. (2024). Exploring teachers’ written corrective feedback on students’ writing assignment at junior and senior high schools: A descriptive study at SMP Negeri 22 Padang and SMA Negeri 12 Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 13. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v13i3.130224
Li, F., & Christiansen, X. L. C. (2020). Teacher feedback in UK higher education: Affective and cognitive perceptions of Chinese postgraduate students. International Journal of Educational Research, 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101674
Munir, A., et al. (2024). Student engagement with teacher written feedback in online EFL writing context. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(7), 2186–2192. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1407.26
Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language Teaching Research, 19(2), 129–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815572747
Obilor, E. I. (2019). Feedback and students’ learning. International Journal of Innovative Research in Education. www.seahipaj.org
Palupi, V. U., et al. (2023). Teacher’s written feedback in academic writing class: Students’ perception. Prominent: Journal of English Studies, 6(2), p.
Rabbani, L. M., & Aljanahi, M. H. (2024). Cutting-edge innovations in teaching, leadership, technology, and assessment. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-0880-6.ch019
Ramayadi. (2022). An analysis on student’s response toward teacher’s brainstorming strategy in teaching Reading Comprehension at MA Al Jauhar Duri. State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau.
Sari, M. A. (2022). An Analysis of teacher’s written feedback and students’ respond of feedback. Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 12(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-1202034954
Singh, Y. K. (2006). Fundamental of research methodology and statistics. New Age International Publishers.
Westmacott, A. (2017). Direct vs. indirect written corrective feedback: Student perceptions. Ikala, 22(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.ikala.v22n01a02
Widhiasih, L. K. S., & Maharani, A. A. P. (2016). Respon siswa terhadap umpan balik guru saat pelajaran Bahasa Inggris di SD Saraswati 5 Denpasar. Jurnal Bakti Saraswati, 05(02).
Yunus, W. N. (2020). Written corrective feedback in English compositions: Teachers’ practices and students’ expectations. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i2.2255
Zhang, N. (2024). Feedback preferences and psychological perspectives on student engagement: Affective, cognitive, and behavioral dimensions. Studies in Psychological Science, 2(4), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.56397/sps.2024.12.03
Article Metrics
Abstract Views : 113 times
PDF Downloaded : 36 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Dyah Ayu Lestari Ginting, Sitti Fatimah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.















