MODERN RACISM: BINARY OPPOSITION OF BLACK AND WHITE IN THE NOVELS OF JACQUELINE WOODSON

Muhammad Al-Hafizh(1), Faruk Faruk(2), Juliasih Juliasih(3),
(1) Doctoral Student of Universitas Gadjah Mada, Bulak Sumur Yogyakarta, Indonesia  Indonesia
(2) Professor in Literary Studies at Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia  Indonesia
(3) Professor in American Studies at Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2016 Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/ld.v10i1.6330

Full Text:    Language : en    Language : en

Abstract


The meaning of thing in a discourse is potentially determined by soemoene who has the power. In this case, a discourse is purposely designed and conditioned by dominan institution. Through the language in a discourse, some bad characters or images can be attributed to someone such as subversive, fundamentalist, terrorist, and so on. Such phenomena also can be found in the terminology of black and white in the discourse about racism. Black is identical as the opposition of white. Whereas black is bad, white always has connotation with good things, such as purity, God, excellence, etc. Binary opposition of white and black is continously produced in the discourse about racism. Black people (negroid) are assumed inferior toward white (caucasoid). At the same time, language also contribute positive image toward people who have the authority. In that case, language is not only a grammatical system, but it leads to the conflict of interest. This paper is a result of library research toward a discourse about racism in the novels of Jacqueline Woodson. The research was conducted by using poscolonialism and deconstruction approach. This reserach is aimed at revealing: (1) how are the image about black and white are constructed in the novels of Jacqueline Woodson. (2) What are the binary opposition, decentering and fixasion aspects in that novels. The conclusion of this research shows that language is still powerfull in shaping ideas about racism, especially in keeping the issues of black and white as binary opposition. 

 

Key words: discourse, binary opposition, power, racism


Keywords


discourse, binary opposition, power, racism

References


Almaguer, Thomás. 1994. Racial Fault Lines: The Historical Origins of White Supremacy in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Back, Les dan John Solomos. 2001. Theories of Race and Racism. London : Rouledge

Banton, Michael. 1974. A Turning Point in the Study of Race Relations. Cambridge: American Academy of Arts and Science.

Benedict, Ruth. 1961. Race: Science and Politics. New York: Viking Press.

Dirlik, Arif. 2008. “Race Talk, Race, and Contemporary Racism”. PMLA, Vol. 123, No. 5, (Oct., 2008), pp. 1363-1379.

Frankel, Beth. 2009. “Immigrants and Modern Racism: Reproducing Inequality by Merenstein”. Contemporary Sociology, Vol. 38, No. 5 (Sep., 2009), pp. 462-463.

Fredrickson, George M. 2002. Racism: A Short History . New Jersey UK: Princenton University Press.

Foucoult, M. 1980. Bahasa Dan Kekuasaan. Terj. LKis Yogyakarta.

Huddart, David. 2006. Race Time and the Revision of Modernity. London: Routledge.

Hutcheon, Linda. 2004. Politik Modernisme. Yogyakarta: Jendela.

Jayasuriya, Laksiri. 1998. “Old Racism and New Racism”. AQ: Australian Quarterly, Vol. 70, No. 5 (Sep. - Oct., 1998), pp. 4-5.

Jordan, Withrop D. 1968. White Over Black: The Attitude toward the Negro. New York: The University of North Carolina Press.

Jorgensen, Marianne W dan Louise J Philips. 2007. Analisis Wacana: Teori dan Metode (Terj). Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

Kartodirdjo, Sartono. 1990. Kebudayaan Pembangunan dalam Perspektif Sejarah. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Ladson, Gloria. 1996. “Your Blues Ain't like Mine: Keeping Issues of Race and Racism on the Multicultural Agenda”. Theory into Practice, Vol. 35, No. 4, (Autumn, 1996), pp. 248-255.

Lieberman, Leonard and Larry T. Reynolds. 1991. “Race and Racism in the Academy and on the Streets”. Michigan Sociological Review, No. 5 (Fall, 1991), pp. 19-30.

Latif, dkk. 1996. Bahasa dan Kekuasaan: Politik Di Panggung Orde Baru. Bandung : Mizan

Modood, Tariq and Richard Berthoud. 2002. “Race, Racism and Ethnicity”. Sociology, Vol. 36, No. 2 (MAY 2002), pp. 419-427.

Oommen,T.K. 1997. Citizenship, Nationality and Ethnicity: Reconciling Competing Identities. Cambridge: Polity Press & Blackwell Publisher Ltd.

Ramón A. Gutiérrez. 2004. “Internal Colonialism: An American Theory of Race”. Du Bois Review, 1, pp 281-295.

Sniderman, M. Paul. 1991. “New Racism” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 35, No. 2 9May, 1991). Pp. 423-447.

Spoonley, Paul. 1988. Racism and Ethnicity. New Zealand : OUP Press

Sugiyono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Cetakan Ke-20. Bandung : Alfabeta.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 1465 times
 PDF Downloaded : 462 times  PDF Downloaded : 462 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2016 Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa