Students’ Perception of Using Zoom Meeting for English Microteaching Class

Cindy Aulia Afrijon; Nur Rosita

doi:10.24036/jelt.v11i3.118857

Students’ Perception of Using Zoom Meeting for English Microteaching Class

Cindy Aulia Afrijon⁽¹⁾, Nur Rosita⁽²⁾,
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang

Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang

Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2022 cindy aulia afrijon, nur rosita rosita

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v11i3.118857

Full Text:

Language : en

Abstract

The process of changing learning produces a variety of different views. This study aims to reveal students' perceptions of using the zoom meeting application for online microteaching classes through pedagogical, socio-cultural, and technical aspects. The population in this study were twenty (20) 3^rd-year students of the English education study program who had attended microteaching classes and of course were able to provide their views and opinions. It can be concluded that students have a relatively positive perception of using the zoom meeting application for online microteaching class. The results of the study represent the positive result in carrying out microteaching lectures online. Even though the lectures are conducted online, they lecture still runs according to the standard. For interactive learning applications that are used, students seem happy to use the Zoom Meeting application as a learning medium because apart from being practical and simple, zoom meetings also rarely cause problems that are difficult to handle.

Keywords

English, Language Teaching, Online Learning

References

Abdullah, A., Nugraha, W., Sutiyo, S., Setiawan, R. F., Saputra, M. I. D., & Putra, R. P. (2021). Learning Media Development: FireDroid Application Base on the Android System and Distance Learning. Journal of Airport Engineering Technology (JAET), 2(01), 33–39.

Akmal, H., & Susanto, H. (2018). Efektivitas penggunaan aplikasi pembelajaran berbasis mobile smartphone sebagai media pengenalan sejarah lokal masa revolusi fisik Di Kalimantan Selatan Pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Historia, 6(2), 197–206.

Al-Nouh, N. A., Abdul-Kareem, M. M., & Taqi, H. A. (2015). EFL College Students’ Perceptions of the Difficulties in Oral Presentation as a Form of Assessment. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 136–150.

Almaiah, M. A. (2018). Acceptance and usage of a mobile information system services in University of Jordan. Education and Information Technologies, 23(5), 1873–1895.

Angelina, L. (2020). Strategi Pengelolaan Zoom Meeting Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Dimasa Pandemi. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi (JUKANTI), 3(2), 27–32.

Arikunto, S. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen penelitian dan penilaian program. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Atmojo, A. E. P., & Nugroho, A. (2020). EFL classes must go online! Teaching activities and challenges during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. Register Journal, 13(1), 49–76.

Azizah, N., & Rahmi, E. (2019). Persepsi Mahasiswa Tentang Peranan Mata Kuliah Micro Teaching Terhadap Kesiapan Mengajar Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Ekonomi UNP. Jurnal Ecogen, 2(2), 197–205.

Basilaia, G., & Kvavadze, D. (2020). Transition to online education in schools during a SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in Georgia. Pedagogical Research, 5(4).

Chowdhary, R. (2019). Microteaching in India: Features and Importance. Global Initiatives for Sustainable Development: Issues and Strategies, 154.

Cornesse, C., Blom, A. G., Dutwin, D., Krosnick, J. A., De Leeuw, E. D., Legleye, S., Pasek, J., Pennay, D., Phillips, B., & Sakshaug, J. W. (2020). A review of conceptual approaches and empirical evidence on probability and nonprobability sample survey research. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 8(1), 4–36.

Dixon, R. A., Hall, C., & Shawon, F. (2019). Using virtual reality and web conferencing technologies: Exploring alternatives for microteaching in a rural region. Northwest Journal of Teacher Education, 14(1), 4.

Donnelly, R., & Fitzmaurice, M. (2011). Towards productive reflective practice in microteaching. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(3), 335–346.

Economides, A. A. (2008). Requirements of mobile learning applications. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 5(5), 457–479.

Ellis, T. J., & Levy, Y. (2009). Towards a Guide for Novice Researchers on Research Methodology: Review and Proposed Methods. Issues in Informing Science & Information Technology, 6.

Ellis, Y. G., Cliff, D. P., & Okely, A. D. (2018). Childcare educators’ perceptions of and solutions to reducing sitting time in young children: A qualitative study. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(4), 377–385.

G Lodico, M. (2006). Methods in educational research.

Gibson, J. J. (1985). Conclusions from a century of research on sense perception.

Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26.

Griffiths, J. (2016). Bridging the school placement gap with peer micro-teaching lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies.

Gunawan, G., Purwoko, A. A., Ramdani, A., & Yustiqvar, M. (2021). Pembelajaran menggunakan learning management systemberbasis moodle pada masa pandemi covid-19. Indonesian Journal of Teacher Education, 2(1), 226–235.

Gunawardena, C. N. (1995). Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(2), 147–166.

Helda, T., & Zaim, M. (2021). Effectiveness of The Zoom Meeting Applications In Micro Teaching Lectures In The Pandemictime COVID-19. English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings, 4, 128–135.

Hertanto, E. (2017). Perbedaan skala Likert lima skala dengan. metodologi penelitian, 2.,(September), 2–3.

