Stress Test of BPRS and BUS Capital for the 2014-2022 Period Using the ECL Approach

Isma Nisa' - Univesitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang
Ulfi Oktaviana - Univesitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang

Abstract


The operation of BUS and BPRS cannot be separated from the risks experienced, one of which is capital risk. The capital stress test used to calculate the capital adequacy of BUS and BPRS is the calculation of Expected Credit Loss (expected loan loss). ECL is the result of multiplying PD, LGD, and EAD. This study aims to determine the assessment and differences in capital stress tests using the ECL approach in BUS and BPRS. This research uses a descriptive quantitative approach. The method used is purposive sampling. The samples of this study were 12 BUS and 3 BPRS. The data used is secondary data in the form of annual financial reports taken from the official websites of BUS and BPRS for 2014-2022. The results of this study indicate that the assessment of the capital stress test using the ECL approach on BUS is classified as stage 1 (performing), and BPRS is classified as stage 2 (under-performing). A significant difference was found between BUS and BPRS.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agustian, V., & Syofyan, R. (2022). Analisis Potensi Kebangkrutan Perusahaan Sub Sektor Transportasi yang Terdaftar di BEI Sebelum dan Selama Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Ecogen, 5(3), 487. https://doi.org/10.24036/jmpe.v5i3.13725

Arikunto, S. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik (Edisi Revisi VI).

Auraluna, S., Isma, T., Sixpria, N., Akuntansi, J., & Jakarta, P. N. (2022). Analisis Dampak Penerapan PSAK 71 terhadap Pembentukan Cadangan Kerugian Penurunan Nilai dan Kinerja Keuangan pada Entitas Perbankan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia.

Febiyanni, & Hermanto. (2023). The influence of capital, liquidity, and credit risk on probability with macroprudential intermediation ratio as a moderating variable. In Enrichment: Journal of Management, 13(3).

Hartanto, A. D., & Setijaningsih, H. T. (2023). Determinan Probability of Default dalam Perhitungan Expected Credit Loss Perbankan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(1), 157–176.

Indramawan, D. (2019). Implementasi PSAK 71 pada Perbankan. www.theedgemarkets.com/article/cover-story-banks-brace-mfrs9-impact

Indroes, F. N. (2017). Manajemen Risiko Perbankan.

Kindi Ridwan Roni, A., & Oktavia, R. (2023). Pengaruh Metode Ecl Dalam Pembentukan Ckpn Dan Car Terhadap Npl Sesuai Dengan Psak 71. In Jurnal Riset Akuntansi (JURA) (Vol. 1, Issue 1).

Mongid, A., & Kurniadi, D. (2018). A Simple Stress Test on Indonesian Islamic Banking Industry. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.26905/jkdp.v22i1.571

PJOK. (2022). POJK 26 Tahun 2022. Bank Pembiyaaan Rakyat Syariah.

Prabowo, H. Y. S. H. (2016). Istilah-Istilah Bank dan Lembaga Keuangan Syariah (H. Y. Prabowo & H. Sudarsono, Eds.). UIIPress.

Pratiwi, A., Puspita, B. N. D., & Wahyudi, S. (2019). Pengujian Potensi Kebangkrutan Grup Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah di Indonesia. Jurnal Economia, 15, 114–134.

Rosida, I. N., & Yazid, M. (2022). EFISIENSI PEMBIAYAAN AGRIBISNIS BANK SYARIAH DI INDONESIA PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19. EL DINAR: Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan Syariah, 10(2).

Setiawan, W. W., Nissa, A., Febriana, R., Tistita, R., Indah, D. P., & Yunita, K. (2022). Implementasi PSAK 71 Pada Bank Pembangunan Daerah Kalimantan Barat. 200–208. https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/prosidingKAK/index

Sufitri. (2019). Early Warning System (AWS) Analysis With The Logit Model For Predicting the Consumer Loan Banks (BPRS). Jurnal Akuntansi, Ekonomi Dan Manajemen Bisnis, 7(1), 30–37.

Sugiarto, S., & Suroso, S. (2020). Innovation of impairment loss allowance model of Indonesian financial accounting standards 71. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 27(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABES-11-2019-0114

Suroso. (2017). Penerapan PSAK 71 dan Dampaknya Terhadap Kewajiban Penyediaan Modal Minimum Bank. Jurnal Bina Akuntansi, 157–165.

Utami, P., & Tasman Abel. (2020). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Efisiensi Operasional, Kualitas Aset, dan Likuiditas Terhadap Tingkat Kecukupan Modal Pada Sektor Perbankan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal EcoGen, 3(3), 385–399.

Wenni, A. N., & Canggih, C. (2021). Faktor-faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Perkembangan Produk Pembiayaan Pada Bank Pembiayaan Rakyat Syariah di Jawa Timur. Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan Dan Perbankan Syariah, 5, 15–33.

Wilara, G. R., & Prawoto, N. (2016). Determinan Ketahanan Modal Bank Syariah di Indonesia: Pendekatan ECM. Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.18196/jesp.17.2.3957

Yildrim, I. (2012). Stress Testing in Risk Management : An Application in the Turkish Banking Sector. Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 3(6), 441–444. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJTEF.2012.V3.242




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/jmpe.v7i2.15823