LECTURERS’ CLASSROOM DISCOURSE EVENTS AND POWER RELATION USED IN COMMUNICATING LEARNING TASKS

Yelfiza Yelfiza

Abstract


This study is proposed to find out lecturers’ discourse event in communicating learning tasks. There are two research questions formulated in this research. They are types of events of the discourse and the power relation of each event. The method of the research is content analysis. The research participants were chosen purposively, based on consideration of the subjects they taught; Research in Language Teaching, Classroom Management, Speech, Translation, and Paper/r Thesis Writing. The other participants were the students who studied with the lecturers. Data were gathered by recording the process of learning. They were analyzed by using textual analysis. Findings of the research show that the lecturers’ classroom discourse has 9 types of events, namely 1) preparing before discussion, 2) confirming, 3) giving comment on the students’ work and respond to the student’s question, 4) commanding, 5) directing, 6) encouraging, 7) giving information about tasks, 8) rereading materials and commanding, and 9) discussing. Meanwhile, the power relation is categorized into two forms, namely lecturer’s domination and equal function between the lecturer and the students. The lecturer and the students have equal power in encouraging and discussing events, but they do not have it in the other events. Based on the findings, lecturers are recommended to use the discourse in which the lecturer and the students have equal power in producing the discourse.


Keywords


discourse event, learning task, communicating, and power relation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bloome, David, Carter, Stephanie Power, Christian, Beth Morton, Otto, Sheila, Shuart-Faris, Nora. Discourse Analysis & The Study of Classroom Language & Literacy Events-A Microethnoggraphic Perspective. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005.

Fairclough, Norman. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Blackwell, 2006.

Krapp, Kristine (ed). Psychologists and their Theories for Students. New York: Thomson Gale, 2005.

Mayring, Phillip. Quantitative Content Analysis. Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Klagenfurt, URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-soar-395173, 2014.

Morand, David. A. “Language and Power: an Empirical Analysis of Linguistic Strategies Used in Superior-Subordinates Communication.” Journal of Organizational Behavio, 2000.

Roggers, Robecca. A Critical Discourse Analysis of Family Literacy Practices. New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, 2003.

Van-Dijk, Teun A. Discourse Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.

Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer. Methods of Critical Analysis. London: Sage Publication, 2001.

Jacobs, Gloria E. “Models of Power in the Deletion of Participation in a Classroom Literacy Event.” Journal of Research in Reading. Blackwell, 2010.

Barton, David and Mary Hamilton. Local Literacies Reading and Writing in one Community. London: Rotledge, 2012.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:

Google Scholar.

The Proceedings of International Seminar on English Language and Teaching is registered at LIPI