PROMOTING HUMANISTIC TEACHING THROUGH SPEECH ACTS AWARENESS

Andri Donal

Abstract


Education is verv important because it is a moral enterprise that shapes human development. A good education system should be able to develop students' potential by appreciating the diversity owned by students without pressure. force and violence especially from the individual of a teacher. In the cbntext of classroom developing autonomy and humanity is not a natural process, but an interactive process between teacher and students under social power relationships. Teacher's speech acts in the classroom potentially break the humanistic education principles. Discussing the relationship betrveen teacher's speech acts and the humanistic teaching is interesting to be explored. A teacher. someone who has authority in the classroom should be able to implement the humanistic teaching. Humanistic teaching is a teaching process that considers the principles of humanism involving the consideration of each individual's potential and self actualization. Because in teaching learning process: the interaction between teacher and students occurs naturally. It needs teacher's awareness in uttering speech acts. Teachers must be aware that their speech acts will have great impact to students. It can shape students' attitude not only towards teacher but also to lesson taught by that teacher. Therefore, promoting the implementation of humanistic teaching through teachers' speech acts awareness is a must.


Keywords


Question and answer relationship. reading comprehension, strategy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bach, Kent. 1994. Meaning and Communication Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://usenvrvw.sfsu.edu/kbach/Bach.Meaning&Communication.pdf. Retrieved on July30,2014

Cicciarelli. MarySue. 2011. Humanistic Theories that Guide Online Course Desigtt. Duquesne University

Donal, Andri.2015. "Students'Attitude towards Teacher's Speech Acts."LIA Internatioanl Conference Journal. Volume 8 No. I ISSN 2087-9504, Jakarta. LBPP LIA

Gage, N & Berliner, D. 1991. Educational psychologt (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton, Miftlin

Grogan, Jessica. 2008. A Cultural History of The Humanistic Psychology Movement in America. The Journal of America History. Volume 96 No. 2

Jhonson, Andrerv. 2014. Education Psychology, Theories of Learning and Human Development. National Science Press.

Katib. Muhammad.2013. Humanistic Education: Concems, Implications and Applications. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 15-51, January 20l3ISSN 1798-1769.

Lei. Q.2007. EFL teachers" factors and students" affect. US-China Education Reviev,, 1(3),60-67. doi:10.2307ll 170741.

Leech, Geoffrev. 1983 Princlples ofPragmalics. New York: Longman Sineapore Publishine.

McKenna, G. 1995. Learning theories made easy: Humanism. Nursing Standard, 2 (9).29-31.

Rideout. G. & Koot, R. 2009. Reflective- humanistic, eff-ective teacher education: Do principles supported in the Deans' Accord make a diflerence in program outcomes? Canadian Journal of Education. 32(4) 927 956- Retrieved May 10-2015

Stevick, E. W. 1990. Humanism in language teaching: A critical perspective. Oxfbrd: Oxford University Press.

UU Sisdiknas Tahun 2003.

Versehueren. J. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold

Yule. George. 1996. Pragmatics. New York. Oxford University Press.

Yule. George. 2006. The Study of Language 3rd Edition. New, York, Cambridge Universitv Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Proceedings of ISELT FBS Universitas Negeri Padang



This Proceedings is Currently indexed by:

Google Scholar.

The Proceedings of International Seminar on English Language and Teaching is registered at LIPI