Hüsken, F., & Koning, J. (2006). Between two worlds: Social security in Indonesia. In Ropewalking and Safety Nets (pp. 1–26). Brill.

Krämer, A. (2015). Research design. In Low-Income Consumers as a Source of Innovation (pp. 91–131). Springer.

Kranz, M., Möller, A., Diewald, S., Roalter, L., Beege, B., Meyer, B. E., & Hendrich, A. (2013). Mobile and contextual learning: a case study on mobile didactics in teaching and education. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 7(2), 113–139.

Lan, W., & Lam, R. (2020). Exploring an efl teacher’s beliefs and practices in teaching topical debates in mainland China. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 25–44.

Ledger, S., Ersozlu, Z., & Fischetti, J. (2019). Preservice teachers’ confidence and preferred teaching strategies using TeachLivETM virtual learning environment: A two-step cluster analysis. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(3), em1674.

Lee, A. R. (2021). Breaking through digital barriers: Exploring EFL students’ views of Zoom breakout room experiences. Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics, 21(1), 510–524.

Mankar, M. J., Pimparkar, M., & Dubhashi, S. (2022). Snap-shot of microteaching as a teaching–learning method among health professionals in university of health sciences, Navi Mumbai.

Marsedes, M., & Syukur, Y. (2021). Factors Causing Student Learning Difficulties in Following Online Learning and Teacher Guidance and Counseling Efforts to Overcome Them. Current Issues in Counseling, 1(1), 8–18.

Morgan, D. L. (1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 129–152.

Mustopa, A. J. M. J., & Hidayat, D. (2020). Pengalaman mahasiswa saat kelas online menggunakan aplikasi zoom cloud meeting selama covid-19. Jurnal Digital Media Dan Relationship, 2(2), 75–84.

Peelen, M. V, Atkinson, A. P., & Vuilleumier, P. (2010). Supramodal representations of perceived emotions in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(30), 10127–10134.

Pham, N. K. T. (2022). Vietnamese Students’ Perspectives on Online Micro-Teaching (OMT) as a Technique in English Teacher Education in the 4.0 Era. AsiaCALL Online Journal, 13(1), 40–72.

Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as agents of change: Teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum. Reinventing the Curriculum: New Trends in Curriculum Policy and Practice, 187–206.

Puspaningtyas, N. D., & Dewi, P. S. (2020). Persepsi peserta didik terhadap pembelajaran berbasis daring. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 3(6), 703–712.

Qiong, O. U. (2017). A brief introduction to perception. Studies in Literature and Language, 15(4), 18–28.

Rahmawati, R., & Putri, E. M. I. (2020). Learning from home dalam perspektif persepsi mahasiswa era pandemi covid-19. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Hardiknas, 1, 17–24.

Rismiyanto, R., & Suryani, F. B. (2021). THE BEST MICROTEACHING PRACTICE PLATFORM: OFFLINE, ZOOM, OR WHATSAPP GROUP? Prominent, 4(2), 81–87.

Riyaz, A., Musthafa, H. S., Abdul Raheem, R., & Moosa, S. (2020). Survey sampling in the time of social distancing experiences from a quantitative research in the wake of COVID 19 pandemic.

Robbins, J. (2013). Arts of Perception: The Epistemological Mentality of the Spanish Baroque, 1580-1720. Routledge.

Roza, V. (2021). Incorporating both Zoom and YouTube in Micro Teaching Class during the Covid-19 Pandemic: An Effectiveness Investigation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1779(1), 12033.

Setiadi, M. A. (2020). STUDENTS’PERCEPTION ON THE USE OF GOOGLE CLASSROOM IN LANGUAGE LEARNING. Department of English, Muhammadiyah University of Makassar Sultan Alauddin ….

Sihotang, H., & Simorangkir, S. T. (2020). Buku pedoman praktik microteaching. UKI Press.

Sipayung, Y. R., & Wibawa, K. C. S. (2020). The role of information technology toward the development of online learning process in covid-19 pandemic period in Indonesia. PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(4), 948–958.

Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (1990). Conceptual model of the quality perception process. Journal of Business Research, 21(4), 309–333.

Sufirmansyah, S., Prameswati, L. N., Wati, D. T., & Sulistyowati, E. (2021). Student’s preferences in using video-based learning applications and its efficiency in higher education. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(2), 272–283.

Sugihartini, N., Wahyuni, D. S., & Dewi, K. S. (2021). Content development of flipped classroom-based for microteaching course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1810(1), 12039.

Sugiyono, M. (2008). Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suryani, F. B., & Rismiyanto, R. (2021). The effect of microteaching lesson study on the beliefs of EFL student teachers. EduLite: Journal of English Education, Literature and Culture, 6(1), 1–9.

Susilana, R. (n.d.). MODUL 6 POPULASI DAN SAMPEL 6 POPULASI DAN SAMPEL 6 POPULASI DAN SAMPEL.

Thomas, C. (2017). Microteaching: A Review.

Wargadinata, W., Maimunah, I., Eva, D., & Rofiq, Z. (2020). Student’s responses on learning in the early COVID-19 pandemic. Tadris: Journal of Education and Teacher Training, 5(1), 141–153.

Zainura, S. (2019). Student’s perception on the use of English as a medium of instruction. Thesis, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training Islamic State University