The Effect of Fishbone Method on Students Writing Ability of Report Text

Ilza Emilda(1), Hamzah Hamzah(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2021 Ilza Emilda

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v10i4.114903

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


This research was a quasi-experimental study, which aimed to find out the empirical evidence of the effect of using Fishbone method on students’ writing ability of report text. The population of this research was all students of class XI of SMA Negeri 1 Tanjung Raya. The researcherused the sample of two classes that were chosen as the sample by using cluster random sampling. The samples were taken from 25 students of experimental group (class XI MIA-1) and 25 students of control group (class XI MIA-3). The instrument of this research was a writing test. T-test was used to analyze the data collected in this research. The result of T-test indicated thatsig (2-tailed) of the experimental class (0.000) was lower than sig  or tobservedwas higher than ttable (). While sig (2-tailed) of the control class (0.000) was lower than sig  or tobservedwas higher than ttable(. It can be concluded that the students who are taught by using the Fishbone method have higher results than the students who are taught by using the conventional teaching method. It means the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted and the null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected. Thus, Fishbone method produces higher results on students' writing ability of report text rather than conventional teaching method.

Keywords


Writing, report text, and fishbone method

References


Anderson, Mark and Khaty, Anderson. (1997). Text Types in English. New York: Macmillan.

Creswell, John W. (2008). Education Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Third Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

Gerot, L., and Wignell, P. (1994). Making Sense of Functional Grammar. Sydney: GerdStabler.

Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and Second Language Writing. USA: University of Michigan Press.

Knapp, P & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, Text, Grammar: Technologies for Teaching and Assessing Writing. Sydney NSW: University of New South Wales Press Ltd.

Mackey, A. and Gass, S.M. (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and design. London: Routledge.

Mirlohi, M., Ketabi, S., & Roustaei, M. (2012). The effect of instruction on writing performance of intermediate EFL Persian students. International Journal of Linguistics, Vol 4 No. 4, p.325.

Nasir. (2014). Fishbone Strategy In Teaching English In Indonesia: A Tool Organizer For Learning EFL Reading. The second international conference on education and language, pp.160-165.

Ningsih, I. S. & Rosa, R. N. (2013). Research Based Writing as a Technique in Writing a Report Text to Senior High School. Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol 1 No. 2. pp. 21-27.

Peregoy, S. F. & Boyle, O. (2008). Reading, Writing, and learning in ESL: A Resource Book for Teaching K-12 English Learners, 5th Edition. California: San Jose University.

Rass, R. A. (2001). Integrating reading and writing for effective language teaching. English Teaching Forum, 39, 1–5.

Rass, R. A. (2001). Integrating Reading and Writing for Effective Language Teaching. English Teaching Forum, 39, pp.1-5.

Safitri, Aulia (2016), The Influence of Using Fishbone Ishikawa to Improve Students' Writing Skills of First Semester Students of English Education Program Teacher Training and Education Faculty Universitas Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Linguistika, Oktober 2016, Volume 7, No 2. pp. 44-47.

Sidabutar, L. (2016). The Effect of Fishbone Strategy on Students’ Achievement in Writing Analytical Exposition Text. Journal of English Language Teaching of FBS UNIMED, Vol 5, No. 3. pp. 150-160.

Sufeni, M. & Fatimah, S. (2018). Using Fishbone Diagram to Teach Writing Discussion Text to Senior High School Students. JELT Vol 7 No 3 September 2018. pp. 549-555.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 279 times
 PDF Downloaded : 114 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Ilza Emilda

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.