Peran Dukungan Otonomi Guru terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa

Mario Pratama

doi:10.24036/rapun.v10i2.106675

Peran Dukungan Otonomi Guru terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa

Mario Pratama⁽¹⁾,
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang

Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2019 Mario Pratama

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/rapun.v10i2.106675

Full Text:

Language : ind

Abstract

Penelitian ini didasari atas prestasi belajar matematika siswa di Indonesia yang masih belum memuaskan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah prestasi belajar matematika siswa dapat diprediksi melalui dukungan otonomi guru pada siswa. Subjek dalam penelitian ini berjumlah 183 siswa SMP. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan skala dukungan otonomi guru dan nilai ujian semester pelajaran matematika siswa. Analisis data dilakukan dengan menggunakan analisis regresi linear sederhana. Hasil dari penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa dukungan otonomi guru berhubungan dengan prestasi belajar matematika dengan korelasi sebesar 0,241 (p=0,002, p<0,01). Dukungan otonomi guru memberikan sumbangan efektif sebesar 5,1% terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa.Prestasi belajar matematika, dukungan otonomi guru

Keywords

Prestasi belajar matematika, dukungan otonomi guru

References

Azwar, S. (1998). Metode penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Boaler, J., Williams, C., & Confer, A. (2015). Fluency without fear: Research evidence on the best ways to learn math facts. Youcubed at Stanford University, 1–28.

BSNP (Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan). (2006). Standar Isi, standar kompetensi dan kompetensi dasar SMP/MTS. Jakarta: Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Bonneville-Roussy, A., Vallerand, R. J., & Bouffard, T. (2013). The roles of autonomy support and harmonious and obsessive passions in educational persistence. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 22-31.

Danielsen, A. G., Wiium, N., Wilhelmsen, B. U., & Wold, B. (2010). Perceived support provided by teachers and classmates and student's self-reported academic initiative. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 247–267.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

Field, A. (2005). Discovery statistics using SPSS for windows. London: Sage Publication.

Froiland, J. M., Davison, M. L., & Worrell, F. C. (2016). Aloha teachers: Teacher autonomy support promotes Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander students’ motivation, school belonging, course-taking and math achievement. Social Psychology of Education, 19(4), 879-894.

Froiland, J., Oros, E., Smith, L., & Hirchert, T. (2012). Intrinsic motivation to learn: The nexus between psychological health and academic success. Contemporary School Psychology, 16, 91–101. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03340978.

Grolnick, W. S., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Inner resources for school achievement: Motivational mediators of children’s perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 508–517.

Joussemet, M., Landry, R., & Koestner, R. (2008). A self-determination theory perspective on parenting. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 194–200. doi:10.1037/a0012754

Joussemet, M., Koestner, R., Lekes, N., & Landry, R. (2005). A longitudinal study of the relationship of maternal autonomy support to children’s adjustment and achievement in school. Journal of Personality, 73(5). doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00347.x.

Mageau, G. A & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). The coach–athlete relationship: A motivational model. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21, 883–904. http://doi.org/10.1080/0264041031000140374.

McLachlan, S., & Hagger, M. S. (2010). Effects of an autonomy-supportive intervention on tutor behaviors in a higher education context. Teaching and Teacher Education 26, 1204-1210.

Murayama, K., Pekrun, R., Lichtenfeld, S., & Vom Hofe, R. (2013). Predicting long-term growth in students’ mathematics achievement: The unique contributions of motivation and cognitive strategies. Child Development, 84(0), 1475–1490. http://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12036.

Napitupulu, E. L. (2012, Desember). Prestasi Sains dan Matematika Indonesia Menurun. Kompas. Diakses dari http://edukasi.kompas.com/, tanggal 19 November 2014.

National Research Council (1989). Everybody counts. A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Nurjanah, U. (2010). Hubungan iklim kelas dan efikasi diri dengan prestasi belajar matematika pasa siswa kelas lima madrasah ibtidaiyah. (Tesis tidak diterbitkan) Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta.

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2014). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Diakses dari http://www.oecd.org/pisa.

Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Bri, N. M. (2002). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study 1. Motivation and Emotion, 25(4), 279–306.

Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. The Elementary School Journal, 106(3), 225–236. doi:10.1086/501484.

Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What Teachers Say and Do to Support Students’ Autonomy During a Learning Activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209–218. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.209.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557–1585. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x

Sakiz, G., Pape, S. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2012). Does perceived teacher affective support matter for middle school students in mathematics classrooms?. Journal of School Psychology 50, 235–255.

Soenens, B., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2005). Antecedents and outcomes of self-determination in 3 life domains: The role of parent's and teacher's autonomy support. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34(6), 589–604. doi:10.1007/s10964-005-8948-y.

Sundstrom T. (2014). Mathematical reasoning: Writing and proof. Allendale: Pearson Education.

Suryabrata, S. (2002). Psikologi pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Tubbs, J. E., & Garner, M. (2008). The impact of school climate on school outcomes. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 5(9), 17–26.

Um, K. E., Corter, J., & Tatsuka, K. (2005). Motivation, autonomy support, and mathematics performance: A Structural Equation Analysis (NSF report no. 0126064). Diakses dari Columbia University, National Science Foundation Website: http://www.cms.tc.columbia.edu/i/a/1996_NCME2005-eunkyoung.pdf

Varol F., & Farran, D.C. (2006). Early mathematical growth: How to support young children’s mathematical development. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(2), 89-94.

Wong, M. M. (2008). Perceptions of parental involvement and autonomy support: their relations with self-regulation , academic performance , substance use and resilience among adolescents. North American Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 497–518.

Yenilmez K., Nuray, G., & Ozlem, U. (2008). Mathematics learning styles of students of the fakulty of economics and business administration in Turkey. E-Journal of New World science academy, 3(2), 345-362.