Analysis of Theme in Discussion Text Written by the Second Year Students of English Department of UNP
![](/public/amplop.jpg)
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang 
![](http://journal.redwhitepress.com/public/country.png)
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang 
![](http://journal.redwhitepress.com/public/country.png)
![](/public/amplop.jpg)
Copyright (c) 2020 Susi Guslita Putri
DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v9i4.110560
Full Text:
![](/public/downloadpdf.png)
Abstract
Keywords
References
Al Bakaa, A., J. (2015) Functional Analysis of Marked and Unmarked Theme in Demonstrating a Critical Argument Written by Iraqi and Australian Posgraduate Students. School of Education, Monash University : Australia.
Anderson, M. & Anderson, K. (1997).Text types in English 1. South Yarra: Macmillan.
Bloor, T., & Bloor, M. (2004).The functional analysis of English: A Hallidayan approach. (2nd Ed). London: Arnold.
Boardman, C.A. &Frydenberg, J. (2002).Writing to communicate: Paragraph and essays. 2nd Edition. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Butt, David et al. (2000).Using functional grammar: An explorer’s guide. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G.E. & Airasian, P. (2000). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application Sixth Edition. New jersey : prentice hall inch
Gunawan, W. & Aziza, F. (2017). Theme and thematic progression of undergraduate thesis: Investigating meaning making in academic writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 7(2), pp. 413-424.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar.3th edition. London and New York: Routledge.
Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jing, W. (2015).Theme and thematic progression in English writing teaching.Journal of Education and Practice, Vol. 6(21), pp. 178-187.
Langan, J. (1997). College Writing Skills with Readings. New York: The McGrow-Hill Companies, Inc.
Rijlaarsdam, G., Bergh, H., &Couzijn, M.(Eds.) (2004). Effective learning and teaching of writing: A handbook of writing in education second education. Berlin: Springer.
Rosa, R. N. (2007a). Thematic progression as a means to keep cohesion in exposition texts. JurnalBahasadanSeni, Vol. 8(2), pp. 94-100.
Rosa, R. N. (2007b). Analisis fungsi tekstual dalam surat kabar harian “Haluan”. Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa 1(1), 56-65
Rosa, R. N. (2013). Thematic progression as a model used to keep cohesion in writing an exposition text. SELT 2013 Proceeding, pp. 220-228.
Rustipa, K. (2010). Theme-rheme organization of learners’ texts. DinamikaBahasadanIlmuBudaya, Vol.4, pp. 1-17.
Wang, L. (2007). Theme & rheme in the thematic organization of text: Implications for teaching academic writing. Asian EFL Journal. Vol. 9(1), pp. 164-176.
Witte, S. P. &Faigley, L. (1981).Coherence, cohesion, and writing quality.College Composition and Communication, Vol. 32(2), pp. 189-204.
Yang, X. (2008).Thematic progression analysis in teaching explanation writing.English Language Teaching, Vol. 1(1), pp. 29-33.
Yunita, S. (2017). Theme and thematic progression in students’ recount text, Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics,Vol 7(3),pp.524-530.
Syahrizal, T., Fitrian, L. &Anggraeni, N. (2018). Thematic progression analysis of students writing. Jurnal Siliwangi: Seri Pendidikan, Vol 4(1), pp. 41-53.
Article Metrics
![](/public/grafik.png)
![](/public/pdf.jpg)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Susi Guslita Putri
![Creative Commons License](http://licensebuttons.net/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.