ANALISIS KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MATEMATIS PESERTA DIDIK KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI 1 PADANG DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF

FIKRIYATUL Khairat - Universitas Negeri Padang

Abstract


This research aims to describe the student’s mathematical critical thinking ability trough the field dependent (FD) or field independent (FI) kognitive styles. This research used mixed research to describe the relation between two variabels with statistics approach and descriptive qualitative approach. Data was taken from 168 students of SMP Negeri 1 Padang and choose 6 of them to be interviewed. The result of data analysis showed that there is a significant correlation between kognitive styles and student’s mathematical critical thinking ability. The student with FD cognitive styles showed a higher ability than student with FI cognitive style in identify the asumptions needed to solve mathematical problem. Both of kognitive styles show the equal ability in indentify data that is relevant to the mathematics problem given. Otherwise, the student with FI cognitive styles showed a higher ability than student with FD cognitive style in examining the truth of the statement, compiling questions, and solving mathematical problems.

Keywords—critical thinking, mathematical critical thinking ability, cognitive styles, field dependent, field independent


Full Text:

PDF

References


Kemendikbud, 2018. Buku Pegangan Pembelajaran Berorientasi pada Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi: Program Peningkatan Kompetensi Pembelajaran Berbasis Zonasi. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Aksu, Gökhan & Koruklu, Nermin. 2015. Determination the Effects of Vocational High School Students’ Logical and Critical Thinking Skills on Mathematics Success. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. (Issue 59). Hlm. 181-206.

Facione, Peter A. 2015. Critical Thinking: What It is and Why it Counts. Measured Reasons LLC, Hermosa Beach, CA.

Sumarmo, Utari. 2016. Pedoman Pemberian Skor pada Beragam Tes Kemampuan Matematik. Bahan Ajar Mata Kuliah Evaluasi Pembelajaran Matematika pada Program Magister Pendidikan Matematika. Bandung: STKIP Siliwangi.

Kemendikbud. 2016. Empat Perbaikan Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Media Komunikasi dan Inspirasi Jendela Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Edisi III. Hlm. 6-21.

Febriyanti, Chatarina. 2015. Pengaruh Bentuk Umpan Balik dan Gaya Kognitif terhadap Hasil Belajar Trigonometri. Jurnal Formatif (Vol. 3 No. 3). hlm. 203—214.

Davis, Gregory A. 2006. Learning Style and Personality Type Preferences of Community Development Extension Educators. Journal of Agricultural Education (Vol. 47 No 1). Hlm. 90—99.

Brown, H. Doughas. 2000. Principal of Language Learning and Teaching, Fourth Edition. New York: Addoson Wesley Longman, Inc.

Hsin-Ke, Lu dan Peng-Chun, Lin. 2018. A Study on the Effect of Cognitive Style in the Field of STEM on Collaborative Learning Outcome. International Journal of Information and education Technology (vol 8 no 3).

Rifqiyana, Lilyan.2015. “Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta didik dengan Pembelajaran Model 4K Materi Kelas VIII ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Peserta didik.” Skripsi. Universitas Negeri Semarang.

Agoestanto, A., YL Sukestiyarno, & Rochmad. 2017. “Analysis of Mathematics Critical Thinking Students in Junior High School Based on Cognitive Style”. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 824.

Ramlah. 2014. “Relationship between Students’ Cognitive Style (Field Dependent and Field–Independent Cognitive Styles) with their Mathematic Achievement in Primary School”. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE) (Vol 1, Issue 10). Hlm. 88—93.

Miles, Mattew B dan Huberman, A. Michael. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif : Buku Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Jakarta: UI Press.

Sugiyono. 2015. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan : Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung : Alfabeta




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/pmat.v8i2.6219