POLITENESS ISSUES IN COMMUNICATION OVER TEXT MESSAGES

Made Frida Yulia

Abstract


Text messages have become common media of communication in this era. Face-to-face interactions between teachers and students have often been replaced by virtual communication through these media. In practice, such a communication may create breakdown due to the language which is used in them. Politeness features which serve an essential buffer for a successful interaction are sometimes neglected. The research was aimed at analyzing politeness issues appearing in English and Indonesian text messages. The communication took place between Indonesian students at the English Education Department of Sanata Dharma University Yogyakarta and their teachers. Thirty text messages were collected from various teachers and then they were analyzed. The analysis revealed that there were features in the text messages which did not abide by the principles of politeness. It could be seen among others from the diction and absence of greetings and address terms. The situation was potentially able to induce discomfort on the receiver’s part and it may affect the flow and success of communication. From the findings it could be concluded that not all of the senders had sociolinguistic competence. Such senders often disregarded the concepts of social distance and power relation, which should actually be taken into consideration while texting their teachers.


Keywords


text messages, communication, politeness, sociolinguistic competence

Full Text:

PDF

References


Broersma, D. H. 2016. How do I Learn Sociolinguistic Competence? Retrieved on 23 January 2016 from http://www.wheaton.edu/bgc/ICCT/slares/FAQ9.html

Brown, P. and S. C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chaika, E. 1989. Language, the Social Mirror. Cambridge: Newbury House.

Gloria, S. 2016. The Use of Brown and Levinson’s Politeness Strategies as Seen in Elizabeth Gilbert’s Eat Pray Love. Unpublished Thesis. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.

Holmes, J. 2001. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. 2nd ed. London: Longman.

NCLRC Home. 2007. Teaching Goals and Methods. Retrieved on 23 January 2016 from http://www.nclrc.org/essentials/goalsmethods/goal.htm

Oregon University 1997. Politeness. Retrieved on 23 August 2009 from http://logos.uoregon.edu/explore/socioling/ politeness.html.

SIL International. 1999. What is sociolinguistic competence? LinguaLinks Library, Version 3.5 Retrieved on 23 January 2016 from http://www.sil.org/lingualinks/LANGUAGELEARNING/OtherResources/GudlnsFrALnggAndCltrLrnngPrgrm/WhatIsSociolinguisticCompetenc.htm

Wardhaugh, R. 2002. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Limited.

Yule, G. 1998. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Yulia, M. F. 2009. A Sociolinguistic Analysis on Politeness Features in English Text Messages. CONEST 6 Proceedings. Jakarta: Atma Jaya Catholic University.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:

Google Scholar.

The Proceedings of International Seminar on English Language and Teaching is registered at LIPI