1. Home
  2. Vol 13, No 3 (2024)
  3. Pahril

An Analysis of Violation of Cooperative Principle Maxim in The Rush Hour Movie 1

Afiq Pahril(1), M. Zaim(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2024 Afiq Pahril, M. Zaim

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v13i3.130629

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


This study aims to find out the maxim that are classified as violating by the main characters in Rush Hour Movie 1 and to find out the maxim violation by the main characters influence to the characterization in the movie. This study uses a descriptive approach. Data and data sources are taken from the dialogues of the main characters which they are Lee and Carter  in the Rush Hour Movie 1 movie. Data collection was carried out by analyzing using Grice's theory (1975). The results of the data obtained from this study are that there are 4 maxims that are violated in Rush Hour Movie 1 with a total of 27 maxim violations. Of the 4 maxims, there are 14 violations of the maxim of quality, 2 violations of the maxim of quantity, 6 violations of the maxim of relevance, and 5 violations of the maxim of manner. This study provides valuable insight into how the cooperative principle does not occur properly due to the violation of maxims in their communication, then, the characterizations main characters that are violated from the four maxims are Liar, Braggart, Narcissitic, Overstate, Not Relevant, Unresponsive, Ambiguity, and Insolent.

Keywords


Maxim violation; Cooperative principle; Characterization; Rush Hour Movie 1

References


Ambalegin (2022). The Pragmatic Analysis Of Cooperative Principle In Turning Red Movie. Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature 10(2) 1487-1495 https://doi.org/10.24256/Ideas.V10i2.3179

Afiana (2020). The Cooperative Principle Analysis in About Time Movie. Linguistic English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 4(1), 66-76.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v4i1.1369

DiYanni, R. (2001). Literature Reading Fiction, Poetry, and Drama.

Grice, P. (1975). Syntax and Semantics Volume 3: Speech Acts. The Modern Language Journal, 60(ue 5/6), 301. https://doi.org/10.2307/324613

Grice, P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.

Moleong. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Rosdakarya.

Sudaryanto. (2014). Metode dan aneka teknik analisis bahasa (pengantar penelitian wahana kebudayaan secara linguistik. Sanata Dharma University Press.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta

Roekhan. (2002). Mengenali Kekerasan Simbolik Di Sekolah. Jurnal, Fakultas Sastra.

Roekhan. (2013). Mengenali Kekerasan Simbolik Di Sekolah. Jurnal, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Malang.

Rusminto, Nurlaksana Eko. (2015). Analisis Wacana: Sebuah Kajian Teoretis dan Praktis. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Ulhasanah, L. (2020). Pemaknaan Stereotip Gender dan Kelas Sosial pada Fiml “‘Little Woman.’”

Zaim, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Bahasa: Pendekatan Struktural. Sukabina Press.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 20 times
 PDF Downloaded : 13 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Afiq Pahril, M. Zaim

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.