Gender Differences in Performing Refusal Strategies to an Invitation by Students at SMAN 4 Padang.

Nadia Agustina(1), Hamzah Hamzah(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2023 Nadia Agustina

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v12i2.122961

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


One of the most fundamental English skill is speaking. To practice all of those subjects correctly, the students not only have to understand the grammatical aspect but also the pragmatic aspect espescially for second language lerners. In this context the students not only focus on what is written but also what is happen, whom they talking to and what are they situation they face. The aimed of this research is to find out the refusal strategies used by gender to an invitation and what the differences between them. This research used descriptive study. Through random sampling, twenty male and female from the 12 grade of the students were selected. Data were collected through discourse completion test (DCT). The result showed that both gender is mostly using indirect strategy to refuse an invitation. However, male tend to give the shorter refusal and not pay attention to the context of the interlocutor, for example the power and social distance of the interlocutor.  Beside, female students used more indirect and longer answer and strategy to refuse an invitation and make it clear by combined some refusal strategy, such as statement of regret, wish and statement of alternative. 

Keywords


Speaking, Refusal Strategy, Politeness, Gender, Invitation

References


Ahmed, A. P. S. (n.d.). Socio-cultural Study of Written Invitation Cards in Iraqi Society Assist . Prof . Samara Mohammed Ahmed University of Tikrit College of Education for Humanities English Department.

Beebe, L., Takahashi, T., & Uliss-Weltz, R. (1990). “Pragmatic Transfer in ESL Refusals.” In Robin Scarcella, Elaine Andersen, and Stephen Krashen (eds.), Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language. Developing Communicative Competence in a Second Language, January, 55–73.

Chen. J. H. (1996). Cross-Cultural Comparison of English and Chinese Metapragmatics in Refusal. Theses, 32–33.

Cheng, S. W., & Ke, C. (2006). An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development of expressions of gratitude by Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, Ph.D., 223.

Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3

Farhana Muslim Mohd Jalis, Mohd Azidan Abdul Jabar, H. A. H., & Bukhardt, J. M. (2020). Cross-cultural pragmatics of refusal to invitation among Malays and Germans. 19.

Goffman, E. (2017). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior, 1–270. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203788387


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 89 times
 PDF Downloaded : 22 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Nadia Agustina

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.