ADDRESSING COGNITIVE ISSUES IN LEARNING ENGLISH GRAMMAR: LEARNED SELECTIVE ATTENTION AND CONCEPTUAL TRANSFER

David Wijaya

Abstract


Learning grammar is cognitively demanding and thereby presents a number of difficulties to learners. These difficulties include learned attention and first language conceptual transfer phenomena on the part of the learner. The attention that is learned during first language acquisition and prior to learning English as a second language overshadows and blocks the acquisition of focal aspects of the target grammar, such as the simple past -ed and the suffix -s. These issues are compounded by conceptual categories that are structured and formed also during first language acquisition. Second language researchers have proposed form-focused instruction as a way to deal with these issues. However, research shows that the common traditional approach that is used in this type of instruction does not always specifically address the problems mentioned earlier. As a result, EFL learners remain ill-served. This paper discusses the two cognitive issues that arise from first language learning experience, considers the implications for language teaching and examines various pedagogical options that can address the cognitive issues in question. The reactions are expectedly able to direct learners’ attention to the important aspects and minimize the negative transfer. The overarching goal is to help learners in their acquisition of English grammar. In concluding, I recommend incorporating this approach in EFL instruction.    


Keywords


negative transfer, cognitive issues, grammar, English language teaching, Indonesian EFL learners

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alloway, T., & Corley, M. (2004). Speak before you think: The role of language inverb concepts. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, 319–345.

Azar, B. S. (2003). Fundamentals of English grammar. London: Regents/PrenticeHall.

Bardovi-Harlig,K. 2000. Tense and Aspect in Second Language Acquisition: Form,meaning, and use. Oxford: Blackwell.

Benati, A. 2005. ‘The effects of processing instruction, traditional instruction andmeaning-output instruction on the acquisition of the English simple pasttense.’ Language Teaching Research 9/1: 67–93.

Butler, Y. G. (2002). Second language learners’ theories on the use of English articles: An analysis of the metalinguistic knowledge used by Japanese students in acquiring the English article system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 451–480.

Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFLteacher’s course (second edition). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Diane Larsen-Freeman (2015). Research into practice: Grammar learning andteaching. Language Teaching, 48, pp 263-280doi:10.1017/S0261444814000408

DeKeyser, R. M. (2005). What makes learning second‐language grammar difficult? Areview of issues. Language Learning, 55(S1), 1-25.

DeKeyser, R. & G. Prieto Botana (2014). The effectiveness of processing instructioninL2 grammar acquisition: A narrative review. Applied Linguistics,AdvancedAccess, published 8 December 2014.

Ellis, N. C. 2002a. ‘Frequency effects in language processing: A review withimplications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition,’ Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24/2: 143–88.

Ellis, N. C. 2002b. ‘Reflections on frequency effects in language processing,’ Studiesin Second Language Acquisition 24/2: 297–339.

Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective Attention and Transfer Phenomena in L2 Acquisition: Contingency, Cue Competition, Salience, Interference, Overshadowing, Blocking,andPerceptual Learning. Applied Linguistics, 27 (2), 164-194.

Goldschneider, J. M. and R. DeKeyser. 2001. ‘Explaining the ‘‘natural order of L2morpheme acquisition’’ in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants,’ Language Learning 51: 1–50.

Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic influence in language andcognition. New York: Routledge.

Jean, G. & D. Simard (2011). Grammar learning in English and French L2: Students’and teachers’ beliefs and perceptions. Foreign Language Annals 44.4, 465–492.

Knepler, M. (1990). Grammar with a purpose: A contextualized approach. Boston,MA: Heinle & Heinle.

Kruschke, J. K. and N. J. Blair. 2000. ‘Blocking and backward blocking involve learned inattention,’ Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 7: 636–45.

Lado, R. 1957. Linguistics across Cultures: Applied Linguistics for LanguageTeachers. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Lennon, P. (1991). Error and the very advanced learner. IRAL, 29, 33-44.

MacWhinney, B. 1997. ‘Second language acquisition and the Competition Model’ inA. M. B. De Groot and J. F. Kroll (eds): Tutorials in Bilingualism:Psycholinguistic Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 113–142.

MacWhinney, B. 2001. ‘The competition model: The input, the context, and thebrain’ in P. Robinson (ed.): Cognition and Second Language Instruction. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 69–90.

Matessa, M. and J. R. Anderson. 2000. ‘Modeling focused learning in roleassignment,’ Language and Cognitive Processes 15/3: 263–92.

McCarthy, M. and Carter, R. (1997). Written and spoken vocabulary. In N. SchmidtandM. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy(pp. 20-39).Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Nassaji, H., & Tian, J. (2010). Collaborative and individual output tasks and theireffects on learning English phrasal verbs. Language Teaching Research, 14, 397–419.

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2001). Does type of instruction make a difference? Substantive findings from a meta-analytic review. Language Learning, 51, 157–213.

Odlin, T. 1989. Language Transfer. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Pica, T. 1983. ‘Adult acquisition of English as a second language under different conditionsof exposure.’ Language Learning 33: 465–97.

Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communicative tasksforsecond language instruction. In S. Gass, & G. Crookes (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9–34). Clevedon:MultilingualMatters.

Qin, J. 2008. ‘The effect of processing instruction and dictogloss tasks on acquisitionofthe English passive voice.’ Language Teaching Research 12/1: 61–82.

Schmidt, R. 2001. ‘Attention’ in P. Robinson (ed.): Cognition and Second LanguageInstruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–32.

Sharwood Smith, M. 1981. ‘Consciousness raising and the second-language learner,’Applied Linguistics 2: 159–68.

Tyler, A. and Evans, V. (2003). The semantics of English prepositions: Spatialscenes,embodied meaning and cognition. Cambridge, UK: CambridgeUniversity Press.

VanPatten, B. & T. Cadierno (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing.Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, 225–243.

Wajnryb, R. (1990). Grammar dictation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:

Google Scholar.

The Proceedings of International Seminar on English Language and Teaching is registered at LIPI