An Analysis of Students Errors in Arranging Jumble Words into the Correct Sentences of the Eight Grade at SMP N 7 Padang

Syahmina Syahmina(1), Ainul Addinna(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang 
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2023 syahmina syahmina

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v12i1.121891

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


The purpose of this research was to investigate proportion of omission and addition error and the sources of error made by students when arranging jumble words  at SMP N 7 Padang. The subject of this reserch was students of the eighth grade at SMP N 7 Padang. This research was conducted with quantitative methods and using test ang questionnaire as a tool of data collection. The results of this research show that students make more addition errors than omission errors. based on the research result, the percentage of omission error is 72,8% and addition error 27,2%. For the sources of error this researh focus on intralingual transfer and communication strategy, and the results of the questionnaire for intralingual transfer is 74,08% and communication strategy is 81,27% it means the most factor that makes students make errors in arranged jumble words test is intralingual transfer with percentage 74,08%

The purpose of this research was to investigate proportion of omission and addition error and the sources of error made by students when arranging jumble words  at SMP N 7 Padang. The subject of this reserch was students of the eighth grade at SMP N 7 Padang. This research was conducted with quantitative methods and using test ang questionnaire as a tool of data collection. The results of this research show that students make more addition errors than omission errors. based on the research result, the percentage of omission error is 72,8% and addition error 27,2%. For the sources of error this researh focus on intralingual transfer and communication strategy, and the results of the questionnaire for intralingual transfer is 74,08% and communication strategy is 81,27% it means the most factor that makes students make errors in arranged jumble words test is intralingual transfer with percentage 74,08%


Keywords


Jumble words, omission error, addition error, intralingual transfers, communication strategies

References


Al-Khresheh, M. H. (2016). A review study of error analysis theory. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research, 2, 49-59.

Amilia, N. (2018). An Error Analysis of Students in Arranging The Jumble Words into The Correct Sentences at The Second Semester of The Eighth Grade at Smp N 31 Bandar Lampung in Academic Year of 2017/2018 (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Raden Intan Lampung).

Arikunto S, (2007) Analisis Data Penelitian Deskriptif Dalam Menejamen Penelitian. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta

Ariyani, S. A. (2021). Study of Scramble Method In Teaching English for Secondary Student’s Writing Skill.

Aryadoust, V., & Raquel, M. (Eds.). (2019). Quantitative data analysis for language assessment volume I: Fundamental techniques. Routledge.

Barik, H. C. (1994). A description of various types of omissions, additions and errors of translation encountered in simultaneous interpretation. Bridging the gap: Empirical research in simultaneous interpretation, 3, 121-137.

Brown, D. H. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching . NY: Pearson Educations.

Budiati, E. F. R., & Indut, K. E. (2019). The Influence of Scramble Method on Arranging Sentence Ability of Deaf Students 5th Class Special Education Elementary School Dharma Wanita Sidoarjo. Journal of Education Khon Kaen University (Graduate Studies Research), 13(1), 47-60.

Bungsudi, B., & Faliyanti, E. (2016, September). The Comparison of Using Jumble Words and Word Order Techniques Toward Students’ Grammar Mastery. In Sriwijaya University Learning and Education International Conference (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 211-220).

Corder, S. P. (1981). Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford University Press, USA.

Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative (Vol. 7). Prentice Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ.

Dewi, Putriana. The Students’ability in Arranging Jumble Words at Mts Hasanah Pekanbaru. Diss. Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau, 2021.

Downing, A., & Locke, P. (2006). English grammar: A university course. Routledge.

Dulay, H. (1982). Language two. Oxford University Press, 200 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10016.

Erdoğan, V. (2005). Contribution of error analysis to foreign language teaching. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2).

Fischler, I., & Bloom, P. A. (1980). Rapid processing of the meaning of sentences. Memory & Cognition, 8(3), 216-225.

Gay, L.R et al (2009), Educational Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson

Hikmah, H. (2020). Analysis of omission and addition errors found in the students’ English texts. ELTICS: Journal of English Language Teaching and English Linguistics, 5(1).

James, C. (2013). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Routledge.

Mahendra, O., & Thresia, F. (2016, September). The Correlation Between Students’ Grammar Mastery and Their Ability in Arranging Jumbled Words into Good Sentence. In Sriwijaya University Learning and Education International Conference (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 835-850).

Mulyati, Y. (2002). Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia di kelas tinggi. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Petrov, S., Das, D., & McDonald, R. (2011). A universal part-of-speech tagset. arXiv preprint arXiv:1104.2086.

Schuster, B., Ruble, D. N., & Weinert, F. E. (1998). Causal inferences and the positivity bias in children: The role of the covariation principle. Child Development, 69(6), 1577-1596.

Setiyorini T. J., Dewi P., Masykuri E.S. (2020) The Grammatical Error Analysis Found in Students’ Composition. Lensa: Kajian Kebahasaan, Kesusastraan, dan Budaya.10(2), 218-233.

Sihombing P. S. (2019) The Effect of using Jumble Letters in Teaching Vocabulary in Grade Eight Students of SMP Negeri 7 Pematangsiantar. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences. 4(1), 34-38.

Sihotang, S. A. (2018). The Effect of Applying Jumble Words Strategy on A Text Use Flashcard as Media to The Students’ Achievement in Writing Narrative (Doctoral dissertation).

Sudibyo, P. Perbedaan penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif. In Seminar Kelas Mata Kuliah Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Islam Universitas Sunan Kalijaga (Hal. 1-9) (Vol. 23, p.2020).

Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Rahardjo, A., & Pertiwi, S. (2020). Learning motivation and students’ achievement in learning English. JELITA, 1(2), 56-64.

Taylor, J. R. (1982). The study of uncertainties in physical measurements. An Introduction to Error Analysis, 73.

Tias, U. P. (2019). The Effectiveness of Jumbled Sentences Technique to Improve the Students' Writing Skill at the Seventh Grade of SMPN 1 Sambit Ponorogo (Doctoral dissertation, IAIN Ponorogo).

Unseenpassage.com/. 2021. English Grammar Jumbled Words and Sentences Notes and Questions. Accessed on December 26,2021,

Wajszczuk, J. (2010). Functional class (so called" part of speech") assignment as a kind of meaning-bound word syntactic information. Cognitive Studies| Études cognitives, (10), 15-33.

Wati, Ira. 2019. The Students’s Ability in Arranging Jumbled Words into Simple Present Sentences at State Vocational High School 1 Pandalian IV Kota, Pakan Hulu Regency. Pekanbaru: UIN Suska Riau.

Yuliawati, L., & Andayani, E. S. (2020). Type of Error on Articles In Students’ Writing. Visi Sosial Humaniora, 1(2), 86-95.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 266 times
 PDF Downloaded : 87 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 syahmina syahmina

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.