An Analysis of Reading Comprehension Questions in English Textbooks Bahasa Inggris Work in Progress and Pathway to English Based on Barrett’s Taxonomy

Novita Rahmadani; Yetti Zainil

doi:10.24036/jelt.v12i3.125152

An Analysis of Reading Comprehension Questions in English Textbooks Bahasa Inggris Work in Progress and Pathway to English Based on Barrett’s Taxonomy

Novita Rahmadani⁽¹⁾, Yetti Zainil⁽²⁾,
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang

Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang

Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2023 Novita Rahmadani

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v12i3.125152

Full Text:

Language : en

Abstract

This descriptive qualitative research aimed to find out the cognitive levels of reading comprehension questions found in English textbooks “Bahasa Inggris Work in Progress” and “Pathway to English” and to investigate English teachers’ opinions on the cognitive levels of Barrett’s taxonomy. There are five levels in this taxonomy which are literal comprehension, reorganization, inferential comprehension, evaluation, and appreciation. The instruments of this research were a checklist table and a semi-structured interview. The result of the analysis showed that there were 117 questions (27%) for the literal comprehension level, 98 questions (22%) for the reorganization level, 176 questions (40%) for inferential comprehension level, 25 questions (6%) for evaluation level, and 21 questions (5%) categorized into appreciation level. The percentages of cognitive levels in the textbooks did not meet the recommended proportion. From the interview result, it was found that the English teachers considered Barrett’s taxonomy as the suitable and practical framework to analyse the cognitive levels of reading comprehension questions. The teachers also stated that Barrett’s taxonomy aligns with Merdeka’s curriculum objectives.

Keywords

Textbook, Reading Comprehension Questions, Cognitive Level, Barrett’s Taxonomy

References

Ahmad, U. L. (2016). Senior high school English national examination and thinking skills. Beyond Words, 4(2), 168-190.

Amalya, R. V. A., Anugerahwati, M., & Yaniafari, R. P. (2020). An Analysis of Reading Comprehension Questions Based on Barrett’s Taxonomy of An English Coursebook Entitled Bright for Eight Graders. National English Education in Language, and Literature Seminar.

Aqeel, M., & Farrah, M. (2019). Eighth-grade textbook reading comprehension questions and Barrett's Taxonomy: Teachers' perspectives at Hebron District, Palestine.

Barrett, C.T. (1967). The Evaluation of Children’s Reading Achievement Perspectives in Reading, No, 8. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?q=thomas+c+barrett+1967&id=ED072422

Clymer, Theodore (1968). “Current Conceptions of Reading”, Innovations and Change in Reading Instruction, ed. Helen M. Robinson. The Sixty-Seventh Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1968. Pp. 7-29.

Escar, E. 2022. What are the Benefits of Reading Comprehension?. Retrieved from https://irisreading.com/what-are-the-benefits-of-reading-comprehension/

Eskey, D. E. (2002). Reading and the Teaching of L2 Reading. TESOL journal, 11(1), 5-9.

Göçer, A. (2014). The Assessment of Turkish Written Examination Questions Based on the Text in Accordance with the Barrett’s Taxonomy. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 3, 1–16. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED557158

Hart, T.U. (2007). A study on impact of school environment on academic achievement among adolescents. International Journal of Social Science Tommorow.6(2), 7-9.

Hidayati, M., Inderawati, R., & Loeneto, B. (2020). The correlations among critical thinking skills, critical reading skills and reading comprehension. English Review: Journal of English Education, 9(1), 69-80.

Kemendikbud, 2022. Kurikulum Merdeka. Retrieved from https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/kurikulum-merdeka/

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

Moleong, L. (2010). Metode peneltian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Nassaji, H. (2015). Qualitative and descriptive research: Data type versus data analysis. Language teaching research, 19(2), 129-132.

Nourdad, N., Masoudi, S., & Rahimali, P. (2018). The effect of higher order thinking skill instruction on EFL reading ability. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 7(3), 231-237.

OECD (2019). PISA 2018 results volume I: What students know and can do. Paris. OECD Publishing.

Rahma, D. N. (2019). An analysis of reading comprehension questions made by English teacher at SMAN 2 Sidoarjo Based on Barret's taxonomy (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya).

Reeves, C. (2012). Developing a Framework for Assessing and Comparing the Cognitive Challenge of Home Language Examinations. UMALUSI. https://www.umalusi.org.za/docs/research/2012/hl_examinations.pdf

Surtantini, R. (2019). Reading comprehension question levels in grade X English students’ book in light of the issues of curriculum policy in Indonesia. Journal of Linguistics and Education, 9(1), 44-52.