WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK GIVEN BY TEACHERS OF MTSN DURIAN TARUNG PADANG ON STUDENTS’ GRAMMATICAL ERRORS

Rahmi Roza P(1), Saunir Saun(2), Fitrawati Fitrawati(3),
(1) English Department Faculty of Languages and Arts State University of Padang  Indonesia
(2) English Department Faculty of Languages and Arts State University of Padang  Indonesia
(3) English Department Faculty of Languages and Arts State University of Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of English Language Teaching

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v5i1.7274

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


This research aimed at finding out the types of written corrective feedback used by English  teachers of a junior high school on student’s grammatical errors , and problems related to written corrective feedback on grammatical errors from the teacher’s perspectives. This is a descriptive research in which the population was all of English teacher of MTsN Durian Tarung Padang. By using maximal variation sampling technique, all of the teachers, who were five teachers, were chosen to be the sample. The first instrument used was documents which were notebooks and exercise books of the students of the school in the year 2015/2016, and the second instrument was interview with the teachers. From the research, it was found that only three types of the five types were practiced by the teachers. They were, consecutively written from the most frequently used to the least, direct corrective feedback, indirect corrective feedback and metalinguistic feedback with the use of error codes. In addition, problems related to written CF were repetition of errors, students proficiency, student’s attitude, time-consuming, ineffectiveness of existing error feedback practice, and readability of students writing. Therefore, English teacher, future teachers should enrich their knowledge of written corrective feedback, optimizing their correction to optimize the benefits to the students language development and find solution to solve problem related to written corrective on students’ grammatical error.


Keywords


Written corrective feedback, grammatical errors

References


Bitchener, John et al. 2005. “The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing.”Retrived from Journal of Second Language Writing. 10. 1016/ j. jslw. 2005. 08. 001.

Brown, Douglas . 2000. Teaching by Principles Second Edition . New York :Pearson Longman.

------------------ . 2007. Teaching by Principles Fifth Edition . New York :Pearson Longman.

Brown, Douglas &PriyanvadaAbeywickarama. 2010. Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. New York : Pearson Longman.

Chandler,J.2003.The Efficacy of Variious Kind of Error Fedback for Improvement in the Accuracy and Fluency of L2 Students’ Writing.Retrived on May 2nd 2015 from Journal of Second Language Writing 12: 267-96.

Ellis, Rod. 2009a. “A Typology of Written Corrective Feedback Types”.Retrieved on September 3rd 2014 from Oxford ELT Journal, doi:10.1093/elt/ccn023 97.

Ferris, D. 2006. Does Error Feedback Help Students Writers?: New evidence on short –long- term effects of written correction. In K.

Hyland and F. Hyland (Eds.).Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Folse, Keith S. 2009. Keys to Teaching Grammars to English

Language Language Learners.Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.

Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching 4th edition. Shanshai: Pearson Longman.

Lee, Icy. 2003. “L2 Writing Teachers’ Prespectives, Practices and Problems Regarding Error Feedback”. Retrieved on July 5th from ElseiverInc: 10.1016/ j. asw. 2003. 08. 002.

-----------------. 2004. “Error Correction in L2 Clasroom: the case of Hong Kong.”.Retrieved on March 20th 2015 from Journal of Second Language Writing, 13, 285-312.

Oktrifiani, R & An Fauzia, R, S. 2013. Using Writing Models as a Technique in Teaching Writing to Elementary School Students. Journal of English Language Teaching, 2 (1): 448-452.

Pawlak, Miroslaw. 2014. Error Correction in the Foreign Language Classroom. Berlin: Springer.

Rassaei, Ehsan. and Ahmad Moinzadeh. 2011. “Investigating the Effect of Three Types of Corrective Feedback of on the Acquisition of English WH-Questions Forms by Iranian EFL Learners”.Retrieved on May 2nd, 2015 from English Language Teaching Journal DOI: 10.5539/elt.V4N2P97.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 889 times
 PDF Downloaded : 63 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Journal of English Language Teaching

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.