Pengembangan modul bentuk molekul berbasis inkuiri terstruktur dengan penekanan pada level submikroskopik menggunakan pemodelan untuk kelas X SMA
Abstract
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Brady James E. (2012). Chemistry The Molecular Nature of Matter. New York: John Wiley & Sons; Inc.
Rusman. 2011. Model-Model Pembelajaran, Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Press
Nasution. 2015. Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar dan Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Bell, R. (2005). Simplifying Inquiry Instruction. The Science Teacher, 31–33.
Zion, M., & Mendelovic, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383–399.
Cavallo, A. M. L., Potter, W. H., & Rozman, M. (2004). Gender Differences in Learning Constructs, Shifts in Learning Constructs, and Their Relationship to Course Achievement in a Structured Inquiry, Yearlong College Physics Course for Life Science Majors. School Science and Mathematics, 104(6), 288–300.
Sugiarto. (2015). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Materi Getaran Dan Gelombang Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Inkuiri Terstruktur. Jurnal Penelitian Tindakan Kelas, 16(4), 51–56.
Sagita, R., Azra, F., & Azhar, M. (2018). Development of Mole Concept Module Based on Structured Inquiry with Interconection of Macro, Submicro, and Symbolic Representation for Grade X of Senior High School. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335(1).
Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet.” International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179–195.
Li, W. S. S., & Arshad, M. Y. (2014). Application of multiple representation levels in redox reactions among tenth grade chemistry teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 11(3), 35–52.
Sunyono, Yuanita, L., & Ibrahim, M. (2013). Efektivitas model pembelajaran berbasis multipel representasi dalam membangun model mental mahasiswa topik stoikiometri reaksi. Pendidikan Progresif, 3(1), 65–79.
Pfennig, B. W., & Frock, R. L. (1999). The Use of Molecular Modeling and VSEPR Theory in the Undergraduate Curriculum to Predict the Three-Dimensional Structure of Molecules. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(7), 1018.
Donaghy, K. J. (2012). Connecting Geometry and Chemistry: A Three-Step Approach to Three-Dimensional Thinking - Journal of Chemical Education (ACS Publications and Division of Chemical Education). Journal of Chemical Education, 2–5. Retrieved from
Dean, N. L., Ewan, C., & McIndoe, J. S. (2016). Applying Hand-Held 3D Printing Technology to the Teaching of VSEPR Theory. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(9), 1660–1662.
Chang, Raymond. (2008). General Chemistry the Essential Concepts. McGraw-Hill.
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Boslaugh, S., & Watters, P. A. (2008). Statistics in a nutshell (OReilly). Book.
Depdiknas. 2008. Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas.
Dean, N. L., Ewan, C., & McIndoe, J. S. (2016). Applying Hand-Held 3D Printing Technology to the Teaching of VSEPR Theory. Journal of Chemical Education, 93(9), 1660–1662.
Nasution. 2015. Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar dan Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Trianto. 2009. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Chittleborough, G. and Treagust, D. F. (2007) ‘The modelling ability of non-major chemistry students and their understanding of the sub-microscopic level’, 8(3), pp. 274–292.
Permendikbud. 2018. Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Nomor 24 Tahun 2016 Tentang Kompetensi Inti Dn Kompetensi Dasar Pelajaran Pada Kurikulum 2013 Pada Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pendidikan Menengah. Jakarta: Menteri Pendidika Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia.
Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Chittleborough, G. and Treagust, D. F. (2007) ‘The modelling ability of non-major chemistry students and their understanding of the sub-microscopic level’, 8(3), pp. 274–292.
Arifin, Zaenal. (2011). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Zion, M., & Mendelovic, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383–399.
Wiyani, Novan Ardy. (2013). Desain Pembelajaran Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Nasution. 2015. Berbagai Pendekatan dalam Proses Belajar dan Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/ekj.v1i1.104088
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
EduKimia
Official Journal from Chemistry Education Study Programme
Chemistry Department
Faculty of Mathematics and Science
Universitas Negeri Padang
_______________________________________________________________
Jurnal Resmi Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia
Jurusan Kimia
Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam
Universitas Negeri Padang
_______________________________________________________________
Jl. Prof. Dr. Hamka, Air Tawar Barat, Padang Utara, Padang, Sumatera Barat, Indonesia. 25171
_________________________________________________________
ISSN (Online): 2502-6399
Comments on this article
by Detiktoto Slot (2023-12-27)