1. Home
  2. Vol 11, No 1 (2022)
  3. Hayuni

The Analysis of Students’ Common Errors in Constructing Passive Voice in Explanation Text by English Department Students in Universitas Negeri Padang

Rahma Hayuni(1), Witri Oktavia(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2022 Rahma Hayuni

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v11i1.116320

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


This study was aimed to describe students’ common errors in constructing passive voice in explanation text by English Department Students of Universitas Negeri Padang who took Academic Writing class. It was aimed to find students common errors in writing explanation text. This research was descriptive method research. The sample of this research was the K2-K5 2019 students. The research was taken based on simple random sampling. This research was conducted by using students’ final writing test in academic writing from 27 students in order to find the common error in students’ writing. The finding show that the most common error made by the students’ in constructing passive voice were omission error with 47 errors with 22 omission errors in auxiliary be, 20 omission errors in auxiliary to be and 5 omission errors in preposition. Misinformation errors 24 errors in total with 18 errors in misinformation auxiliary, 5 errors in misinformation past participle

References


Arikunto, S. 2006. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Bennet, A., Carter, A., & Marino, D. (2013). The Genre Handbook for Staff! London: Department of Education and Child Development.

Bungin, P. D. H. B., & Sos, S. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif: Edisi Kedua. Kencana.

Chele, M. I. (2015). An analysis of subject agreement errors in English: The case of third year students at the National University of Lesotho. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 4(1), 32-40.

Diehl, P. L., & Gay, L. R. (1992). Research methods for business and management. New York McMillan.

Hahn, J. W. (2006). Exploring Korean EFL university students’ perceptions of grammar instruction. ENGLISH TEACHING (영어교육), 61(3), 29-43.

Kristina, M., & Ngadiman, A. (2017). Errors of Passive Voice Construction Found in the Explanation Composition of English Department Students. Magister Scientiae, (41), 68-88.

Kusumawardhani, P. (2017). The analysis of errors of omission in english narrative composition made by EFL students. JELE (Journal of English Language and Education), 3(2), 84-96.

Lubis, B. N. A., Afrilyani, T. P., Girsang, S. W., Sihite, B. M. T., Chandra, S., & Permadi, A. (2019). An Error Analysis On Changing Active Voice Into Passive Voice At Ninth Grade Of Smp Amir Hamzah Medan. EduTech: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial, 5(2).

Nicol, J. L., Forster, K. I., & Veres, C. (1997). Subject–verb agreement processes in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 36(4), 569-587.

Norrish, J. (1983) Language Learners and Their Errors. London: Macmillan Press.

Princess, P., Saun, S., & Adnan, A. (2018). An Analysis of the Second Year English Department Students' Errors in Using Passive Voice in the Academic Writing Subject of Universitas Negeri Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 7(3), 480-489.

Purpura, J. E. (2004). Assessing grammar (Vol. 8). Cambridge University Press.

Qodir, A. (2006). An Error Analysis on changing active voice into passive voice. Himmah, 7(18), 1-17.

Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.

Yasim, S., Hasnawiah, H., & Roni, R. (2018). Error analysis in using passive voice. EDUVELOP, 2(1), 48-56.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 264 times
 PDF Downloaded : 121 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Rahma Hayuni

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.