Cognitive Level Analysis of English Semester Test for Grade X State Senior High Schools in Bukittinggi

Nadya Ismah Khairunnisa(1), M. Zaim(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2023 Nadya Ismah Khairunnisa

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v12i1.121764

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


This study aimed to explore the cognitive level of questions used by teachers on English semester tests for grade X academic year 2021/2022 at senior high schools in Bukittinggi and the problem faced by English teachers at senior high schools in Bukittinggi in constructing HOTS questions test. This research conducted by using descriptive method. The writer chose five senior high schools in Bukittinggi: SMAN 1 Bukittinggi, SMAN 2 Bukittinggi, SMAN 3 Bukittinggi, SMAN 5 Bukittinggi, and SMAN 5 Bukittinggi. In collecting the data, the writer used the document analysis and interview. From the data analysis, the writer found that English semester test made by teachers at senior high schools contained less HOTS questions where its only cover 12,9% or 23 questions out of 177 total questions. Lack of understanding and students’ readiness in receiving HOTS questions become the problem that faced by teachers in designing HOTS questions. According to the findings, the writer suggests teachers be more often involve HOTS questions into semester test. In addition, teachers should be provided with proper training related to HOTS in order to help teacher to be more familiar with designing HOTS questions.

References


Abkary, N. S., &Purnawarman, P. (2020). Indonesian EFL Teachers’ Challenges in Assessing Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 509, 482–489.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing. David McKay Company.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. David McKay.

Gilboy, M. B., Heinerichs, S., &Pazzaglia, G. (2015). Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 47(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008

Hoque, M. E. (2016). Three Domains of Learning: Cognitive, Affective and Psychomotor. In The Journal of EFL Education and Research (Vol. 2). www.edrc-jefler.org

Ramadhana, N. A., Rozimela, Y., &Fitrawati. (2018). High Order Thinking Skills-Based Questions in the Test Items Developed by Senior High School English Teachers of Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(4), 720–731. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jelt

Şener, N., Türk, C., &Taş, E. (2015). Improving Science Attitude and Creative Thinking through Science Education Project: A Design, Implementation and Assessment. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(4), 57–67. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v3i4.771

Syahdanis, J. D., Sofyan, D., & Yunita, W. (2021). Analysis of Hots in English Teacher-Made Test.Jurnal Basis, 8(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.33884/basisupb.v8i2.4479

Widana, I. W. (2017). Modul PenyusunanSoal HOTS. DirektoratPembinaan SMA.

Widiyaningsih, A., &Septiana, T. I. (2019). An Analysis of Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) in the National Examination of English Subject at Junior High School Level. ELT-Echo, 4(2), 138–146.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 63 times
 PDF Downloaded : 29 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Nadya Ismah Khairunnisa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.