An Analysis of Reading Comprehension Questions in the Final English Test Given by English Teachers Based on Barret’s Taxonomy at SMAN in Kota Padang

Selvina Salsabila(1), Yetti Zainil(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2023 Selvina Salsabila

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v12i3.125150

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


This research aims to analyse the reading comprehension questions given by English Teachers at SMAN Kota Padang based on Barrett’s Taxonomy. This taxonomy has five levels, namely: Literal Comprehension, reorganization, Inferential Comprehension, Evaluation, and Appreciation. This study is being done using a descriptive qualitative research design. To gather the necessary data and information, the observation checklist and interview questions are used as instrumentation. The stages of Barrett's taxonomy were used to categorize the questions that were analysed. The results of this study

indicate that from all the reading questions gathered and observed at six schools and three grades, Inferential Comprehension level has the most questions with 40,07% of the total reading comprehension found in grade X, XI, and XII. It is followed by reorganization level at 35,91%, literal comprehension level at 23,01%, evaluation level at 0,39%, and appreciation level at 0,19%. While the conclusive English assessment at SMAN Kota Padang encompasses all facets of Barrett's taxonomy, its implementation is not necessarily reflected in the formulation of reading inquiries. This discrepancy arises from the dissimilarity between the question distribution across taxonomy stages and the advised proportional distribution. Correspondingly, insights gathered from discussions with the teachers indicated that Barrett's taxonomy had not been integrated into the question development process for the final English test. This affirmation further reinforces the notion that the reading comprehension questions given by English teachers have remained detached from the application of Barrett's taxonomy.


Keywords


Taxonomy, Final Test, Reading Comprehension

References


Aung, K., Razak, R., & Nazry, N. (2021). Establishing Validity And Reliability of Semi-Structured Interview Questionnaire in Developing Risk Communication Module: A Pilot Study. . Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2 (3), 600-606.

Byrne, W. J. (n.d.). Cognitive and Affective Dimensions of Reading Comprehension. Retrieved from Curriculum Concepts for Parents and Adults. http://joebyrne.net/curriculum/barrett.pdf.

GÖÇER, A. (2014). The Assessment of Turkish Written Examination Questions Based on the Text in Accordance with the Barrett's Taxonomy. International Journal of Languages' Education and Teaching, 1-16.

Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Kusumawardani, D. K. (2016). An Analysis of Reading Comprehension Questions in the Textbook entitled Bahasa dan Sastra (Peminatan Bahasa dan Budaya) for SMA/MA grade X Based on Barret’s Taxonomy”. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Lindgren, B., Lundman, M., & Graneheim, U. (2020). Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 108.

Muslih. (2009). Improving Reading Comprehension Ability of the Second Year Students of MAN Temanggung through “GRASP” Strategy. English Language Education, Graduate Program of State University of Malang, 3.

Rahma, D. N. (2019). An Analysis of Reading Comprehension Questions Made by English Teacher At SMAN 2 Sidoarjo Based On Barrett's Taxonomy.

Ramadhani, R., & Zainil, Y. (2019). An Analysis of Teachers’ Questions In English. Journal of English Language Teaching.

Reeves, C. (2012). Developing a Framework for Assessing and Comparing the Cognitive Challenge of Home Language Examinations. Umalusi: Pretoria.

Sholkamy, H., Hassanein, N., Cherine, M., Elnoury, A., Breebaart, M., & Khalil, K. (2003). ). An Observation Checklist for Facility-Based Normal Labor and Delivery Practices: The Galaa Study. The Population Council, 5, 1-22.

Trilling, B., & Fade, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco: Josey Bass.

Tulasi, D. (2010). Merunut Pemahaman Taksonomi Bloom: Suatu Kontemplasi Filosofis. Humaniora, 359-371.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 94 times
 PDF Downloaded : 36 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Selvina Salsabila

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.