Students' Perceptions toward Synchronous Online Learning at the English Department of Universitas Negeri Padang
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang 
Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2022 Pitri Karismanda
DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v11i4.120421
Full Text: Language : en
Abstract
The researcher used random cluster sampling to pick out the sample. Data analysis showed that students had positive perceptions in terms of the teaching material and the student interaction aspect. Yet, they had negative perceptions about the aspect of the learning environment. The students claimed, in terms of learning environment, synchronous learning created a monotonous learning atmosphere they felt bored, unfocused and easily distracted. Therefore, it could be concluded that, if among the synchronous learning aspects, one aspect was perceived negatively, there was a possibility that the learning process was not yet optimal. Thus, it was suggested that the learning environment aspect should be given more attention to due to its impact on students’ learning process.
References
Al Ikhlas. (2021). Students’ perception on synchronous english language learning during covid-19.
Atmojo, A. N., & Priyo, A. E. (2020). Keywords : digital learning of English ; EFL learners ‟ perception ; English activities beyond classroom ; social networking sites . JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 7(2), 219-243, 7(2), 219–243.
Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., & Webster, J.(2003). Applicant reactions to face-to-face and technology-mediated interviews: A field investigation. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 944–953.
Dada et al. (2019). An investigation into the effectiveness of Asynchronous and Synchronous E-learning mode on students academic performance in national open University (NOUN). Modern Education and Computer Science Press, 5, 54–64.
Faruq, A. Z. Al, Ngadiso, N., & Supriyadi, S. (2022). Students ’ Perceptions of Synchronous Online Learning using Google Meet in a Reading Class. 14, 4053–4066. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v14i3.1937
Hagi, L. (2021a). Students’ perception toward the use of zoom as sychronous learning platform for master in English Language education at University of Muhammadiyah Malang during COVID-19 pandemic.
Howe christine. (2007). Children social development, peer interaction and classroom learning.
Hughes A. (2014). Comparing Asynchronous and Synchronous Learning.
Jena, P.(2020). Online learning during lockdown period for covid-19 in India. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research, 82–92.
Keegan et al. (2005). Virtual clasrooms in education provision: Synchronous e-learning systems for european institutions. FernUniversität, 126.
Kemdikbud RI. (2020). Keputusan bersama menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, Menteri Agama, Menteri Kesehatan, dan Menteri dalam negeri Republik Indonesia. 53 (9), 1689–1699.
Malik et al. (2017). Students’ perspectives about asynchronous and synchronous resources at Higher Education level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 2, 183–195.
Natsir, R. Y. (2016). Improving Students’ Speaking Ability By Using Synchronous Communication Strategy. Exposure : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris, 5(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.26618/ejpbi.v5i2.844
Perdanakusuma, H., Dewi, P., & Saputro, W. T. (2022). SYNCHRONOUS LEARNING IN SPEAKING CLASS : ENGLISH AS A FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNERS ’ VOICES. 16(July), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i1.7867
Salmon. (2013). The key to active online learning. Routledge, (7), 323.
Article Metrics
Abstract Views : 700 timesPDF Downloaded : 42 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Pitri Karismanda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.