Kesantunan Berbahasa Pengamat Politik Rocky Gerung dalam Mengkritik Pemerintah dalam Kanal Youtube

Khairurrizki Khairurrizki, Agustina Agustina

Abstract


This research was motivated by the delivery of criticism towards the government which is considered less polite by some circles. The purpose of this study is to explain the politeness in the language of RG political observers when criticizing the government. This type of research is qualitative research. The method used in this research is descriptive method. The main instrument is the researcher himself. The data of this research is in the form of speeches by political observers of the RG which contain criticism of the government. The data source for this research is the RG YouTube channel. The data collection technique used is the observation and note taking technique. The data validation technique used in this study is triangulation. Technical data analysis is carried out by analyzing data according to the theoretical studies used to answer research questions that have been formulated. The research results show that. First, GM political observers in criticizing the government tend to use speech acts of direct criticism, although they sometimes use indirect criticism. Second, in criticizing RG, the dominant uses the maxim of praise, then agreement, and wisdom. However, RG tends to violate the politeness principles, especially the maxims of praise. This is because the criticism given tends to be direct without paying attention to the face of the speech partner or being criticized by RG.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustina. 1995. Pragmatik Dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Padang: UNP Press.

Alakrash, Hussien Mohamad, and Elaf Saad Bustan. 2020. “Politeness Strategies Employed by Arab EFL and Malaysian ESL Students in Making Request.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 10 (6). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i6/7257.

Arisandi, Rosi, Charlina Charlina, and Hadi Rumadi. 2021. “Tindak Tutur Direktif Rocky Gerung Dalam Acara Indonesia Lawyers Club.” Jurnal Tuah: Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran Bahasa 3 (1): 15–23.

Azman, Intan Norjahan, Azman Yusof, Marlyna Maros, and Kesumawati Abu Bakar. 2020. “Language Politeness in Malay Culture in Malaysia.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 10 (9). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i9/7864.

Behnam, Biook, and Behzad Mahmoudy. 2013. “A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Reports Issued by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Director General on Iran’s Nuclear Program during the Last Decade.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3 (12). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.12.2196-2201.

Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2018. Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics: Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage Series Number 4: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511813085.

Emeraldien, F. Z., E. C. L. Tobing, M. M. Efendi, and F. K. Diarsa. 2020. “Analisis Wacana Kritis Pada FTV “Karena Netijen Kulari Ke Desa".” VoxPop 2 (1): 64–76.

Leech, Geoffrey. 1993. Prinsip Prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: UI Press.

Mogashoa, Tebogo. 2014. “Understanding Critical Discourse Analysis in Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences 1 (7): 104–13.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2011. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mukhlis, Muhammad, Akbar Al Masjid, Heny Kusuma Widyanimgrum, Kokom Komariah, and Sumarlam. 2020. “Analisis Wacana Kritis Model Teun A. Van Dijk Pada Surat Kabar Online Dengan Tajuk Kilas Balik Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh Akibat Pandemi Covid-19.” Geram: Gerakan Aktif Menulis 8 (2): 73–85.

Mustika, Tria Putri, Agustina Agustina, and Syahrul Ramadhan. 2019. “Verbal Violence Performed by Supporters’ Group of Gubernatorial Candidates in the Political Discourse of Jakarta Election.” Humanus 18 (1): 88. https://doi.org/10.24036/humanus.v18i1.9081.

Novita, Nadya Afra, and Muhammad Adek. 2022. “Makian Dalam Bahasa Minangkabau Di Media Sosial Instagram.” Persona: Kajian Bahasa Dan Sastra 1 (1): 14–25.

Ragam Bahasa Indonesia dalam Komunikasi Politik. 2016. “Ragam Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Komunikasi Politik.” The POLITICS: Jurnal Magister Ilmu Politik Universitas Hasanuddin 2 (1): 121–31.

Rasheeda, Nareeman Jabbar. 2020. “A Pragmatic Analysis of the Speech Act of Request among Iraqi EFL Students.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 12 (12): 504–14.

Rismaya, Rima. 2020. “Pelanggaran Prinsip Kerja Sama Dan Kesantunan Berbahasa Dalam Cuitan Twitter Bertema Internalized Sexism ‘Internalisasi Seksisme’: Suatu Kajian Pragmatik.” Metahumaniora 10 (3): 346. https://doi.org/10.24198/metahumaniora.v10i3.31032.

Rustono. 1999. Pokok-Pokok Pragmatik. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press.

Sahara, Mas Ulin. 2020. “Prinsip Kerja Sama Grice Pada Percakapan Film.” BASINDO : Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia, Dan Pembelajarannya 4 (2): 222–31.

Saragi, Christina Natalina. 2019. “Wujud Tuturan Mengkritik Rocky Gerung terhadap Pemerintahan Presiden Joko Widodo.” Suar Betang 14 (2). https://doi.org/10.26499/surbet.v14i2.125.

Syahrul, R. 2008. Pragmatik Kesantunan Berbahasa (Menyimak Fenomena Berbahasa Indonesia Guru Dan Siswa). Padang: UNP Press.

Tarmini, Wini, and Imam Safii. 2018. “Kesantunan Berbahasa Civitas Academica Uhamka: Kajian Sosio-Pragmatik.” Jurnal IMAJERI 1 (1): 77–91.

Zamzani, Zamzani. 2013. “Pengembangan Alat Ukur Kesantunan Bahasa Indonesia Dalam Interaksi Sosial Bersemuka.” Litera 10 (1). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v10i1.1171.

Zhang, Meiling. 2014. “A Critical Discourse Analysis of Political News Reports.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies 4 (11). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.11.2273-2277.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/jbs.v11i3.127251

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra (2302-3538) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International  License

Publisher: Faculty of Languages and Arts, Universitas Negeri Padang