Gender Differences in Structuring Spoken Personal Experiences amongst Vocational High School EFL Students (A Study at SMK Negeri 3 Padang

Yuliana Fitri(1), Hamzah Hamzah(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2022 Yuliana Fitri

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v11i4.119614

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


Although there have been many studies that have analysed gender differences, only a few studies have compared the differences between male and female students in structuring spoken personal experience, according to the use of generic structure. This research aimed to analyse how gender differences in structuring the spoken experience based on the use of generic structure. This research used descriptive method and used speaking task as instrument. The sample was ten male students and ten female students from the first grade students of SMK Negeri 3 Padang in the academic year 2021/2022. This research used the Labov’s narrative theory to analyse the data.  The result of this research showed that they tended to put more focus in the using of orientation, complicating action, and coda, and they paid less attention in the use of abstract, evaluation and resolution in structuring the spoken experience. Furthermore, both of students tended to be more complete on complicating action element (100%), while the male students tended to be very incomplete on abstract element (40%) and the female students tended to be very incomplete on evaluation element (10%). 

Keywords


Speaking, personal experience, gender differences, generic structure

References


Erdiana, N. (2019). Male vs. Female Students: Who is Better in Speaking Skill?. Studies in English Language Education, 06(01).

Gerot, L. & Wignell, P. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney

Antipodean Educational Enterprises (AEE).

Park G, Yaden DB, Schwartz HA, Kern ML, Eichstaedt JC, Kosinski M, et al. (2016)

Women are Warmer but No Less Assertive than Men: Gender and Language

on Facebook. PLoS ONE, 11(5).

Putri, D.E., Putri, K.H., & Putri, E.Y. (2017). Language and gender: A conversation

analysis in the difference of language related to gender. ISELT-5.

Renkema, J., & Schubert, C. (2018). Introduction to Discourse Studies, New Edition.

Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Rosdiana. (2021). Student Performance: Assessing Students’ Writing Practice.

Almufi Journal if Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation Education (AJMAEE), 01(02).

Saragih, E., Hutabarat, E., Situmorang, M., Sembiring, S., & Panjaitan,Y. (2019).

Comparative Analysis of Male and Female in Writing Recount Text. Jurnal

Handayani, 10(02).

Suhartini, Y.E. (2019). The Analysis of Grammatical Problems and Generic

Structure of Narrative Text Written by the Eleventh Graduated Students of Language Program at SMAK ST.Klaus Werang-West Florest. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 11(01).

Wahyuningsih, S. (2018). Men and Women Differences in Using Language: A Case

Study of Students at Stain Kudus. Journal of English Education, Literature, and Culture, 03(01).

Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, Fifth Edition. United

Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 60 times
 PDF Downloaded : 34 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Yuliana Fitri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.