Bahasa Tansi: The Language Loyalty of Its Speakers

Sabila Rahayu(1), Jufrizal Jufrizal(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2024 Sabila Rahayu

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v13i2.128783

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


The aim of this study was to determine the degree of language loyalty of bahasa Tansi speakers in Sawahlunto, West Sumatra, through a sociolinguistic analysis focusing on lexical differences, language loyalty, and language attitudes. This quantitative and descriptive qualitative research examined whether bahasa Tansi speakers are loyal in using the language or not. Data were collected using the 206 of Swadesh list words, questionnaires, interviews, and recorded conversations. The findings revealed that bahasa Tansi has 73.78% phonetic differences compared to Minangkabau, suggesting significant language divergence. Additionally, the study highlighted a strong sense of language loyalty and positive attitudes among speakers, indicating bahasa Tansi's robust sociolinguistic presence. Consequently, bahasa Tansi is classified as a creole with unique linguistic and cultural attributes, contributing to the linguistic diversity of West Sumatra.


Keywords


Bahasa Tansi, Language Attitude, Language Loyalty, Creole.

References


Chomsky, N. (2002). On Nature and Language. Cambridge University Press

Koyfman, S. (2017). What’s The Difference Between A Pidgin And A Creole?. Babbel Magazine. https://www.babbel.com/en/magazine/whats-the-difference-between-pidgin-and-creole

Mahsun. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bahasa:Tahapan, Strategi, Metode, dan Tekniknya (Ed. 3). Depok: Rajawali Pers.

Mouton, D. G. (2020). Pidginization and Creolization of Languages: Their Social Contexts. International Journal of The Sociology of Language https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-2088

Nordquist, R. (2020). What Is Mutual Intelligibility?. ThoughtCo. https://www.thoughtco.com/mutual-intelligibility-1691214

Owon, R. A. S., Eliya, I., & Hamid, A. (2022). Sosiolinguistik Suatu Pengenalan Awal. Forum Silaturahmi Doktor Indonesia.

Ozuorcun. F. (2014). Language Varieties: Pidgin and Creoles. EUL Journal of Social Sciences (V:II) LAU Sosyal Bilimer Dergisi.

Pambudi, F. R. I., & Jufrizal J. U. (2019). Tansi Language’ in Sawahlunto as a Result of Acculturation: A Dialect or A New Language In West Sumatra?. English Language and Literature, 3(1), Universitas Negeri Padang (UNP), 10.24036/ell.v8i3.105557.

Ramlan. (2018). Language Standardization In General Point Of View. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal) Volume I, February 2018, Page: 27-33

Ramoo, D. (2021). Psychology of Language. BC Campus.https://opentextbc.ca/psyclanguage/

Siahaan, A. (2008). Teaching English For Speech Using Cooperative Learning To The Second Semester Students. Jurnal Ilmiah ESTEEM, 1(1), 1. https://jurnal.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/index.php/esteem/article/view/10866/6398

Smackman, D. (2012). The definition of the standard language. A survey in seven countries. In: International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 218, 25-58.

Turale, S. (2020). A Brief Introduction to Qualitative Description: A Research Design Worth Using. Pacific Rim International Journal of Nursing Research Vol. 24 No. 3

Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Blackwell Publishing


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 28 times
 PDF Downloaded : 19 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Sabila Rahayu

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.