Analysis of Abbreviations Types and Purposes Found in Influencers' Twitter Accounts with Different Gender

Desi Budiati. S(1), Nur Rosita(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2024 Desi Budiati. S

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v13i1.127482

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


Abbreviation consists of five sorts, which are clipping, blends, acronym, initialism, and contraction. Emphasizing the enduring theme of gender differences in language use, the study contributes to the broader discourse on language and gender by examining how men and women employ abbreviations for distinct purposes. Drawing from the theoretical frameworks of Schendl for classifying abbreviation types and Tannen for understanding gender-specific purposes, the investigation centers on Twitter communication. The primary objective is to elucidate the differential use of abbreviations by men and women influencers and how these choices reflect their communicative objectives. The study uncovers significant disparities: women predominantly utilize clipping, initialism, and contractions, aligning with a focus on politeness, hedging, and interpersonal connections. In contrast, men show a preference for blends and acronyms, suggesting a communication style emphasizing efficiency and clarity. This research contributes to the understanding of how linguistic choices, specifically in abbreviations, serve as markers of gender-specific communication styles. The findings underscore the nuanced ways in which men and women employ abbreviations to achieve distinct communicative goals in the context of social media.


References


Crystal, D. (2008). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (The Language Library). John Wiley & Sons Incorporated.

Kridalaksana, H. (2009). Pembentukan Kata dalam Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia. 162-177.

Lakoff, R. T. (2004). Language and woman's place: Text and commentaries (Vol. 3). Oxford University Press, USA.

Litosseliti, L. (2010). Research Methods in Linguistics. New York: Continuum International l Punblishing Group.

Meinawati, E. (2017). social dimension of slang word in film “animal kingdom.” wanastra: jurnal bahasa dan sastra, 9(2), 156–16 https://doi.org/10.31294/w.v9i2.2583.

Mujiono & Herawati, S. (2020). Sociolinguistics: Application In Language Teaching. Malang: Media Nusa Creative.

Schendl, Hebert. (2001). Historical Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tannen, D. (2011). You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men. Conversation. New York: Ballantine books.

Wardhaugh, R. (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. New York : Basil Blackwell Inc.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 33 times
 PDF Downloaded : 10 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Desi Budiati. S

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.