An Analysis of the Teaching Ability of English Education Student at Teaching Practice Program (PLK) at West Sumatra Province
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c47a/6c47ae4a4dce72e256ead5d88af9e61a18b993b6" alt=""
(1) Universitas negeri padang 
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79d7f/79d7f08c28453650a652a2e672ca8616c8c95cc2" alt=""
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang 
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79d7f/79d7f08c28453650a652a2e672ca8616c8c95cc2" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c47a/6c47ae4a4dce72e256ead5d88af9e61a18b993b6" alt=""
Copyright (c) 2025 Rahmi Denura
DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v14i1.132998
Abstract
This study assesses the teaching ability of
student teachers in classroom practice. The research
involved 20 student teachers from the English
Education Study Program at Universitas Negeri
Padang, who conducted their teaching practice in
senior high schools across West Sumatra. Using a
descriptive quantitative approach, data were
collected through a teaching practice test adapted
from the PPG teaching practice guide. The test
included two main aspects: the ability to apply
lesson plans (10 items) and overall teaching ability
(19 items). The assessment was conducted by two
raters: Rater 1 (mentor) and Rater 2 (researcher).
The results showed that for student teachers’ ability
to apply a lesson plan, Rater 1 assigned an average
score of 7.70, while Rater 2 gave 7.80, leading to an
overall score of 7.75 which is categorized as the
“good” category. For teaching ability, Rater 1
scored 7.80, and Rater 2 scored 8.00, with a
combined average of 7.90 which is categorized as
“good”. The overall average score for both
indicators was 7.85, and also have a “good”
category. This result indicates that student teachers
get a good ability to apply a lesson plan and teaching
ability in the classroom from both raters. .
Keywords
References
Lander, J. A., & Brown, H. D. (1995). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive
Approach to Language Pedagogy. In Language (Vol. 71, Issue 4, p. 843).
https://doi.org/10.2307/415773
Hazmi. (2019). Teacher-student interaction in English classroom setting. 53-63.
Hartina, H. (2021). An Analysis of English Teachers’ Lesson Plan Based on
Curriculum 2013 at SMPN 1 Bangkinang Kota.
Tabroni, I., Maryani, A. H., & Sari, R. P. (2022). Teacher Performance Improvement
In Building Quality Education. Al-Abshar: Journal of Islamic Education
Management, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.58223/al-abshar.v1i1.6
Wang, Z., Qian, K., Zhu, X., & Hu, X. (2023). Influences of Online Teaching Ability
of University Teachers on Learning Engagement of Learners. International
Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(5), 203–216.
https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i05.37809
Brown, H. D. (1980). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Prentice Hall.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). "Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A
Review of State Policy Evidence." Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1),
-44.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating
to Achievement. Routledge.
Rosenshine, B. (2012). "Principles of Instruction: Research-Based Strategies That
All Teachers Should Know." American Educator, 36(1), 12-19.
Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching (4th ed.). Pearson
Longman.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the
student does (4th ed.). Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.
Article Metrics
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ac5d/4ac5d9ac3e016b587b461d02496a9a1b212d8eab" alt=""
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Rahmi Denura
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5c1a/f5c1a720365891b065065d0b560c5911a5ec68a4" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.