Language Style in Horror Movies

Yulia Silpitri(1), Hamzah Hamzah(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2023 Yulia Silpitri, Hamzah Hamzah

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v12i1.119634

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


The aim of this research is to compare the differences and similarities between The Conjuring 1 and The Conjuring 3 in the level of Field. This study was analyze using Halliday’s systemic functional linguistics theory. This study is a descriptive research. According to the study findings, both of Conjuring 1 and Conjuring 3 have four similarities and four differences in the level of Field. The findings lead to the conclusion that both of Conjuring 1 and Conjuring 3 are more similar than different and affects in how they produce utterances are influenced by word selection at the Field level, in context of situation.

 


Keywords


Language style, horror movies, context of situation level of Field, The Conjuring 1, The Conjuring 3

References


Akmajian, A., Demers, R. A., Farmer, A. K., & Harnish, R. M. (2001). An introduction to language and communication. In Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.

Bordwell, D. (2006). The way Hollywood tells it. University of California Press.

Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., & Spinks, S. (2012). Using functional grammar: An explorer’s guide. South Yarra. Victoria palgrave Macmillan.

Crystal, D. (1970). New perspectives for language study. 1: Stylistics. English Language Teaching, 24(2), 99-106.

Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to systemic functional linguistics. A&c Black.

Eggins, S., & Martin, J. R. (1997). Genres and registers of discourse. Discourse as structure and process, 1, 230-256.

Emilia, E., & Hamied, F. A. (2015). Systemic functional linguistic genre pedagogy (SFL GP) in a tertiary EFL writing context in Indonesia. TEFLIN journal, 26(2), 155-182.

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar: An introductory workbook. Queensland: Antipodean Educational Enterprises.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). Spoken and written modes of meaning. Media texts: Authors and readers, 7, 51-73.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective.

Halliday, M. A. K., Matthiessen, C. M., Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). An introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.

Leech, G. (2007). Style in fiction revisited: the beginning of Great Expectations. Style, 41(2), 117-132.

Martin, J. R., & White, P. R. (2003). The language of evaluation (Vol. 2). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Zheng, S., Yang, A., & Ge, G. (2014). Functional stylistic analysis: Transitivity in English-medium medical research articles. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(2), 12.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 146 times
 PDF Downloaded : 65 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Yulia Silpitri, Hamzah Hamzah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.