Kilovolt Variation and Digital Image Contrast: Phantom Study Comparison

Sagita Yudha - Universitas Baiturrahmah, Jl. Raya ByPass Km 15 Aie Pacah, 27171
Nerifa Dewilza - Universitas Baiturrahmah, Jl. Raya ByPass Km 15 Aie Pacah, 27171
Oktavia Sari - Universitas Baiturrahmah, Jl. Raya ByPass Km 15 Aie Pacah, 27171
Chairun Nisa - Universitas Baiturrahmah, Jl. Raya ByPass Km 15 Aie Pacah, 27171
- Vania - Universitas Baiturrahmah, Jl. Raya ByPass Km 15 Aie Pacah, 27171

Abstract


An exposure factor that is too high can result in radiography results that are too black (dark), and an exposure factor that is too low can result in results that are white (bright). Providing an inappropriate exposure factor can prevent the radiograph from providing the best information. When the exposure factor is set properly, radiographic contrast can be maximized, allowing different organs with varying densities to be clearly distinguished from one another in terms of blackness. This kind of research combines an experimental study with quantitative methods. The experimental approach can be understood as a research technique to compare treatments with one another in a controlled environment in order to compare kV fluctuations in the pelvic phantom and achieve the best possible picture quality (contrast). The data processed in the Image J application in the form of a histogram graph is strengthened by data processing using SPSS and the Friedman test. Based on the results of the analysis of the Friedman test, there is an influence, the results obtained at kV 70 show the highest mean rank of 4.57 and in the image J application it shows at kV 70 with graphic results on the histogram of contrast levels which are good, then the radiographic results of the comparison of variations in kV versus contrast in the optimal pelvic phantom are obtained, namely at kV 70.

References


S. F. Moey et al., “Effects of Kilovoltage on Image Quality and Entrance Surface Dose in Lumbar Spine Digital Radiography Iranian Journal of Medical Physics Effects of Kilovoltage on Image Quality and Entrance Surface Dose in Lumbar Spine Digital Radiography,” Article in Iranian Journal of Medical Physics, no. September, 2019, doi: 10.22038/ijmp.2018.34167.1431.

C. Kuwahara et al., “Optimal beam quality for chest flat panel detector system: realistic phantom study,” Eur Radiol, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 4538–4543, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-5998-1.

I. S. Sayed et al., “ASCERTAINING THE INFLUENCE OF GRID VS . NON-GRID TECHNIQUES ON RADIATION DOSE TO THE SKULL , EYES , AND THYROIDS AND IMAGE QUALITY IN ANTEROPOSTERIOR ( AP ) SKULL X-RAY EXAMINATIONS : A PHANTOM STUDY,” vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 120–132, 2023.

S. Takagi, T. Yaegashi, and M. Ishikawa, “Relationship Between Tube Voltage and Physical Image Quality of Pulmonary Nodules on Chest Radiographs Obtained Using the Bone-Suppression Technique,” Acad Radiol, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. e174–e179, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.08.017.

P. R. Castilho, H. Schelin, V. Denyak, R. Mello, A. Legnani, and S. Paschuk, “Assessment of image quality in digital radiology using the CDRAD contrast-detail phantom in pediatrics,” vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 11–16, 2023.

Nomor and Sriwahyuni, “PENGARUH TEGANGAN TABUNG (KV) TERHADAP KUALITAS CITRA RADIOGRAFI PESAWAT SINAR-X DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY (DR) PADA PHANTOM ABDOMEN,” 2017, doi: 10.21009/SPEKTRA.

F. Piantini et al., “Dose evaluation in paediatric patients undergoing chest X-ray examinations,” Radiation Physics and Chemistry, vol. 140, no. January, pp. 283–289, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2017.01.026.

Sugiyono, Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif & Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.

S. Zelviani and dan Sahara Jurusan Fisika, “PENGARUH TEGANGAN TABUNG (kV) PADA PEMERIKSAAN THORAX TERHADAP KUALITAS CITRA RADIOGRAFI DENGAN ANALISIS APLIKASI IMAGE-J,” Jurnal Fisika dan Terapannya, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 139–148, 2020, doi: 10.24252/jft.v7i2.18267.

S. Al-Murshedi, P. Hogg, and A. England, “An investigation into the validity of utilising the CDraD 2.0 phantom for optimisation studies in digital radiography,” British Journal of Radiology, vol. 91, no. 1089, 2018, doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180317.

E. Sparzinanda, “Pengaruh Faktor Eksposi Terhadap Kualitas Citra Radiografi,” Journal Online of Physics 3, vol. 1, pp. 14–22, 2017.

M. Geso, S. S. Alghamdi, M. Shanahan, S. Alghamdi, R. Mineo, and B. Aldhafery, “Information Loss Via Visual Assessment of Radiologic Images Using Modified Version of the Low-Contrast Detailed Phantom at Direct DR System,” J Med Imaging Radiat Sci, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 137–143, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2017.02.069.

N. Gharehaghaji, D. Khezerloo, and T. Abbasiazar, “Image quality assessment of the digital radiography units in Tabriz, Iran: A phantom study,” J Med Signals Sens, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 137–142, 2019, doi: 10.4103/jmss.JMSS_30_18.

Euclid. Seeram, Digital Radiography: Physical Principles and Quality Control. Springer US, 2019.

A. N. Prayoga, N. Suraningsih, and M. I. Puspita, “the Effect of Exposure Factors on Radiographic Image Quality on Thorax Phantom With Pa Projection,” Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Kesehatan, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 22–26, 2022, doi: 10.33666/jitk.v13i1.425.

Fitriani, S. Zelviani, and Sahara, “Pengaruh Tegangan Tabung (kV) Pada Pemeriksaan Thorax Terhadap Kualitas Citra Radiografi Di BBKPMM,” Concept and Communication, vol. null, no. 23, pp. 301–316, 2019.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24036/17211171074