English Teaching at SMAN 1 Bungo in Before, During, and After the Covid-19 Pandemic

Viona Chairina; Ainul Addinna

doi:10.24036/jelt.v11i4.120561

English Teaching at SMAN 1 Bungo in Before, During, and After the Covid-19 Pandemic

Viona Chairina⁽¹⁾, Ainul Addinna⁽²⁾,
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang

Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang

Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2022 Viona Chairina

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v11i4.120561

Full Text:

Language : en

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine about English teaching at SMAN 1 Bungo before, during, and after the covid 19 pandemic. This study used qualitative descriptive as its methodology. The population for this study were 3 teachers which had experience in teaching before, during, and after the Covid 19 pandemic at SMAN 1 Bungo. The researcher used a voice recorder to record the process of the Interview. Following data collection, there are six variables that became the focus in the research. The variable came from 4 books that have been released by Brown in Second Edition (2001) and Fifith Edition (2007), Scrivener (2010) in Third Edition, and Harmer (2001) in Third Edition. For the conclusion, Teachers 1, 2, and 3 in carrying out English language teaching were considered good because it used almost all of the variable that the experts suggested during before the pandemic. Meanwhile in the pandemic, the numerous limitations that students and teachers faced such as interaction between teacher and student only on WhatsApp and Portal Belajar Dari Rumah (BDR) and no direct learning. So, the implementation was not implemented much. And after the COVID-19 pandemic, teachers 1, 2, and 3 returned all the interact with students the same as before the pandemic.

Keywords

Teaching, English Teaching, Teaching by Principles, English Lesson, the Covid 19.

References

Asrori, Psikologi Pendidikan Pendekatan Multidisipliner, (Purwokerto: CV. Pena Persada, 2020), Cet. 1, h. 50. 11 Stephen P. Robb

Brown. H. D. (2001). PRINCIPLES of LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING. Fifth Edition.

Brown. H. D. (2001). TEACHING by PRINCIPLES. An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Second Edition.

Chomaidi & Salamah. (2018). Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran : Strategi Pembelajaran Sekolah (C. K. Untari (ed.)). PT. Grasindo.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design:Qualitative, Quantitative And Mix Methods Approaches. USA: Sage Publication.

E. Mulyasa. 2006. Implementasi Kurikulum 2004; Panduan Pembelajaran KBK. Bandung: Rosda Karya.

Fineout-Overholt E, Stillwell SB, Williamson KM, Cox JF III, Robbins BW.

Teaching evidence-based practice in academic settings. In: Melnyk BM,

Fineout-Overholt E, editors. Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: a guide to best practice. Philadelphia: Wolters

Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011. p. 291–329.

Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application. New York: Macmillan.

H. Douglas Brown, Teaching by Principles, an Interactive Approach to Languange Pedagogy (New York : Longman,2001) 47

Hariyati, S. (2015). Persepsi Masyarakat Terhadap Pembangunan Jembatan Mahkota II di Kota Samarinda. Ejournal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 3, 12

Harmer. J. (2001). THE PRACTICE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING. THIRD EDITION.

Johns, G., & Saks, A. M. (2019). Organizational behaviour: Understanding and managing life at work (11th ed.). Canada: Pearson Canada. Retrieved from http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=D6B28E4F781FE95FA351C79E2669E666

Kagan, D. (1992) Implications of research on teacher belief, Educational Psychologist, 27(1):65-90.

Mamik, Metodologi Kualitatif, (Sidoarjo: Zifatama Publisher, 2015), Cet.1, h. 135-136.

Maria Melani Ika Susanti, “Perbedaan Persepsi Guru Sekolah Dasar Berdasarkan Lama Mengajar Tentang Kurikulum 2013”, Elementary Journal, Vol.1, No. 2, 2019, h. 12-21.

Marsuha. 2007. Urgensi metode pembelajaran kooperatif dalam pembelajaran matematika pada siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Samudra Ilmu,2 (2):326-335.

Michael P. Breen dan Christopher N. Candlin, The essentials of communicative curriculum in language teaching dalam David R. Hall dan

Ann Hewings (editor), Innovative in English Language Teaching. (New York: Routledge, 2001), 9

Miles & Huberman, ibid., h. 15. 56

Miles & Huberman, Qualitative Data Analysis (terjemahan), (Jakarta : UI Press, 2007), h. 16.

Mohammad Ahyan Yusuf Sya’bani, Profesi Keguruan:Menjadi Guru yang Religius dan Bermartabat, (Gresik : Caremedia Communication, 2018), Cet. 1, h.32

Pajares, M. F. (1992) Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct, Review of Educational Research, 70:509-517.

Rizky Wuning Cahyani, Peningkatan Kemampuan Vocabulary Bahasa Inggris Menggunakan Media Scrabble Pada Kelas III MI Salafiyah Bahauddin Ngelom Taman Sidoarjo, Skripsi.: (Surabaya: UINSA, 2014), 13.

Robbins, S. P. (2010). Organizational Behaviour. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall.

Sadikin, A., dan Hamidah, A. 2020. Pembelajaran Daring di Tengah Wabah Covid19. Biodik. 6, (2), 214-224.

Salim dan Haidir, Penelitian Pendidikan: Metode, Pendekatan, dan Jenis, (Jakarta: Kencana, 2019), h. 113-115.

Scrrivener. J. (2010) Learning Teaching. The essential Guide to English Language Teaching. THIRD EDITION.

Stephen P. Robbins & Timothy A. Judge, Perilaku Organisasi 12th ed., (Jakarta: Salemba Empat, 2008), h. 175.

Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suharsimi Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian, (Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya, 2006), 206.

Sunarto dan Agung Hartono, Perkembangan Peserta Didik, (Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1999), 136.

Suryosubroto, B. 1997. Proses Belajar Mengajar di Sekolah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Umaroh, I. (2021). Problematika Pembelajaran Daring Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) Bagi Peserta Didik Di SMP Negeri 23 Surabaya. UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

Wahidmurni, Cara Mudah Menulis Proposal dan Laporan Penelitian Lapangan, (Malang: UM Press. 2017).

Yunitasari, R., & Hanifah, U. (2020). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Daring terhadap Minat Belajar Siswa pada Masa COVID 19. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v2i3 .142.