The Use of Cohesive Devices in Academic Writing Written by English Language and Literature Department Students

Elvia Wilfitri(1), Sitti Fatimah(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of English Language Teaching

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v9i3.109340

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


This research was aimed to find out and analyse the type of Cohesive Devices used, and errors made by English Department Students at Universitas Negeri Padang in academic writing. This research was classified as descriptive qualitative research. The instruments used in this research were students’ writing task documents and tables. The documents were the students’ final academic writing products in the forms of mini theses focusing on the background of the problem. The data was taken by simple random sampling which resulting 25 academic writing product of English Department Student at Universitas Ngeri Padang of academic year 2017. The results in this research showed that the students use all types of the cohesive devices, but they only use a small amount of examples from each the types. Next, there are 102 transitions signals are used appropriately and 36 were used inappropriately. Then, 368 repetitions of key words or nouns are used appropriately and 25 are used inappropriately. The last 447 consistent pronouns are appropriately used and 115 are appropriately used.


Keywords


Academic writing, Cohesive Devices, Transitional Signals, Repetition of Key Words or Nouns, Pronouns

References


Alley, M. (2018). The Craft of Scientific Writing (4th Edition). New York, NY 10013, USA: Springer.

Astanti, R., Yenni, R. & Fitrawati. (2016). Cohesive Devices in Discussion Text Writteb By The Students of SMAN 12 Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol. 5, no.1, 2016, pp. 34. Padang: Universitas Negeri Padang.

Bailey, S. (2011). Academic Writing: A hand Book for International Students (3rd Edition). New York: Routledge.

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. White Plains, NY 10606, USA: Longman.

Crossley, S. A. & McNamara, D. S. (2016). Say more and be more coherent: How text elaboration and cohesion can increase writing quality. Journal of Writing Research, Vol. 7, no 3, pp. 351-370. Atlanta, USA: Georgia State University.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E. & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational Research Competencies for Analysys and Applications (9th Edition). New Jersey: Percentice Hall.

Hatcher, D. & Lane, G. (2005). The Writing Process: A Step-by-Step Approach for Everyday Writers (Tools for Everyday Writers). United States of America: LandaBooks.

Jordan, R. R. (1999). Academic Writing Course: Study Skill in English (3rd Edition). UK: Longman.

Oshima, A. & Ann, H. (2007). Introduction to Academic Writing: the longman academic writing series (3rd Edition). White Plains, NY 10606, USA: Pearson Education.

Sawalmeh, M. H. M. (2013). Error Analysis of Written English Essays: The case of Students of the Preparatory Year Program in Saudi Arabia. English for Specific Purposes World, Issue 40, vol. 14, 2013, P. 5. Saudi Arabia: University of Ha’il.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 337 times
 PDF Downloaded : 97 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of English Language Teaching

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.