SCORING RUBRIC AS THE AUTHENTIC ASSESSMENT USING BY THE ENGLISH TEACHERS TO RUN THE NATIONAL CURRICULUM IN SOUTH SUMATERA, INDONESIA

Elsina Sihombing

Abstract


One main point on K-13 curriculum that makes it differs from others is its measurement standard, using authentic assessment. Authentic assessment recommends Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) as one of the methods of learning at schools. The result of her research is remaining that authentic assessment indicates the measurement of the learners learning with the competence based in doing something related to the themes they learned. The power of competence is not on the knowledge they have mastered but on the learners’ ability to present along the process, demonstrate, or doing something instead, as the result of the knowledge essence they have, meaningful and is needed around the environment. Language authentic assessment emphasizing on the language production ability more than theory only (linguistics competence) in daily communication to meet various needs of the students. Since most of the teachers especially in Lubuklinggau South Sumatera are still unfamiliar with authentic assessment, therefore, it is important to familiarize them. Since there are many teachers who do not understand, do not know what to score up from the students learning in authentic assessment, the researcher thinks that it is important to release such a vagueness and un-certainty because it is also one of the ways of how to save Indonesia Education heading toward the upgraded and the best education. To do that, the researcher presents a contribution bridging them and the Government, as well, by producing a guide-book of authentic assessment focusing on scoring rubric, as the product of the this research.

Keywords :  Scoring rubric, Authentic Assessment, National curriculum


Full Text:

PDF

References


Ansyar, Mohammad. 2014.Kurikulum( Hakikat, Fondasi, disain&Pengembangan). Jakarta. PenerbitKencanaPrenada media Group.

Bloxham& Boyd. 2007. Developing Effective Assessment in Higher Education. New York. Open Univ. Press.

Boundless.Maslow's Theory in Boundless Psychology.https://www.boundless.com/psychology/textbooks/boundless-psychology. retrieved by June 18th, 2016.

Burns, Robert. 1995. Research Method. Australia. Longman Australia Ptd, Ltd.

Field, Andi. 2005. Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London. Sage Publication.

Frankle&Wallen. 1993. How To Design and Evaluate Research. New York. McGraw-Hill Inc.

Gay, L.R. 1980.Educational Evaluation & Measurement.London. Charles E. MERRIL Publishing Company.

Gay &Airasian. 2000. Educational Research. Ohio. Prentice Hall, Inc.

Jackendoff, Ray. 2003. Foundation of Language. New York. Oxford University Press.

Johnson & Johnson. 2002. Meaningful Assessment. Sydney. Allyn& Bacon Company.

Joyce & Weil. 1992. Models of Teaching. London. Allyn and Bacon Publication.

Ken, Springer. 2010. Educational Research. New York. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Mori & Tanabe. 2015. Influence of Instructor Personality on Student Evaluation of Teaching. English Language Teaching; Vol. 8, No. 1. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n1p1. Retrieved by : December 17, 2014.

Naga, Dali S. 1992. TeoriSekor. Jakarta. Gunadarma Press.

Ormrod, Jeanne. 2009. PsikologiPendidikan. Jakarta. PT.GeloraAksaraPratama.

Ornstein &Hunkins. 2013. Curriculum. Boston. Allyn and Bacon Publication.

PeraturanPemerintah RI No. 17.DelapanStandarNasionalPendidikan.Jakarta. PT. Binatama Raya.

Popham, James. 1975. Educational Evaluation. New Jersey. Prantice-Hall Inc.

Reigeluth&Chellman. 2009. Instructional Design Theories and Models. New York. Routledge Group.

Reiser& Dempsey. 1997. Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. Ohio. Merill Prentice Hall.

Stufflebeam&Shinkfield. 2007. Evaluation Theory, Models, & Applications. United States. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Sugiyono. 2010. PenelitianPendidikan. Bandung. Alfabeta.

Willis, at al. 2000.Constructivist Instructional Design:

Creating a Multimedia Package for Teaching Critical Qualitative Research.http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR5-1/colon.html).

Yan, Jiaolan at al. 2015. Research and Practice on College English Oral Test. Beijing. English Language Teaching; Vol. 8, No. 3. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n3p121. Retrieved by : February 13, 2015.

Yasin, Anas. 2012. PenelitianKualitatif :Etnografi, Fenomenologi. Padang. Bung Hatta University Press.

Yusuf, Muri. 2013. MetodePenelitian. Padang. UNP Press.

Zais, Robert. 1996. Curriculum Principles and Foundation. New York. Crowell Company, Inc.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.