A CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF INDONESIA PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION IN 2014 GIVING SPEECHES IN CAMPAIGN DEBATE
), Jufri Syahrudin(2), (1) English Department, FBS, Universitas Negeri Padang
Indonesia
(2) English Department, FBS, Universitas Negeri Padang
Indonesia
Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2018 E-Journal English Language and Literature
DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/ell.v7i3.101188
Full Text:
Language : en
Abstract
This Paper is intended to show how one a single reality, that is International Politics and National Resilience, is presented and viewed by the two major of presidential candidates in 2014. In this paper, van Dijk’s (2004) framework adopted form Politics, ideology and discourse is used identify the discursive structures within the transcription of political campaign debate and to find out the ideology underlying them. The macro strategies of ‘positive self-representation’ and ‘negative other-representation’ (which are intimately tied up with ‘Polarization’ of in group vs. out group ideologies or US-THEM) and more strategies become very accurate criteria for the evaluation of attitudes, and opinions. The findings of this study can conducive to expanding readers’ critical thinking abilities in comprehension and production of language.
Keywords
References
Bullock, A. and Trombley, S. (1999) The new Fontana dictionary of modern thought. London: HarperCollins.
Denzin, Norman K and Yvonna S. Lincoln. 2011. The SAGE publication of Qualitative Research. SAGE publication, inc. USA.
Dellinger, B. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis, Available athttp://users.utu.fi/bredelli/cda.html (Accessed: 5 September 2017).
Edelman, M. J. (1977) Political language : words that succeed and policies that fail. New York: Academic Press.
Edwards, J. (2006) 'Language Attitudes', in Brown, K.(ed), The Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Vol. 6 Oxford ; New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 324-331.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and social change, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997): Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, in Teun. A. van Dijk (Ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage Publications.
Fairclough, N. (20/12/2006) Tony Blair and the language of politics. Available at:http://www.opendemocracy.net/democracy-blair/blair_language_4205.jsp (Accessed: 5 September).
Fairclough, Isabela and Fairclough, Norman. 2012. Political Discourse Analysis. Routledge. London.
Jones, J. and Peccei, J. S. (2004) 'Language and politics', in Thomas, L.(ed), Language, society, and power.New York: Routledge.
Locke, Terry. 2004. Critical Discourse Analysis. London.
Meyerhoff, M. and Ebooks Corporation. (2006) Introducing sociolinguistics. Abingdon:Routledge.
PENNYCOOK, A. 1994. Incommensurable Discourses in Applied Lingistics, Vol. 15, No.2, pp. 115-138. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schaffner, C. (1996) „Editorial: political speeches and discourse
analysis‟, Current Issues in Language&Society, 3, (3), pp.201-204.
Simons, Herbert W. 1976. Persuasion: Understanding, Practice, and Analysis. New York: Newbery Award Records, Inc.
Titscher, S.; Meyer, M.; Wodak, R.; & Vetter, E. (2000) Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: Sage.
VanDijk, A.T. (1997). Discourse as structure and process of discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. Volume I. SAGE Publications, London.
van Dijk, T.A. (2001). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, & H.
Hamilton (Eds.): Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell.
van Dijk, T. A. (2003) 'Critical discourse analysis', in Schiffrin, D.,
Tannen, D., Hamilton, H.E. (ed), The handbook of discourse analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 352-371.
van Dijk, T.A. (2004). Politics, ideology and discourse. Retrieved September5, 2017 from http://www.discourse-in-society.org/teun.html.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006) 'Politics, ideology, and discourse', in Brown, K.(ed), The Encyclopedia of language and linguistics. Vol. 9 Oxford ; New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 728-740.
Wareing, S. (2004) 'What is language and what does it do?', in Thomas, L.(ed),Language, society, and power. New York: Routledge.
Yarmohammadi, L. (2000). Discourse and the Translator (1), Iranian Journal of Translation, 9 (32), 3-10.
Article Metrics
Abstract Views : 1591 times
PDF Downloaded : 795 times
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018 E-Journal English Language and Literature
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
