A TEACHING PRACTICE INCORPORATING STUDENTS’ GOAL AND INSTITUTIONAL GOAL IN BIG-SIZED ENGLISH CLASSES

Ari Nurweni

Abstract


This paper reports a teaching and learning practice in three big-sized English classes incorporating the learning goal set by the students and that by their institution, and three questions in relation to the teaching and learning practice were investigated: 1) What do the students perceive at a text-based teaching and learning?; 2) What problems do the students face at a text-based teaching and learning class?; and 3) What do the students learn at the text-based teaching and learning ?The subjects of this study were 208 first year students of a state engineering institute in Lampung, Sumatera, Indonesia, who were put in 3 different classes. The teaching and learning activities were based on academic texts selected by the students in a group of ten. In every meeting a group of the students who had prepared a two-page English academic text presented its title and key words to the class, whereas the other groups asked questions based on the title and key words which had to be answered by the group orally. In every meeting at the end of the class the students were asked to write a journal according to the research questions. The results showed that they perceived the teaching practice differently, they had some problems,but  they learnt some linguistic elements as well as skills, and  they realized that they still needed to improve their English skill and to improve their participation in speaking.


Keywords


Big-sized English class, text-based English teaching and learning, perception

Full Text:

PDF

References


Day. R. 2015. Equalizing Classroom Participation. The Journal of Asia TEFL. 12, 2: 1-17.

Derewianka, B. 1991. Exploring How Texts Work. Australia: Primary English Teaching Association.

Johns, T. and Davies. F. 1983. Text as a vehicle for Information: the classroom use of written texts in teaching reading in a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign Language. 1, 1: 1-19.

Krashen, S. 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. New York: Longman.

Leeming, P., 2014. Group Formation and Longevity in the Foreign Language Classroom: Students’ Views. The Journal of Asia TEFL. 11, 3: 105-132.

Lixin, Xiao. 2005. Do we reliably know what EFL students like in the English classroom at university level?

Long, M.H. and Porter, P.A. 1985. Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 2: 207-228.

Marina, V. and Marmiene, A. 2006. Text-based language teaching and the analysis of tasks presented in English course books for students of information technology and computing. Santalka. Filologija.

Edukologija., T. 14, Nr. 2. ISSN 1822–430X print 1822–4318 online.

Mickan, P. 2012. Text-Based Teaching: Theory and Practice. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/265011929.

Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Second Edition. California: Sage Publications, Inc.

Nation, I.S.P. and Newton.J. 2009. Teaching ESL/EFL Listening and Speaking. New York: Routledge.

Swain, M. 2000. The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialoque. In J.P. Lantolf (Ed.). (pp. 97-144). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:

Google Scholar.