From Herland to Gilead:  Framing Post-Feminine Fertility  in Dystopian and Utopian Fiction

Joseph Padios Casibual

doi:10.24036/jbs.v10i2.116564

From Herland to Gilead: Framing Post-Feminine Fertility in Dystopian and Utopian Fiction

Joseph Padios Casibual

Abstract

There is something structurally amiss in a culture that only values women for their capacity to bear a child which is reflected in misrepresentations in literature that confined women to stereotypes that creates an endless room for debate as to what future is in store for women particularly in post-humanist literature. This paper addresses how female fertility is framed in the texts of Margaret Atwood- The Handmaid’s Tale and The Testaments (dystopian) and Charlotte Perkins Gilman- Herland and With Her in Ourland (utopian). Using transitivity analysis, it aims to examine representation and roles attached to feminine fertility, to discourse fertility in utopian and dystopian texts, and evaluate the politics of the female body in relation to fertility and reproduction. Clearly, Atwood’s dystopian fiction critically examined the oppressive and utilitarian view towards the female body which contrasted with Gilman’s utopic body autonomy. It is revealed that a sense of feminine liberty is associated with utopian fiction contrary to body bondage depicted in dystopian texts which have deeply elaborated a politicized view towards the future of the post-female body and women in general.

Keywords

dystopia, utopia, ecofeminism, fertility, transitivity analysis

Full Text:

PDF

References

Atwood, M., 1985. “The Handmaid’s Tale.” Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

---------------,2019.” The Testaments.” McClelland & Stewart.

Barr, M.S., 2000. “Lost in Space: Probing Feminist Science Fiction and Beyond.” Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P.

Chitando, A., 2011. “Narrating Gender and Danger in Selected Zimbabwe Women`s Writings on HIV and AIDS.” Feminist Studies, 27(1), pp. 125.

Claeys, G., 2010. ‘Preface’. In G. Claeys (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Utopian Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

De Beauvior, S., 1989. “The Second Sex”. New York: Vintage. Print.

Dijk, T.A., 1993. “Discourse, Power and Access”, in C.R. Caldas (ed.) Studies in Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge (in press).

Fitch, D., 2015. “From The Handmaid’s Tale to Bumped: Dystopian Fiction and American Women’s Reproductive Rights.” Undergraduate Thesis. Ohio State University.

Gaard, G., 1993. “Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature”. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

Gilbert, S., 2018. “The Remarkable Rise of the Feminist Dystopia.” The Atlantic. Retrieved from:

https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2018/10/feminist-speculative-fiction-2018/571822/

Gilman, C.P., 1915. “Herland”. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications. Reprint.

--------------- 1916. “With Her in Ourland”. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications. Reprint.

Halliday, MAK., 1978. “Language as a Social Semiotic”. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K., 1983. “The Language of Literature: A Stylistic Introduction to the Study of Literature”. Oxford: Pergamon Press

Haraway, D.J., 1985. “A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s.” Socialist Review, 80, pp, 65–107.

Kendal, E., 2018. “Utopian Literature and Bioethics: Exploring Reproductive Difference and Gender Equality.” Literature and Medicine 36(1), pp. 56–84. https://doi.org/10.1353/lm.2018.0002.

Jameson, F., 2000. “Utopia and Failure.” Politics and Culture, no. 2. : n.p. https:// politicsandculture.org/2010/08/10/utopia-and-failure-by-fredric-jameson-2/.

Lefanu, S., 1995. “Introduction to Joanna Russ, To Write Like a Woman: Essays in Feminism and Science Fiction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp 52-62.

Maher, J. M., 2008. “A Pregnant Man in the Movies: The Visual Politics of Reproduction.” Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 22 (2), pp. 279–88.

Pearson, W., 2010. “Queer Universes: Sexualities in Science Fiction. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

Ruppert, P. (1986). Reader in a Strange Land: The Activity of Reading Literary Utopias. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press, 1986. Print.

Shah, S., 2014. “Representation of Women in Mann O Salwa: A Case Study through Feminist Stylistic Analysis”. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences. University Faisalabad, Pakistan

Stein, K., 1992. "Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale: Scheherazade in Dystopia." University of Toronto Quarterly.

Steiger, E., 2010. “Not of Woman Born: How Ectogenesis Will Change the Way We View Viability, Birth, and the Status of the Unborn.” Journal of Law and Health 23, pp.143–71.

Vassalo, C., Greech, V. & Callus, I., 2017. “Infertility in Science Fiction as a Feminist Issue” SFRA Review, 3 (19), pp. 4-9

Williamson, D.B., 2017. “How is the body used to characterize the dystopian female identity in the patriarchal societies of Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale and Angela Carter’s The Passion of New Eve?”. INNERVATE 9, pp. 161-166.

Zarrinjooee, B., 2017. Women’s Oppressed and Disfigured Life in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8 (1), pp. 66-71.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/jbs.v10i2.116564