An Analysis of Teachers’classroom Language at SMPN 4 Muara Bungo
(1) Padang State University  Indonesia
(2) Padang State University  Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2020 Monica Sinta Bella, Yetty Zainil
DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v9i4.110200
Full Text: Language : en
Abstract
In the past two decades, there has been a significant increase in classroom interaction research on language use in the classroom. However, studies investigating teachers’ classroom language for junior high school are hard to find. The present research aims to figure out (1) teachers’ classroom language occurs in the teaching and learning process, and (2) teachers’ reflection on their classroom language. The study employed qualitative descriptive research with the three teachers of SMPN 4 Muara Bungo as the participants. Observation and Stimulated Recall Interview (SIR) were used to conduct the data, and the data were analyzed by using Salaberri’s handbook of classroom language (1995). The result of this study showed that teachers spoke six types out of 8 types of classroom language suggested by Sallaberi, namely simple instruction, dealing with the language of spontaneous situation, the language of social interaction, pair group work, question types, and dealing with error. However, the average of teacher’s English classroom language use showed a low percentage, which was only 45,4%. It proved that teachers in this study did not provide comprehensible input to their students. Through a stimulated recall interview, the teachers admitted that they are still not optimal in providing input to the students. It was because of two reasons: (1) students’ proficiency and (2) teachers’ proficiency themselves.
Keywords
References
Bilash, O. (2011). Classroom Language. Improving Second language Education. Retrieved from https://sites.educ.ualberta.ca/staff/olenka.bilash/best%20of20%Bilash/clas sroom %20language.html on February 2, 2020.
Burazin, M. (2018). What Is a Classroom Language? Quora. Retrieved from https://www.quora.com/What-is-a-classroom-language
Canh, L. V., & Renandya, W. A. (2017). Teachers’ English Proficiency and Classroom Language Use: A conversation Analysis Study. RELC Journal. 48(1), 67-81. Oxford: Heinemann Publisher.
Foster, P., Tonkyn, A. & Wigglesworth, G. (2000). Measuring Spoken Language: A
Unit for all Reasons. Applied Linguistics. 21: 354-75.
Gorhan, V. P,. Richmond, J., & Wrench, J.S. (2009). Communication, Affect, & Learning in the Classroom. 3rd Edition. California: Creative Common
Gass, S.M & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated Recall Methodology in Second Language Research. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Heath, S. B. (1978). Teacher Talk: Language in the Classroom. Arlington, Virgihia : the Center for Applied Linguistics
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. New York: Pergamon Press.
Polio, C. G., & Duff, P. A. (1994). Teachers’ language Use in University Foreign Language Classroom: A Qualitative Analysis of English and Target Language Alternation. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 313-326.
Rabbidge, M., & Chappel, P. (2014). Exploring Non-native English Speaker Teachers’ Classroom Language Use in South Korea Elementary Schools. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 17(4), 1-18.
Salaberri, S. (1995). Handbooks for the English Classroom. Classroom Language. Oxford: Heinemann Publisher
Wilen, W. W. (1987) Questions, Questioning Techniques, and Effective Teaching. Washington, D.C: National Education Association of the United States.
Zainil, Y. (2019). An Analysis of Language Input in EFL Classrooms at Junior High School in Padang. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 276, 23-32.
Article Metrics
Abstract Views : 771 timesPDF Downloaded : 249 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Monica Sinta Bella, Yetty Zainil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.