An Analysis of Questions on Reading Tasks in the English Textbook “Work in Progress” in Merdeka Curriculum

Ripalga Ripalga(1), Fitrawati Fitrawati(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2023 Ripalga Ripalga

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v12i2.123128

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


This research aimed to analyze the distribution of the level of thinking on questions on reading tasks in the English textbook “Work in Progress” in Merdeka curriculum using Marzano and Kendall’s Taxonomy. There are three system or knowledge in this theory which are the self-system, the meta cognitive system, and the cognitive system. The cognitive system in this theory is divided into four level. 1) Level 1 or retrieval level. (2) Level 2 or comprehension level, (3) Level 3 or analisis level, and (4) level 4 or knowledge utilization level. Descriptive qualitative research design used in this research. The first two level, retrieval and comprehension, belong to lower level question while other levels, analysis and knowledge utilization, belong to higher level questions. The researcher examined all reading questions in this textbook and used table analysis to classify them based on the level of thinking. The results showed that lower level questions were found more than higher level questions. Although, higher level questions were also found in the textbook, their number was far below lower level questions. There are several explanation for why lower level questions appear more than high level questions. First, learning should begin from basic to more complex. Second, it can prevent students from being overwhelmed.

Keywords


Marzano and Kendall’s Taxonomy, Level of Thinking, Textbook, Reading Questions, Merdeka Curriculum.

References


Apriani, N. (2019). Evaluating The Higher Order Thinking Skills In Reading

Exercises Of EFL Textbook “Pathway To English” For Tenth Grade Of Senior

High School Students (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN BENGKULU).

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: David McKay Company.

Choo, S. (2022). From 4Cs to 6Cs: What Should Language Teachers Know And

Prepare? (Webinar). SEAMEO QITEP in Language. Retrieved from:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IV-trfJdEJo

Creswell, J.W, Fetters, M.D., &Ivankova, N.V. (2004). Designing a Mixed Methods

Study in Primary Care. The Annals of Family Medicine.

Fadilah, D., & Zainil, Y. (2020). Teachers' Question Types and Students' Speaking

Performance in EFL Classroom. Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(4), 661-671.

Gak, D. M. (2011).Textbook-An important element in the teaching

process. Hatchaba Journal, 19(2), 78-82.

Graves, K. (2000). Designing Language Course, A Guide for Teachers. Boston. Heinle.Cengage Learning.

GTK.Kemdikbud. (2022) Kebijakan Kemdikbud di masa Pandemi. https://gtk.kemdikbud.go.id/read-news/kebijakan-kemendikbud-di-masa- pandemi

Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (Eds.). (2007). The new taxonomy of educational

objectives. Corwin Press.

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that

works: Research-Based Strategies for Increasing Student Achievement. Ascd.

Kemdikbudristekdikti. (2022). Kenali Kurikulum Merdeka, Tingkatkan Kualitas

Pembelajaran. http://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/kurikulum-Merdeka/

Kendall, J. S., & Marzano, R. J. (2008). Designing & assessing educational

objectives. Geraadpleegd van.

Patriantini, D. A. M. M. O., Suarni, N. ., & Adnyana, I. K. S. (2022). Analisis

Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar dan Platform Merdeka Belajar untukMewujudkan Pendidikan yang Berkualitas. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu. 8(02):

-244.

Sucipto, S., & Cahyo, S. D. (2019). A Content Analysis of the Reading Activities in

“Bright 2” an English Textbook for Junior High School Students. English

Language Teaching Jurnal Educational Journal, 2(1), 13-21.

Sweller, J. (1998). Cognitive Load Theory During Problem Solving: Effect on

Learning. COGNITIVE SCIENCE: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12(2), 257- 285.

Tofade, T., Elsner, J., & Haines, S. T. (2013). Best Practice Strategies for Effective

Use of Questions as a Teaching Tool. American Journal of Pharmaceutical

Education. 77(7).

Zainil, Y., & Rosa, R. N. (2020, August). An Analysis of Reading Comprehension

Questions in English Textbooks for SMAN Kota Padang: HOTS. In Eighth

International Conference on Languages and Arts (ICLA-2019) (pp. 76-80). Atlantis Pres


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 506 times
 PDF Downloaded : 247 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Ripalga Ripalga

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.