An Analysis of Barrett’s Taxonomy’s Applications in Teacher Association (MGMP) Published English Workbooks (LKS) for Senior High Schools in Padang

Muhammad Alhadi(1), Yetti Zainil(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Alhadi

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v12i2.123142

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


This research aimed to analyse questions included in English Teacher Association (MGMP) Published English Workbooks (LKS) for Senior High School in Padang based on Barrett’s Taxonomy in Reading Comprehension. The taxonomy consists of five stages which are “Literal Comprehension,” “Reorganization,” “Inferential Comprehension,” “Evaluation,” and “Appreciation.” The research design used for this research is descriptive qualitative, and the instruments used to gather necessary data are an observation checklist and interview questions. The analysed questions were classified based on the stages of Barrett’s taxonomy. The result of the analysis showed that from all the reading comprehension questions in all the workbooks observed, Inferential Comprehension is the stage that is applied by the questions the most, which is at 48.2%, followed by Literal Comprehension at 42.5%, Reorganization at 8%, Appreciation at 1%, and Evaluation at 0.3% of the total questions observed. Although all the stages of Barrett’s taxonomy are present in the workbooks, it does not imply that the taxonomy has been applied in the MGMP Published Workbooks, for the percentages of the questions from each stage do not resemble the recommended rates proposed for each of the stage. In addition to that, by interviewing members of the writing team of the workbooks, it was found that Barrett’s taxonomy had never been applied when constructing questions for the workbooks. This backs up the previous idea that Barrett’s was not applied in MGMP Published English workbooks.

Keywords


Taxonomy; Workbook; Reading Comprehension; MGMP

References


Amalya, R. V. A., Anugerahwati, M., & Yaniafari, R. P. (2020). An Analysis of Reading Comprehension Questions Based on Barrett’s Taxonomy of an English Coursebook Entitled Bright for Eighth Graders. NEELLS Proceedings, 41–49.

Aung, K. T., Razak, R. A., & Nazry, N. N. M. (2021). Establishing Validity and Reliability of Semi-Structured Interview Questionnaire in Developing Risk Communication Module: A Pilot Study. Edunesia : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(3), 600–606. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v2i3.177

Direktur Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan (Director). (2019). Bahan Ajar Pengenalan Pembelajaran dan Penilaian Kurikulum 2013 (Terintegrasi Ppk, Literasi, HOTS, 4cs) (W. Prayitno, Ed.; 1st ed.). Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. https://gtk.kemdikbud.go.id/kemitraan/front/img/unduhan/Pengenalan_Pembelajaran_Kurikulum_2013.pdf

Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399339209516006

GÖÇER, A. (2014). The Assessment of Turkish Written Examination Questions Based on the Text in Accordance with the Barrett’s Taxonomy. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 3, 1–16. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED557158

Israel, S. E., & Duffy, G. G. (2008). Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension (1st ed.). Routledge.

OECD (2019), PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en.

Reeves, C. (2012). Developing a Framework for Assessing and Comparing the Cognitive Challenge of Home Language Examinations. UMALUSI. https://www.umalusi.org.za/docs/research/2012/hl_examinations.pdf

Ruiter, R., & Dang, P. Y. (2005). Highway to E.S.L.: A User-Friendly Guide to Teaching English as a Second Language. iUniverse.

Schleicher, A. (2019). PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations. OECD Publishing EBooks. https://apo.org.au/node/270241

Tarigan, B. N. B., Agung, A. A. G., & Parmiti, D. P. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa (LKS) Bermuatan Karakter untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA. Journal of Education Technology, 3(3), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v3i3.21743


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 74 times
 PDF Downloaded : 73 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Alhadi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.