The Analysis of the Level of the Students’ Reading Comprehension by Using Barrett Taxonomy in SMAN 1 Lubuk Alung

Annisa Krismadayanti(1), Yetti Zainil(2),
(1) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia
(2) Universitas Negeri Padang  Indonesia

Corresponding Author
Copyright (c) 2021 Annisa Krismadayanti

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v10i4.114966

Full Text:    Language : en

Abstract


The Industrial Revolution 4.0 created new changes in education system in Indonesia. Education is demanded to fulfill standardization. The students are also demanded to have good ability in reading comprehension. This study is aimed to find out the level of the students’ reading comprehension in narrative text by using Barrett’s taxonomy in SMAN 1 Lubuk Alung. The population was the eleventh grade students in academic year 2021/2022 who have learned narrative text in tenth grade with the total 359 students. Based on the population, the sample of this research is two classes consisted of 80 students selected using cluster random sampling. This research is descriptive quantitative research and used test and questionnaire as the instruments. This research found that the mean of the students’ score was 64.525 and it was categorized in good category. Besides that, the students have good ability in answering the questions in form of appreciation level. This study also found that students tent to have difficulty in answering questions in form of evaluation level.


Keywords


The Level of Reading Comprehension, Narrative text, Barrett Taxonomy

References


Amalya, R. V. A., Anugerahwati, M., & Yaniafari, R. P. (2020). An Analysis of Reading Comprehension Questions Based on Barrett’s Taxonomy of An English Coursebook Entitled Bright for Eight Graders. National English Education, Language, and Literature Seminar.

ARSAF, A. S. (2020). TEACHING ENGLISH IN INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 4.0: Challenges and Opportunities.

Asmin, A. I. (2020). Observing the Intellectual Curiosity of English Education Students in the Class. Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, Volume 8(English study program of IAIN Palopo), 46 – 58.

Brown, H. D. (2003). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practice. Pearson Education.

Cresswell, J. W., & Cresswell, J. D. (2002). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitaive. SAGE.

Day, R. R., & Park, J. (2005). Developing reading comprehension questions. 17(1). Duffy, G. (2009). Explaining Reading: A Resource for Teaching Skills and Strategies.Pearson Education.

Fitri, F. (2020). An Analysis of Students’ Reading Comprehension of Analytical Text in SMA Negeri 2 Batusangkar. Universitas Negeri Padang.

Fitri, F., & Rozimela, Y. (2020). An Analysis of Students’ Reading Comprehension of Analytical Exposition Text in SMA Negeri 2 Batusangkar. Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(2), 405. https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v9i2.108613

Gay, L. R., Mills, G., & Airisian, P. W. (2012). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Application. Pearson Education.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Educational Challenges to the 4.0 Industrial Revolution: Experience from Indonesia. The International Academin Seminar 2018.

Heilman, A. W., Rupley, T., & Blair, W. (1981). Principles and Practices of Teaching Reading (10th Editi). Charles E Merril Publishing Co.

Herman, D. (2005). Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. Routledge Ltd. Hidayati, D. (2018). Students Difficulties in Reading Comprehension At. Students Difficulties in Reading Comprehension At.

Humos, O. A. (2012). An Evaluative Analysis of Comprehension Questions’ Level of Difficulty: A case of 12th Grade Palestinian English Student’s Textbook. An - Najah Univ. J. Res. (Humanities)., 26(3).

Junika, H. (2018). An Analyis of Students’ Reading Comprehension in Recount Text of Barrett’s Taxonomy of the Eight of SMP Negeri 4 Sia Hulu. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-76887-8%0Ahttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-93594- 2%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409517-5.00007-

%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2015.06.018%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s 41559-019-0877-3%0Aht

Khoirunnisa, A., & Widodo, E. (2019). Students’ Difficulties in Comprehending Narrative Text. 7(2), 65–74.

Lase, D. (2019). EDUCATION AND INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION 4.0. ResearchGate.

Mahendra, & Rosa, R. N. (2014). Teaching Writing A Narrative Text by Using the Spin-A-Story Writing Prompt to Junior High School Students. Journal of English Language Teaching (JELT), 3(1), 78–86.

Marzona, Y., & Ikhsan, M. (2019). an Analysis of Students’ Reading Comprehension in Narrative Text At Second Grade At Sman 1 Talamau. 3(1), 35–41. http://e- journal.sastra-unes.com/index.php/JIPS

Mikulecky, B. S. (2007). Advanced Reading Power. The Guildford Press. Mutuota, K. (2002). Relating the Structure of the Oral Narrative To Literacy.

Noviandi. (2014). An Analysis of Students’ Ability in Comprehending Narrative Text at Grade XI SMA Nurul Ilmi Padangsidimpuan. IAIN Padangsidimpuan.

Read, D. J. (1975). How Good are Your Questions? Michigan Reading Journal, Volume 9(Issue 2).

Sarwo. (2013). Analysis on the Students ’ Problems in Comprehending Narrative Texts. A Research Journal.

Surtantini, R. (2019). Reading Comprehension Question Levels in Grade X English Students’ Book in Light of the Issues of Curriculum Policy in Indonesia. 44–52.

Walipah, E., Rahman, Sopandi, W., & Sujana, A. (2020). School Literacy Movement in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0 in Building Speed Reading Skills. The 2nd International Conference on Elementary Education, Volume 2.


Article Metrics

 Abstract Views : 563 times
 PDF Downloaded : 188 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Annisa Krismadayanti

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.