Morphological Response of Several Rice Varieties to Drought Stress Simulation using PEG

Rezi Nabilah, Afifatul Achyar, Zulyusri Zulyusri, Yusni Atifah, Dwi Hilda Putri, Violita Violita

Abstract


Rice has become food for most of the world's population. Indonesia is the third largest producer in the world. However, in fact rice production in Indonesia has decreased by 0.43% compared to 2020. One of the factors that can cause this decline is drought. Because rice is a semi-aquatic plant that grows normally in flooded conditions, it makes drought stress very threatening. Drought stress that occurs in plants causes plants to experience oxidative stress due to excessive accumulation of ROS. PEG is a compound that is widely used to provide drought conditions in plants. Previous research has classified several varieties of rice plants based on their level of resistance to drought. However, it is not yet known how the morphological response will be in different periods of drought stress and rewatering treatment. This research was conducted by giving treatment in the form of control (Yoshida nutrient culture solution) and drought stress (Yoshida + PEG-6000 20% solution) repeated 3 times. The observed parameters were RWC which were analyzed using standard errors and morphological images of roots and leaves. The results showed that the RWC obtained during the stress period from the third to the fifth day, Harum had the highest value according to its class as tolerant rice. After rewatering Rosna has a better recovery ability. In addition, root morphology shows differences in the form of root length, small root diameter, inhibition of adventive root growth. On the leaves include a decrease in leaf area, leaf curl up, and leaf yellowing.


Keywords


Oryza sativa, Drought stress, PEG, Morphology response, Rice

References


Ahmad, M. A., Javed, R., Adeel, M., Rizwan, M., & Yang, Y. (2020). PEG 6000-Stimulated Drought Stress Improves the Attributes of In Vitro Growth, Steviol Glycosides Production, and Antioxidant Activities in Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Plants, 9(11).

Anosheh, H. P., Moucheshi, S. A., Pakniyat, H., & Pessarakli, M. (2016). Stomatal responses to drought stress. Water Stress and Crop Plants: A Sustainable Approach, 1, 24–40.

Azhari, S., & Violita. (2019). Identification Of Drought Tolerance of West Sumatera Local Rice (Oryza Sativa L.) at Germination Stage Using PEG 8000. Serambi Biologi, 4(1), 21–28.

Basal, O., Szabó, A., & Veres, S. (2020). Physiology of soybean as affected by PEG-induced drought stress. Current Plant Biology, 22.

BPS. (2022). Luas Panen Dan Produksi Padi di Indonesia 2021. In Badan Pusat Statistika. https://www.bps.go.id/publication/2022/07/12/c52d5cebe530c363d0ea4198/luas-panen-dan-produksi-padi-di-indonesia-2021.html. Diakses pada 20 Oktober 2022

Chan, K. X., Crisp, P. A., Estavillo, G. M., & Pogson, B. J. (2010). Chloroplast-to-nucleus communication: Current knowledge, experimental strategies and relationship to drought stress signaling. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 5(12).

Chen, D., Wang, S., Cao, B., Cao, D., Leng, G., Li, H., Yin, L., Shan, L., & Deng, X. (2016). Genotypic variation in growth and physiological response to drought stress and re-watering reveals the critical role of recovery in drought adaptation in maize seedlings. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6(JAN2016), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.01241

GRiSP, (Global Rice Science Partnership). (2013). Rice Almanac, 4th edition: Source Book for One of the Most Important Economic Activities on Earth (4th ed.). IRRI. https://doi.org/https://archive.org/details/RiceAlmanac/page/n127/mode/2up?view=theater&q=indonesia. Diakses pada 19 Oktober 2022

Hariyono, H. (2015). Keragaan Vegetatif Dan Generatif Beberapa Varietas Tanaman Padi ( Oryza Sativa L. ) Terhadap Cekaman Kekeringan Pada Fase Pertumbuhan Yang Berbeda. Planta Tropika: Journal of Agro Science, 2(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.18196/pt.2014.019.20-27

Khan, M. S., Sakaram, S., & Hemalatha, S. (2019). Detection of biochemical and molecular changes in Oryza sativa L during drought stress. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology, 19.

Kim, Y., Chung, Y. S., Lee, E., Tripathi, P., Heo, S., & Kim, K. H. (2020). Root response to drought stress in rice (Oryza sativa L.). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(4), 12–14.

Maisura, M. A., Lubis, I., Junaedinand, A., & Ehara, H. (2014). Some physiological character responses of rice under drought conditions in a paddy system. J Int Soc Southeast Asian Agric Sci, 20(1), 104–114.

Mardita, S., & Violita, V. (2019). Morphological Indices of Drought Tolerant of Some Paddy Varieties (Oryza sativa L.) In West Sumatera Using Standard Evaluation System (SES) For Rice. Bioscience, 3(1), 60.

Miftahudin, Putri, R. E., & Chikmawati, T. (2020). Vegetative morphophysiological responses of four rice cultivars to drought stress. Biodiversitas, 21(8), 3727–3734.

Mullan, D., & Pietragalla, J. (2012). Leaf relative water content. Canopy Temperature, Stomatal Conductance and Water Relation Traits, 25–27.

Teulat, B., Zoumarou-Wallis, N., Rotter, B., Ben Salem, M., Bahri, H., & This, D. (2003). QTL for relative water content in field-grown barley and their stability across Mediterranean environments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 108(1), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1417-7

Umadevi, M., Pushpa, R., Sampathkumar, K. P., & Bhowmik, D. (2012). Rice-Traditional Medicinal Plant in India. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 1(1).

Verma, G., Srivastava, D., Tiwari, P., & Chakrabarty, D. (2019). ROS Modulation in Crop Plants Under Drought Stress. In Reactive Oxygen, Nitrogen and Sulfur Species in Plants (pp. 311–336). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Violita, V., & Azhari, S. (2021). Effect of PEG-8000 imposed drought stress on rice varieties germination. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1940(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1940/1/012071

Wang, X., Yao, X., Zhao, A., Yang, M., Zhao, W., LeTourneau, M. K., Dong, J., & Gao, X. (2021). Phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C gene involved in heat and drought tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Genes and Genomics, 43(10), 1167–1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-021-01123-x

Wasson, A. P., Richards, R. A., Chatrath, R., Misra, S. C., Prasad, S. V. S., Rebetzke, G. J., Kirkegaard, J. A., Christopher, J., & Watt, M. (2012). Traits and selection strategies to improve root systems and water uptake in water-limited wheat crops. Journal of Experimental Botany, 63(9), 3485–3498. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers111

Xu, Z., Zhou, G., & Shimizu, H. (2010). Plant responses to drought and rewatering. Plant Signaling and Behavior, 5(6), 649–654. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.5.6.11398

Yoshida, S., Forno, D. A., Cock, J. H., & Gomez, K. A. (1976). Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 61.

Zagoto, A. D. P., & Violita, V. (2019). Leaf Anatomical Modification in Drought of Rice Varieties (Oryza sativa L.). Eksakta : Berkala Ilmiah Bidang MIPA, 20(2), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.24036/eksakta/vol20-iss2/201.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/bsc.v8i1.122676

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Rezi Nabilah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Bioscience is Indexed By: