1. Home
  2. Vol 8, No 1 (2019)
  3. Rahmi

THE ANALYSIS OF IDEOLOGIES IN DONALD TRUMP’S POLITICAL SPEECHES ON NATIONAL SECURITY : A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS

Rize Rahmi(1), Hamzah Hamzah(2), Fitrawati Fitrawati(3),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(3) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2019 E-Journal English Language and Literature

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v8i1.103136

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract



Although there were many studies of Political Discourse had been done in CDA approach, but still few studies concern withrelation of ideology and language in the discourse. This study aims to, 1) find the ideological discourse structureswhich are used to enhance ideology in political speeches delivered by Donald Trump and 2) reveal the ideologies found in the speeches of Donald Trump about National Security. The analysis in this study is based on Fairclough’s(1992 )framework of Critical Discourse Analysis which consists of three levels of analysis; textual, discursive practice and socio-cultural practice. Then, for textual analysis, the writer used one analytical tool that is the theory of Ideological Discourse Structure of the discourse by Van Dijk (2000). The results showed that Donald Trump used language tactfully to achieve his goal on politics. The conclusion obtained is that Donald Trump enhances fascist ideology in his speeches which can be seen through the ideological structure of discourse which is found in his political speech on National Security.


Keywords


Critical discourse analysis, Ideologies, Donald Trump’s speeches, National Security.

References


Abdullah, N.M, &Darweesh, A.D. (2016).A Critical Discourse Analysis of Donald Trump's Sexist Ideology.Journal of Education and Practice.Vol.7, No.30, 2016

Ahmed, Shakeel. (2014). Critical Discourse Analysis of Prime Minister’s Speeches on Harmful Aerial Vehicles (Drones). International Journal of Language and Linguistics .Vol. 1, No. 2; December 2014

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1992). Language and Social Change. London: Polity Press.

Hamzah, &Ningsih, Kurnia .(2015). PraktekKekuasaan Dan Dominasi Guru Di DalamKelasDitinjau Dari StrukturWacanaPedagogikPembelajaranBahasaInggris.Lingua Didaktika:JurnalBahasadanPembelajaranBahasa 9 (1): 19-29.

Hussein .I. (2016).Critical Discourse Analysis of the Political Speech of the Egyptian President, Abdel Fattah El-Sisi, at the New Suez Canal Inauguration Ceremony.International Journal of Language and Literature.Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 85-106.

Indriani, Pinta & Fitrawati. (2018). An Analysis Of Linguistic Features In The Jakarta’s Governor Election Debate 2017. Journal of English Language and Literature. Volume 7 No 1. p 121-131. Retrieved from ejournal unphttp://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/ell/article/view/9905/7375

Mann, Michael. (2004). Fascists. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Renton, Dave. (1999). Fascism; Theory and Practice. London: Pluto Press.

Syarif, Hermawati. 2016. Linguistics and the English Language Instruction. Lingua Didaktika:JurnalBahasadanPembelajaranBahasa 10 (1): 50-59.

The New York Times. 2015. Obama directs administration to accept Syrian refugees.Retrieved fro


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 1777 times
 PDF Downloaded : 573 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 E-Journal English Language and Literature

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.