Textual Metafunction Analysis in Surah Maryam and The Gospel of Luke: A Comparative Analysis

Anabel Dwiana Putri(1), Nur Rosita(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2023 Anabel Dwiana Putri

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v12i3.122841

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


This study aims to analyze and compare the Textual Metafunction in Surah Maryam and The Gospel of Luke. The texts were analyzed using Halliday and Matthiesen’s type of Themes theory and Danes’ thematic progression theory. There are three types of themes, namely topical, interpersonal, and textual themes. Also, there are three types of thematic progression, which are simple linear, constant continuous, and derived hyper-theme progression. While the data from this research is in the form of text. This study focused on comparing the theme types and thematic progression found in both texts. In analysis, both of the texts are mostly using an unmarked topical theme which aims to make the information conveyed in the text clear and easily understood by the reader. For the thematic progression, both of the texts also mainly use derived hyper-theme progression which focuses on a single Theme.

Keywords


Systemic Functional Linguistics; Textual Metafunction; Surah Maryam; The Gospel of Luke; Comparative Analysis

References


Danes, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. Papers on functional sentence perspective, 23, 106-128.

Darwis, D. (2010). English for Islamic Studies. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Fontaine, L. (2013). Analyzing English Grammar (A Systemic Functional Introduction). New York, Washington, United States of America: Cambridge University Press.

Gerot & Wignell, (1995). Making Sense of Functional Grammar: An Introductory Workbook. Cammeray: Antipodean Educational Enterprises.

Haleem, A. (2004). The Qur'an. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press Inc.

Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd ed.). Hodder Arnold.

Hasel Gerhard F. 2001. Old Testament.

Kasiram, Moh. (2008). Metodologi Penelitian. Malang: UIN-Malang

Pers.

Ragin, C (1984). ‘What is Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)?’

Thompson, G. (2013). Introducing Functional Grammar. Routledge.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 53 times
 PDF Downloaded : 29 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Anabel Dwiana Putri

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.