Error Analysis in Writing Discussion Text Made by Students at English Department of Universitas Negeri Padang
![](/public/amplop.jpg)
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang 
![](http://journal.redwhitepress.com/public/country.png)
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang 
![](http://journal.redwhitepress.com/public/country.png)
![](/public/amplop.jpg)
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of English Language Teaching
DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v8i3.105228
Full Text:
![](/public/downloadpdf.png)
Abstract
Grammar error is one of the difficulties experienced by students in the writing process. The main objective in this study was to find the usual grammar mistakes made by English language students in 2017 at Padang State University in writing discussion texts. Theoretically, this research was conducted to identify, classify and show the proportion of each type of error made by students. The type of research used is qualitative research with descriptive methods. The research subjects were students of English language education at Universitas Negeri Padang, specifically students in the K.2-2017 class. The instrument used is documentation of student writing about discussion text. All grammatical errors that appear in student writing are analyzed using the Surface Strategy Taxonomy introduced by Dulay et.al. The findings showed that the total error is 260 errors. Most errors were omission (50 errrors / 50.77%), second place was misformation error (75 errors / 28.85%), third place was addition error (39 errrors / 15%), and the last was misordering error (14 error / 5.38%). Based on these results, it can be concluded that students still experience great difficulties in learning the grammar structure in the writing process.
Keywords
References
Abushihab, Ibrahim. 2014. An Analysis of Grammatical Errors in Writing Made by Turkish Learners of English as a Foreign Language. International Journal of Linguistics. Vol. 6, No. 4. 214
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (2nd ed.). London: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Brown, Douglas. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New York: Longman
Cholipah. (2014). Skripsi. An Analysis of Students’ Error in Writing Recount Text (A Case Study in the Second Grade Students of SMP
Trimulia, Jakarta). Jakarta: State Islamic University of Jakarta
Desta Tririzki Liasari. (2017). Skripsi. An Analysis Of Students’ Grammatical Errors In Writing Report Text At Second Grade Of Senior High School. Indonesia: University Of Lampung
Ellis, R. and Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing Learner Language. China: Oxford University Press.
Erdogan, (2005). Contribution of error analysis to foreign language teaching. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education. 1(2), 261-270.
Nezami, A. (2012). Common Error Types of Iranian Learners of English. Journal of English Language Teaching. Vol. 5. No. 3. 160-170.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (2005). Language and meaning: Data collection in qualitative research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 137-145.
Richard, Jack C., and Willy A. Renandya. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching; An Anthology of Current Practice : Cambridge University Press.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Article Metrics
![](/public/grafik.png)
![](/public/pdf.jpg)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of English Language Teaching
![Creative Commons License](http://licensebuttons.net/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.